肯尼亚增加树木覆盖的经济评估:维持森林连续性的成本

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Paul Bostyn, Thierry Brunelle
{"title":"肯尼亚增加树木覆盖的经济评估:维持森林连续性的成本","authors":"Paul Bostyn,&nbsp;Thierry Brunelle","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As strategies to increase forest cover become more widespread as part of countries' environmental commitments, assessing the trade-offs between economic and environmental aspects of forestry activities is an increasingly pressing issue. This article addresses this question by assessing the cost-effectiveness of increasing forest cover under different land use management strategies that differ in their environmental and economic focus. Our analysis is conducted at the national level in Kenya, a country known for its ambitious environmental policies. Our findings show that prioritizing forest contiguity has a higher economic impact than targeting areas with the lowest opportunity costs, and significantly reduces the cost-effective mitigation potential when applied strictly. In addition, our results suggest that land use strategies affect the shape of the land opportunity cost and marginal abatement cost curves, which may exhibit decreasing and non-convex shapes. Overall, this paper argues that careful consideration of land management systems for increasing forest cover is essential to achieve an optimal balance between environmental benefits and economic costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"235 ","pages":"Article 108649"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic assessment of increasing tree cover in Kenya: The cost of maintaining forest contiguity\",\"authors\":\"Paul Bostyn,&nbsp;Thierry Brunelle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As strategies to increase forest cover become more widespread as part of countries' environmental commitments, assessing the trade-offs between economic and environmental aspects of forestry activities is an increasingly pressing issue. This article addresses this question by assessing the cost-effectiveness of increasing forest cover under different land use management strategies that differ in their environmental and economic focus. Our analysis is conducted at the national level in Kenya, a country known for its ambitious environmental policies. Our findings show that prioritizing forest contiguity has a higher economic impact than targeting areas with the lowest opportunity costs, and significantly reduces the cost-effective mitigation potential when applied strictly. In addition, our results suggest that land use strategies affect the shape of the land opportunity cost and marginal abatement cost curves, which may exhibit decreasing and non-convex shapes. Overall, this paper argues that careful consideration of land management systems for increasing forest cover is essential to achieve an optimal balance between environmental benefits and economic costs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"volume\":\"235 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108649\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925001326\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925001326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着增加森林覆盖的战略作为各国环境承诺的一部分越来越普遍,评估林业活动的经济和环境方面之间的权衡是一个日益紧迫的问题。本文通过评估在环境和经济重点不同的不同土地利用管理战略下增加森林覆盖的成本效益来解决这个问题。我们的分析是在肯尼亚进行的,这个国家以其雄心勃勃的环境政策而闻名。我们的研究结果表明,优先考虑森林邻近性比以机会成本最低的地区为目标具有更高的经济影响,并且在严格应用时显着降低了成本效益缓解潜力。此外,土地利用策略影响土地机会成本和边际消减成本曲线的形状,可能呈现递减和非凸形状。总体而言,本文认为,为了实现环境效益和经济成本之间的最佳平衡,必须认真考虑增加森林覆盖的土地管理制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic assessment of increasing tree cover in Kenya: The cost of maintaining forest contiguity
As strategies to increase forest cover become more widespread as part of countries' environmental commitments, assessing the trade-offs between economic and environmental aspects of forestry activities is an increasingly pressing issue. This article addresses this question by assessing the cost-effectiveness of increasing forest cover under different land use management strategies that differ in their environmental and economic focus. Our analysis is conducted at the national level in Kenya, a country known for its ambitious environmental policies. Our findings show that prioritizing forest contiguity has a higher economic impact than targeting areas with the lowest opportunity costs, and significantly reduces the cost-effective mitigation potential when applied strictly. In addition, our results suggest that land use strategies affect the shape of the land opportunity cost and marginal abatement cost curves, which may exhibit decreasing and non-convex shapes. Overall, this paper argues that careful consideration of land management systems for increasing forest cover is essential to achieve an optimal balance between environmental benefits and economic costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信