儿童抑郁评定量表的纵向不变性——修订后的青少年。

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Lilian Y Li,Madeline M McGregor,Sarah E Sarkas,Aishwarya Sritharan,Lili Massac,Marissa Valdespino,Allison M Letkiewicz,Katherine Durham,Randy P Auerbach,Stewart A Shankman
{"title":"儿童抑郁评定量表的纵向不变性——修订后的青少年。","authors":"Lilian Y Li,Madeline M McGregor,Sarah E Sarkas,Aishwarya Sritharan,Lili Massac,Marissa Valdespino,Allison M Letkiewicz,Katherine Durham,Randy P Auerbach,Stewart A Shankman","doi":"10.1037/pas0001392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) is a widely used interview measure of adolescent major depression (major depressive disorder), with sum scores and their changes over time interpreted as changes in one underlying construct. This interpretation assumes that the CDRS-R measures a single construct of depression (unidimensionality) in the same way across time (longitudinal invariance)-assumptions that have yet to be established but were tested in this study. Adolescents (N = 197; ages 13-18 years old) with lifetime major depressive disorder, as well as healthy controls, completed the CDRS-R and a self-reported depression symptom measure, the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS), at baseline and 6 months follow-up. Unidimensionality of the CDRS-R at both time points was tested using the one-factor confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Longitudinal invariance of the factor structure was examined in a CFA framework, and longitudinal invariance of the construct validity was examined by testing whether the correlation between the CDRS-R and IDAS was equivalent across time. The one-factor CFA model with correlated uniqueness among the three observational items demonstrated excellent fit. Longitudinal invariance of the factor structure (invariant uniqueness) and construct validity was achieved. At both baseline and 6-month assessments, the CDRS-R demonstrated good internal consistency (αs > .89) and was highly correlated with the IDAS (> 0.70). Findings support the practice of comparing observed scores of the CDRS-R between the baseline and the 6-month assessment among adolescents. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"137 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal invariance of the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised in adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Lilian Y Li,Madeline M McGregor,Sarah E Sarkas,Aishwarya Sritharan,Lili Massac,Marissa Valdespino,Allison M Letkiewicz,Katherine Durham,Randy P Auerbach,Stewart A Shankman\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pas0001392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) is a widely used interview measure of adolescent major depression (major depressive disorder), with sum scores and their changes over time interpreted as changes in one underlying construct. This interpretation assumes that the CDRS-R measures a single construct of depression (unidimensionality) in the same way across time (longitudinal invariance)-assumptions that have yet to be established but were tested in this study. Adolescents (N = 197; ages 13-18 years old) with lifetime major depressive disorder, as well as healthy controls, completed the CDRS-R and a self-reported depression symptom measure, the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS), at baseline and 6 months follow-up. Unidimensionality of the CDRS-R at both time points was tested using the one-factor confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Longitudinal invariance of the factor structure was examined in a CFA framework, and longitudinal invariance of the construct validity was examined by testing whether the correlation between the CDRS-R and IDAS was equivalent across time. The one-factor CFA model with correlated uniqueness among the three observational items demonstrated excellent fit. Longitudinal invariance of the factor structure (invariant uniqueness) and construct validity was achieved. At both baseline and 6-month assessments, the CDRS-R demonstrated good internal consistency (αs > .89) and was highly correlated with the IDAS (> 0.70). Findings support the practice of comparing observed scores of the CDRS-R between the baseline and the 6-month assessment among adolescents. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":20770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Assessment\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001392\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001392","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童抑郁评定量表修订版(CDRS-R)是一种广泛使用的青少年重度抑郁(重度抑郁障碍)的访谈测量方法,其总得分及其随时间的变化被解释为一个潜在结构的变化。这种解释假设CDRS-R以相同的方式测量抑郁的单一结构(单维性),跨越时间(纵向不变性),这一假设尚未建立,但在本研究中得到了验证。青少年(N = 197;年龄13-18岁的终身重度抑郁症患者,以及健康对照者,在基线和6个月的随访中完成CDRS-R和自我报告的抑郁症状测量,抑郁和焦虑症状量表(IDAS)。使用单因素验证性因子分析(CFA)对两个时间点的CDRS-R的单维性进行检验。在CFA框架中检验因子结构的纵向不变性,并通过检验CDRS-R与IDAS之间的相关性是否跨时间相等来检验结构效度的纵向不变性。单因素CFA模型在三个观测项之间具有相关唯一性,拟合效果良好。因子结构的纵向不变性(不变性唯一性)和构念效度得到了保证。在基线和6个月的评估中,CDRS-R表现出良好的内部一致性(αs > 0.89),并与IDAS高度相关(> 0.70)。研究结果支持在青少年中比较基线和6个月评估时观察到的CDRS-R分数的做法。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Longitudinal invariance of the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised in adolescents.
The Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) is a widely used interview measure of adolescent major depression (major depressive disorder), with sum scores and their changes over time interpreted as changes in one underlying construct. This interpretation assumes that the CDRS-R measures a single construct of depression (unidimensionality) in the same way across time (longitudinal invariance)-assumptions that have yet to be established but were tested in this study. Adolescents (N = 197; ages 13-18 years old) with lifetime major depressive disorder, as well as healthy controls, completed the CDRS-R and a self-reported depression symptom measure, the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS), at baseline and 6 months follow-up. Unidimensionality of the CDRS-R at both time points was tested using the one-factor confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Longitudinal invariance of the factor structure was examined in a CFA framework, and longitudinal invariance of the construct validity was examined by testing whether the correlation between the CDRS-R and IDAS was equivalent across time. The one-factor CFA model with correlated uniqueness among the three observational items demonstrated excellent fit. Longitudinal invariance of the factor structure (invariant uniqueness) and construct validity was achieved. At both baseline and 6-month assessments, the CDRS-R demonstrated good internal consistency (αs > .89) and was highly correlated with the IDAS (> 0.70). Findings support the practice of comparing observed scores of the CDRS-R between the baseline and the 6-month assessment among adolescents. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信