超越偏见:探索环境评估潜在类别模型分配函数的内生性

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Peio Alcorta , Petr Mariel
{"title":"超越偏见:探索环境评估潜在类别模型分配函数的内生性","authors":"Peio Alcorta ,&nbsp;Petr Mariel","doi":"10.1016/j.reseneeco.2025.101498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite its implications for parameter estimation, endogeneity is often overlooked in applications of discrete choice modeling. In environmental valuation, research on endogeneity typically focuses on the case when it originates in the utilities of the underlying random utility maximization model rather than in the class allocation probabilities of a latent class model (LCM). This paper addresses that gap by assuming the allocation function of an LCM includes an endogenous latent variable and examining four scenarios: (i) omitting this latent variable, (ii) directly including an endogenous indicator, (iii) using a multiple indicator solution that accounts for endogeneity, and (iv) employing a hybrid choice model. Simulation results reveal that while the allocation function parameters suffer bias in the first two scenarios, they are consistently estimated in the latter two. Notably, willingness to pay estimates remain unbiased in all these scenarios. We support these findings through simulation studies and draw connections to the existing statistical literature. Furthermore, we apply these insights to a case study focusing on seaweed-based renewable energy in the UK.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47952,"journal":{"name":"Resource and Energy Economics","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 101498"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond biases: Exploring endogeneity in the allocation function of latent class models for environmental valuation\",\"authors\":\"Peio Alcorta ,&nbsp;Petr Mariel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.reseneeco.2025.101498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite its implications for parameter estimation, endogeneity is often overlooked in applications of discrete choice modeling. In environmental valuation, research on endogeneity typically focuses on the case when it originates in the utilities of the underlying random utility maximization model rather than in the class allocation probabilities of a latent class model (LCM). This paper addresses that gap by assuming the allocation function of an LCM includes an endogenous latent variable and examining four scenarios: (i) omitting this latent variable, (ii) directly including an endogenous indicator, (iii) using a multiple indicator solution that accounts for endogeneity, and (iv) employing a hybrid choice model. Simulation results reveal that while the allocation function parameters suffer bias in the first two scenarios, they are consistently estimated in the latter two. Notably, willingness to pay estimates remain unbiased in all these scenarios. We support these findings through simulation studies and draw connections to the existing statistical literature. Furthermore, we apply these insights to a case study focusing on seaweed-based renewable energy in the UK.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resource and Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101498\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resource and Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765525000223\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resource and Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765525000223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管它对参数估计有影响,但内生性在离散选择建模的应用中经常被忽视。在环境评估中,对内生性的研究通常集中在它源于底层随机效用最大化模型的效用的情况下,而不是源于潜在类别模型(LCM)的类别分配概率。本文通过假设LCM的分配函数包含一个内生潜在变量,并研究了四种情况来解决这一差距:(i)省略这个潜在变量,(ii)直接包含一个内生指标,(iii)使用考虑内生性的多指标解决方案,以及(iv)采用混合选择模型。仿真结果表明,前两种情况下分配函数参数存在偏差,后两种情况下分配函数参数估计一致。值得注意的是,在所有这些情况下,支付估计的意愿仍然是公正的。我们通过模拟研究支持这些发现,并与现有的统计文献建立联系。此外,我们将这些见解应用于一个以英国海藻为基础的可再生能源的案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond biases: Exploring endogeneity in the allocation function of latent class models for environmental valuation
Despite its implications for parameter estimation, endogeneity is often overlooked in applications of discrete choice modeling. In environmental valuation, research on endogeneity typically focuses on the case when it originates in the utilities of the underlying random utility maximization model rather than in the class allocation probabilities of a latent class model (LCM). This paper addresses that gap by assuming the allocation function of an LCM includes an endogenous latent variable and examining four scenarios: (i) omitting this latent variable, (ii) directly including an endogenous indicator, (iii) using a multiple indicator solution that accounts for endogeneity, and (iv) employing a hybrid choice model. Simulation results reveal that while the allocation function parameters suffer bias in the first two scenarios, they are consistently estimated in the latter two. Notably, willingness to pay estimates remain unbiased in all these scenarios. We support these findings through simulation studies and draw connections to the existing statistical literature. Furthermore, we apply these insights to a case study focusing on seaweed-based renewable energy in the UK.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Resource and Energy Economics provides a forum for high level economic analysis of utilization and development of the earth natural resources. The subject matter encompasses questions of optimal production and consumption affecting energy, minerals, land, air and water, and includes analysis of firm and industry behavior, environmental issues and public policies. Implications for both developed and developing countries are of concern. The journal publishes high quality papers for an international audience. Innovative energy, resource and environmental analyses, including theoretical models and empirical studies are appropriate for publication in Resource and Energy Economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信