Jasmin Naher, Christopher R. Fielding, Mike A. Martin
{"title":"误导盆地边缘——澳大利亚东北部弧后前陆Bowen盆地上二叠统演替分析","authors":"Jasmin Naher, Christopher R. Fielding, Mike A. Martin","doi":"10.1111/bre.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The meridional, Permo–Triassic Bowen Basin of NE Australia became a retroarc foreland basin in the late Permian, with a mapped foredeep axis (Taroom Trough) running north–south adjacent to the eastern edge of the basin. The present outline of the basin is, nonetheless, shaped by significant structural deformation along its eastern margin, and stratigraphic pinch-outs and erosional truncation in the west. The plan form of the basin thus gives a potentially misleading representation of the basin's original shape and extent. By analysing wireline log data from over 1000 drillholes, we developed isochore, net sand thickness, and net-to-gross maps, which inform a new set of palaeogeographical maps for the three upper Permian formations of the Bowen Basin (Peawaddy Formation, Black Alley Shale, and Bandanna Formation, in ascending order). These maps were further refined using palaeocurrent data from outcrops and validated against logged vertical sections from various parts of the basin. Isochore plots for the three formations indicate abrupt truncation of contour lines along the structural eastern margin, in the Taroom Trough. This pattern is interpreted as evidence of significant erosion of stratigraphy along the eastern basin margin during contractional deformation. Based on these findings, we posit that the Taroom Trough synclinal axis does not represent the original foredeep axis, which we propose was located farther east and was erosionally excised. The configurations of sand-prone depositional systems, and the preservation of upper Permian strata outside the structural basin boundaries, support the hypothesis that the original eastern depositional edge of the basin extended farther east than its current structural boundary. Similarly, truncation and westward onlap of formations along the western margin suggest that the basin's original western boundary lay beyond its present margin. Based on the truncated isochores and other criteria, we estimate that the preserved part of the basin is ~50% of its original area.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8712,"journal":{"name":"Basin Research","volume":"37 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Misleading Basin Margins—Analysis of the Upper Permian Succession in the Retroarc Foreland Bowen Basin of Northeast Australia\",\"authors\":\"Jasmin Naher, Christopher R. Fielding, Mike A. Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bre.70033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The meridional, Permo–Triassic Bowen Basin of NE Australia became a retroarc foreland basin in the late Permian, with a mapped foredeep axis (Taroom Trough) running north–south adjacent to the eastern edge of the basin. The present outline of the basin is, nonetheless, shaped by significant structural deformation along its eastern margin, and stratigraphic pinch-outs and erosional truncation in the west. The plan form of the basin thus gives a potentially misleading representation of the basin's original shape and extent. By analysing wireline log data from over 1000 drillholes, we developed isochore, net sand thickness, and net-to-gross maps, which inform a new set of palaeogeographical maps for the three upper Permian formations of the Bowen Basin (Peawaddy Formation, Black Alley Shale, and Bandanna Formation, in ascending order). These maps were further refined using palaeocurrent data from outcrops and validated against logged vertical sections from various parts of the basin. Isochore plots for the three formations indicate abrupt truncation of contour lines along the structural eastern margin, in the Taroom Trough. This pattern is interpreted as evidence of significant erosion of stratigraphy along the eastern basin margin during contractional deformation. Based on these findings, we posit that the Taroom Trough synclinal axis does not represent the original foredeep axis, which we propose was located farther east and was erosionally excised. The configurations of sand-prone depositional systems, and the preservation of upper Permian strata outside the structural basin boundaries, support the hypothesis that the original eastern depositional edge of the basin extended farther east than its current structural boundary. Similarly, truncation and westward onlap of formations along the western margin suggest that the basin's original western boundary lay beyond its present margin. Based on the truncated isochores and other criteria, we estimate that the preserved part of the basin is ~50% of its original area.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Basin Research\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Basin Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bre.70033\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basin Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bre.70033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Misleading Basin Margins—Analysis of the Upper Permian Succession in the Retroarc Foreland Bowen Basin of Northeast Australia
The meridional, Permo–Triassic Bowen Basin of NE Australia became a retroarc foreland basin in the late Permian, with a mapped foredeep axis (Taroom Trough) running north–south adjacent to the eastern edge of the basin. The present outline of the basin is, nonetheless, shaped by significant structural deformation along its eastern margin, and stratigraphic pinch-outs and erosional truncation in the west. The plan form of the basin thus gives a potentially misleading representation of the basin's original shape and extent. By analysing wireline log data from over 1000 drillholes, we developed isochore, net sand thickness, and net-to-gross maps, which inform a new set of palaeogeographical maps for the three upper Permian formations of the Bowen Basin (Peawaddy Formation, Black Alley Shale, and Bandanna Formation, in ascending order). These maps were further refined using palaeocurrent data from outcrops and validated against logged vertical sections from various parts of the basin. Isochore plots for the three formations indicate abrupt truncation of contour lines along the structural eastern margin, in the Taroom Trough. This pattern is interpreted as evidence of significant erosion of stratigraphy along the eastern basin margin during contractional deformation. Based on these findings, we posit that the Taroom Trough synclinal axis does not represent the original foredeep axis, which we propose was located farther east and was erosionally excised. The configurations of sand-prone depositional systems, and the preservation of upper Permian strata outside the structural basin boundaries, support the hypothesis that the original eastern depositional edge of the basin extended farther east than its current structural boundary. Similarly, truncation and westward onlap of formations along the western margin suggest that the basin's original western boundary lay beyond its present margin. Based on the truncated isochores and other criteria, we estimate that the preserved part of the basin is ~50% of its original area.
期刊介绍:
Basin Research is an international journal which aims to publish original, high impact research papers on sedimentary basin systems. We view integrated, interdisciplinary research as being essential for the advancement of the subject area; therefore, we do not seek manuscripts focused purely on sedimentology, structural geology, or geophysics that have a natural home in specialist journals. Rather, we seek manuscripts that treat sedimentary basins as multi-component systems that require a multi-faceted approach to advance our understanding of their development. During deposition and subsidence we are concerned with large-scale geodynamic processes, heat flow, fluid flow, strain distribution, seismic and sequence stratigraphy, modelling, burial and inversion histories. In addition, we view the development of the source area, in terms of drainage networks, climate, erosion, denudation and sediment routing systems as vital to sedimentary basin systems. The underpinning requirement is that a contribution should be of interest to earth scientists of more than one discipline.