误导盆地边缘——澳大利亚东北部弧后前陆Bowen盆地上二叠统演替分析

IF 2.8 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Basin Research Pub Date : 2025-05-07 DOI:10.1111/bre.70033
Jasmin Naher, Christopher R. Fielding, Mike A. Martin
{"title":"误导盆地边缘——澳大利亚东北部弧后前陆Bowen盆地上二叠统演替分析","authors":"Jasmin Naher,&nbsp;Christopher R. Fielding,&nbsp;Mike A. Martin","doi":"10.1111/bre.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The meridional, Permo–Triassic Bowen Basin of NE Australia became a retroarc foreland basin in the late Permian, with a mapped foredeep axis (Taroom Trough) running north–south adjacent to the eastern edge of the basin. The present outline of the basin is, nonetheless, shaped by significant structural deformation along its eastern margin, and stratigraphic pinch-outs and erosional truncation in the west. The plan form of the basin thus gives a potentially misleading representation of the basin's original shape and extent. By analysing wireline log data from over 1000 drillholes, we developed isochore, net sand thickness, and net-to-gross maps, which inform a new set of palaeogeographical maps for the three upper Permian formations of the Bowen Basin (Peawaddy Formation, Black Alley Shale, and Bandanna Formation, in ascending order). These maps were further refined using palaeocurrent data from outcrops and validated against logged vertical sections from various parts of the basin. Isochore plots for the three formations indicate abrupt truncation of contour lines along the structural eastern margin, in the Taroom Trough. This pattern is interpreted as evidence of significant erosion of stratigraphy along the eastern basin margin during contractional deformation. Based on these findings, we posit that the Taroom Trough synclinal axis does not represent the original foredeep axis, which we propose was located farther east and was erosionally excised. The configurations of sand-prone depositional systems, and the preservation of upper Permian strata outside the structural basin boundaries, support the hypothesis that the original eastern depositional edge of the basin extended farther east than its current structural boundary. Similarly, truncation and westward onlap of formations along the western margin suggest that the basin's original western boundary lay beyond its present margin. Based on the truncated isochores and other criteria, we estimate that the preserved part of the basin is ~50% of its original area.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8712,"journal":{"name":"Basin Research","volume":"37 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Misleading Basin Margins—Analysis of the Upper Permian Succession in the Retroarc Foreland Bowen Basin of Northeast Australia\",\"authors\":\"Jasmin Naher,&nbsp;Christopher R. Fielding,&nbsp;Mike A. Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bre.70033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The meridional, Permo–Triassic Bowen Basin of NE Australia became a retroarc foreland basin in the late Permian, with a mapped foredeep axis (Taroom Trough) running north–south adjacent to the eastern edge of the basin. The present outline of the basin is, nonetheless, shaped by significant structural deformation along its eastern margin, and stratigraphic pinch-outs and erosional truncation in the west. The plan form of the basin thus gives a potentially misleading representation of the basin's original shape and extent. By analysing wireline log data from over 1000 drillholes, we developed isochore, net sand thickness, and net-to-gross maps, which inform a new set of palaeogeographical maps for the three upper Permian formations of the Bowen Basin (Peawaddy Formation, Black Alley Shale, and Bandanna Formation, in ascending order). These maps were further refined using palaeocurrent data from outcrops and validated against logged vertical sections from various parts of the basin. Isochore plots for the three formations indicate abrupt truncation of contour lines along the structural eastern margin, in the Taroom Trough. This pattern is interpreted as evidence of significant erosion of stratigraphy along the eastern basin margin during contractional deformation. Based on these findings, we posit that the Taroom Trough synclinal axis does not represent the original foredeep axis, which we propose was located farther east and was erosionally excised. The configurations of sand-prone depositional systems, and the preservation of upper Permian strata outside the structural basin boundaries, support the hypothesis that the original eastern depositional edge of the basin extended farther east than its current structural boundary. Similarly, truncation and westward onlap of formations along the western margin suggest that the basin's original western boundary lay beyond its present margin. Based on the truncated isochores and other criteria, we estimate that the preserved part of the basin is ~50% of its original area.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Basin Research\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Basin Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bre.70033\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basin Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bre.70033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经向的二叠纪-三叠纪Bowen盆地在晚二叠世成为弧后前陆盆地,其前深轴(Taroom槽)在盆地东部边缘呈南北延伸。然而,盆地目前的轮廓是由其东部边缘的显著构造变形和西部的地层挤压和侵蚀截断所形成的。因此,盆地的平面形式可能会误导盆地的原始形状和范围。通过分析1000多个钻孔的电缆测井数据,我们绘制了等差线图、净砂厚度图和净-粗图,为Bowen盆地三组上二叠世地层(Peawaddy组、Black Alley页岩组和Bandanna组)提供了一套新的古地理图。这些地图使用来自露头的古水流数据进一步细化,并与盆地不同部分的测井垂直剖面进行验证。三个地层的等差线图显示,在塔鲁姆海槽,沿构造东缘,等高线突然截断。这一模式被解释为盆地东部边缘在收缩变形过程中地层受到明显侵蚀的证据。基于这些发现,我们假设塔鲁姆槽向斜轴并不代表原来的前深轴,我们认为它位于更东边,被侵蚀切除了。倾向于砂的沉积体系的配置,以及构造盆地边界外的上二叠统地层的保存,支持了盆地原始东部沉积边缘比现在的构造边界向东延伸更远的假设。同样,西缘地层的截断和西覆表明,盆地原来的西边界超出了现在的边缘。根据截断等等值线和其他标准,我们估计盆地的保存面积约为原始面积的50%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Misleading Basin Margins—Analysis of the Upper Permian Succession in the Retroarc Foreland Bowen Basin of Northeast Australia

Misleading Basin Margins—Analysis of the Upper Permian Succession in the Retroarc Foreland Bowen Basin of Northeast Australia

The meridional, Permo–Triassic Bowen Basin of NE Australia became a retroarc foreland basin in the late Permian, with a mapped foredeep axis (Taroom Trough) running north–south adjacent to the eastern edge of the basin. The present outline of the basin is, nonetheless, shaped by significant structural deformation along its eastern margin, and stratigraphic pinch-outs and erosional truncation in the west. The plan form of the basin thus gives a potentially misleading representation of the basin's original shape and extent. By analysing wireline log data from over 1000 drillholes, we developed isochore, net sand thickness, and net-to-gross maps, which inform a new set of palaeogeographical maps for the three upper Permian formations of the Bowen Basin (Peawaddy Formation, Black Alley Shale, and Bandanna Formation, in ascending order). These maps were further refined using palaeocurrent data from outcrops and validated against logged vertical sections from various parts of the basin. Isochore plots for the three formations indicate abrupt truncation of contour lines along the structural eastern margin, in the Taroom Trough. This pattern is interpreted as evidence of significant erosion of stratigraphy along the eastern basin margin during contractional deformation. Based on these findings, we posit that the Taroom Trough synclinal axis does not represent the original foredeep axis, which we propose was located farther east and was erosionally excised. The configurations of sand-prone depositional systems, and the preservation of upper Permian strata outside the structural basin boundaries, support the hypothesis that the original eastern depositional edge of the basin extended farther east than its current structural boundary. Similarly, truncation and westward onlap of formations along the western margin suggest that the basin's original western boundary lay beyond its present margin. Based on the truncated isochores and other criteria, we estimate that the preserved part of the basin is ~50% of its original area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Basin Research
Basin Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
9.40%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Basin Research is an international journal which aims to publish original, high impact research papers on sedimentary basin systems. We view integrated, interdisciplinary research as being essential for the advancement of the subject area; therefore, we do not seek manuscripts focused purely on sedimentology, structural geology, or geophysics that have a natural home in specialist journals. Rather, we seek manuscripts that treat sedimentary basins as multi-component systems that require a multi-faceted approach to advance our understanding of their development. During deposition and subsidence we are concerned with large-scale geodynamic processes, heat flow, fluid flow, strain distribution, seismic and sequence stratigraphy, modelling, burial and inversion histories. In addition, we view the development of the source area, in terms of drainage networks, climate, erosion, denudation and sediment routing systems as vital to sedimentary basin systems. The underpinning requirement is that a contribution should be of interest to earth scientists of more than one discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信