与以往不一样:回顾人类和啮齿动物的记忆修改、更新和扭曲

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Chad A. Brunswick , Catherine M. Carpenter , Nancy A. Dennis , Janine L. Kwapis
{"title":"与以往不一样:回顾人类和啮齿动物的记忆修改、更新和扭曲","authors":"Chad A. Brunswick ,&nbsp;Catherine M. Carpenter ,&nbsp;Nancy A. Dennis ,&nbsp;Janine L. Kwapis","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Memory is a reconstructive and continuous process that enables existing information to be modified in response to a changing environment. Being able to dynamically update outdated memories is critical to an organism’s survival. Memory modifications have been extensively studied in both rodents and humans, and prior work has revealed many regional, cellular, neurotransmitter, and subcellular molecular mechanisms underlying this process. However, these diverse bodies of literature have not yet been fully integrated into a comprehensive cross-species review. Integrating the finding across rodent and human work is important for furthering our understanding of memory modifications and the underlying neural mechanisms that support memory modification in both species. Here, we discuss advances in our understanding of adaptive and maladaptive memory modifications in terms of both underlying mechanisms (regional, cellular, and molecular) and behavioral outcomes. By emphasizing findings from both humans and rodents, the two major model systems in which memory modifications have been studied, we are able to highlight converging mechanisms and point to open questions in the field. Specifically, we discuss the major findings from several memory paradigms including declarative, aversive and procedural memory designs and highlight paradigms and models that have been readily translated between rodent and human models. Ultimately, this review identifies key parallels underlying memory updating across species, paradigms, tasks, and models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 106195"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not the same as it ever was: A review of memory modification, updating, and distortion in humans and rodents\",\"authors\":\"Chad A. Brunswick ,&nbsp;Catherine M. Carpenter ,&nbsp;Nancy A. Dennis ,&nbsp;Janine L. Kwapis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Memory is a reconstructive and continuous process that enables existing information to be modified in response to a changing environment. Being able to dynamically update outdated memories is critical to an organism’s survival. Memory modifications have been extensively studied in both rodents and humans, and prior work has revealed many regional, cellular, neurotransmitter, and subcellular molecular mechanisms underlying this process. However, these diverse bodies of literature have not yet been fully integrated into a comprehensive cross-species review. Integrating the finding across rodent and human work is important for furthering our understanding of memory modifications and the underlying neural mechanisms that support memory modification in both species. Here, we discuss advances in our understanding of adaptive and maladaptive memory modifications in terms of both underlying mechanisms (regional, cellular, and molecular) and behavioral outcomes. By emphasizing findings from both humans and rodents, the two major model systems in which memory modifications have been studied, we are able to highlight converging mechanisms and point to open questions in the field. Specifically, we discuss the major findings from several memory paradigms including declarative, aversive and procedural memory designs and highlight paradigms and models that have been readily translated between rodent and human models. Ultimately, this review identifies key parallels underlying memory updating across species, paradigms, tasks, and models.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"volume\":\"174 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425001952\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425001952","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

记忆是一个重建和持续的过程,它使现有的信息能够根据不断变化的环境进行修改。能够动态更新过时的记忆对生物体的生存至关重要。记忆修饰在啮齿类动物和人类中都得到了广泛的研究,先前的工作已经揭示了这一过程背后的许多区域、细胞、神经递质和亚细胞分子机制。然而,这些不同的文献尚未被完全整合到一个全面的跨物种综述中。整合啮齿动物和人类研究的发现对于进一步理解记忆修改和支持这两个物种的记忆修改的潜在神经机制非常重要。在这里,我们从潜在机制(区域、细胞和分子)和行为结果两方面讨论了我们对适应性和非适应性记忆修改的理解进展。通过强调人类和啮齿动物的发现,这两种主要的记忆修改模型系统已经被研究过,我们能够强调趋同机制,并指出该领域的开放性问题。具体来说,我们讨论了几种记忆范式的主要发现,包括陈述性、厌恶性和程序性记忆设计,并强调了在啮齿动物和人类模型之间容易转换的范式和模型。最后,本综述确定了跨物种、范式、任务和模型的记忆更新的关键相似之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Not the same as it ever was: A review of memory modification, updating, and distortion in humans and rodents
Memory is a reconstructive and continuous process that enables existing information to be modified in response to a changing environment. Being able to dynamically update outdated memories is critical to an organism’s survival. Memory modifications have been extensively studied in both rodents and humans, and prior work has revealed many regional, cellular, neurotransmitter, and subcellular molecular mechanisms underlying this process. However, these diverse bodies of literature have not yet been fully integrated into a comprehensive cross-species review. Integrating the finding across rodent and human work is important for furthering our understanding of memory modifications and the underlying neural mechanisms that support memory modification in both species. Here, we discuss advances in our understanding of adaptive and maladaptive memory modifications in terms of both underlying mechanisms (regional, cellular, and molecular) and behavioral outcomes. By emphasizing findings from both humans and rodents, the two major model systems in which memory modifications have been studied, we are able to highlight converging mechanisms and point to open questions in the field. Specifically, we discuss the major findings from several memory paradigms including declarative, aversive and procedural memory designs and highlight paradigms and models that have been readily translated between rodent and human models. Ultimately, this review identifies key parallels underlying memory updating across species, paradigms, tasks, and models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信