土压力分布的模型试验与有限元分析

IF 6.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jungang Liu , Feng Liang , Geng Chen
{"title":"土压力分布的模型试验与有限元分析","authors":"Jungang Liu ,&nbsp;Feng Liang ,&nbsp;Geng Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.aej.2025.04.083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a comprehensive comparison of laboratory experiments and numerical simulations using finite element analysis (FEA) to investigate the effects of various geotextile spacing on the distribution of earth pressure. The experiments were conducted in the \"Tiger Cage (TC)\" testing facility at the University of Colorado Denver's (UCD) Geotechnical Engineering Science Center. A total of four large-scale tests were performed on Leyden Clay (LC) and Colorado Department of Transportation Class 1 Structure Backfill Material (CDOT Class 1 SBM) to validate the finite element model. The research focuses on the distribution of earth pressure on Leyden Clay and CDOT Class 1 SBM, validated through large-scale physical tests and 3D FEA simulations performed using the LS-DYNA and ABAQUS software. The results demonstrate the accuracy of numerical models in predicting earth pressure distributions, with strong correlations observed between experimental data and simulation results. The study reveals that the current method provision is inaccurate in predicting earth pressure distribution at the bottom of the wall, as the predicted data from numerical models show the highest earth pressures of 485Kpa around two-thirds of the wall height (150 cm). This research provides valuable insights into soil-structure interaction, contributing to the design and analysis of retaining walls and foundations in geotechnical engineering.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7484,"journal":{"name":"alexandria engineering journal","volume":"127 ","pages":"Pages 18-33"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analysis of model testing and finite element approach for distribution of earth pressures\",\"authors\":\"Jungang Liu ,&nbsp;Feng Liang ,&nbsp;Geng Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aej.2025.04.083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study presents a comprehensive comparison of laboratory experiments and numerical simulations using finite element analysis (FEA) to investigate the effects of various geotextile spacing on the distribution of earth pressure. The experiments were conducted in the \\\"Tiger Cage (TC)\\\" testing facility at the University of Colorado Denver's (UCD) Geotechnical Engineering Science Center. A total of four large-scale tests were performed on Leyden Clay (LC) and Colorado Department of Transportation Class 1 Structure Backfill Material (CDOT Class 1 SBM) to validate the finite element model. The research focuses on the distribution of earth pressure on Leyden Clay and CDOT Class 1 SBM, validated through large-scale physical tests and 3D FEA simulations performed using the LS-DYNA and ABAQUS software. The results demonstrate the accuracy of numerical models in predicting earth pressure distributions, with strong correlations observed between experimental data and simulation results. The study reveals that the current method provision is inaccurate in predicting earth pressure distribution at the bottom of the wall, as the predicted data from numerical models show the highest earth pressures of 485Kpa around two-thirds of the wall height (150 cm). This research provides valuable insights into soil-structure interaction, contributing to the design and analysis of retaining walls and foundations in geotechnical engineering.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"alexandria engineering journal\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 18-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"alexandria engineering journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016825005794\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"alexandria engineering journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016825005794","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用有限元分析(FEA)对室内试验和数值模拟进行了综合比较,探讨了不同土工布间距对土压力分布的影响。实验是在科罗拉多大学丹佛分校(UCD)岩土工程科学中心的“老虎笼(TC)”测试设施中进行的。采用Leyden Clay (LC)和Colorado Department of Transportation Class 1 Structure回填材料(CDOT Class 1 SBM)进行了4次大型试验,验证了有限元模型的有效性。研究重点是莱顿粘土和CDOT 1级SBM的土压力分布,并通过大规模物理试验和使用LS-DYNA和ABAQUS软件进行的三维有限元模拟进行验证。结果表明,数值模型在预测土压力分布方面具有较好的准确性,实验数据与模拟结果具有较强的相关性。研究表明,目前的方法规定在预测墙底土压力分布方面是不准确的,因为数值模型的预测数据显示,在墙高的三分之二处(150 cm),土压力最高为485Kpa。本研究为土-结构相互作用提供了有价值的见解,有助于岩土工程中挡土墙和基础的设计和分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An analysis of model testing and finite element approach for distribution of earth pressures
This study presents a comprehensive comparison of laboratory experiments and numerical simulations using finite element analysis (FEA) to investigate the effects of various geotextile spacing on the distribution of earth pressure. The experiments were conducted in the "Tiger Cage (TC)" testing facility at the University of Colorado Denver's (UCD) Geotechnical Engineering Science Center. A total of four large-scale tests were performed on Leyden Clay (LC) and Colorado Department of Transportation Class 1 Structure Backfill Material (CDOT Class 1 SBM) to validate the finite element model. The research focuses on the distribution of earth pressure on Leyden Clay and CDOT Class 1 SBM, validated through large-scale physical tests and 3D FEA simulations performed using the LS-DYNA and ABAQUS software. The results demonstrate the accuracy of numerical models in predicting earth pressure distributions, with strong correlations observed between experimental data and simulation results. The study reveals that the current method provision is inaccurate in predicting earth pressure distribution at the bottom of the wall, as the predicted data from numerical models show the highest earth pressures of 485Kpa around two-thirds of the wall height (150 cm). This research provides valuable insights into soil-structure interaction, contributing to the design and analysis of retaining walls and foundations in geotechnical engineering.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
alexandria engineering journal
alexandria engineering journal Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
1015
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Alexandria Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publishing high quality papers in the field of engineering and applied science. Alexandria Engineering Journal is cited in the Engineering Information Services (EIS) and the Chemical Abstracts (CA). The papers published in Alexandria Engineering Journal are grouped into five sections, according to the following classification: • Mechanical, Production, Marine and Textile Engineering • Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Nuclear Engineering • Civil and Architecture Engineering • Chemical Engineering and Applied Sciences • Environmental Engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信