{"title":"作秀:通过faalade的比喻解读政府空洞创新的例证。","authors":"Santtu Räisänen","doi":"10.1177/03063127251337781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines meaning-making in a governmental technology demonstration, and its significance in the production of a durable artifice of innovation. STS literature has largely engaged with technology demonstrations in the context of commercial technology products, and through the lens of public knowledge-making: as events that elicit credence in matters-of-fact. I contribute to this discussion by turning attention towards a new context, governmental innovation, and approaching the format, not through its epistemics, but rather its aesthetic and affective registers. Over the course of a project aimed at building a governmental software system called the AuroraAI Network, to be used for the empowerment of welfare subjects, the Department of Government ICT at the Finnish Ministry of Finance produced a series of four highly theatrical events that sought to demonstrate the development of the AI system. Using social-semiotic performance analysis, I analyse these events as a kind of façade, one that presents the trappings of technology demonstration, but rather than advancing specific technical matters-of-fact, produces an affective and aesthetic sensibility of government innovation. By mobilizing the metaphor of façade, this research shows how empty innovation is made durable and successful.","PeriodicalId":51152,"journal":{"name":"Social Studies of Science","volume":"38 1","pages":"3063127251337781"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making a show of it: Reading demonstrations of empty government innovation through the metaphor of façade.\",\"authors\":\"Santtu Räisänen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03063127251337781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines meaning-making in a governmental technology demonstration, and its significance in the production of a durable artifice of innovation. STS literature has largely engaged with technology demonstrations in the context of commercial technology products, and through the lens of public knowledge-making: as events that elicit credence in matters-of-fact. I contribute to this discussion by turning attention towards a new context, governmental innovation, and approaching the format, not through its epistemics, but rather its aesthetic and affective registers. Over the course of a project aimed at building a governmental software system called the AuroraAI Network, to be used for the empowerment of welfare subjects, the Department of Government ICT at the Finnish Ministry of Finance produced a series of four highly theatrical events that sought to demonstrate the development of the AI system. Using social-semiotic performance analysis, I analyse these events as a kind of façade, one that presents the trappings of technology demonstration, but rather than advancing specific technical matters-of-fact, produces an affective and aesthetic sensibility of government innovation. By mobilizing the metaphor of façade, this research shows how empty innovation is made durable and successful.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Studies of Science\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"3063127251337781\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Studies of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127251337781\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Studies of Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127251337781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Making a show of it: Reading demonstrations of empty government innovation through the metaphor of façade.
This article examines meaning-making in a governmental technology demonstration, and its significance in the production of a durable artifice of innovation. STS literature has largely engaged with technology demonstrations in the context of commercial technology products, and through the lens of public knowledge-making: as events that elicit credence in matters-of-fact. I contribute to this discussion by turning attention towards a new context, governmental innovation, and approaching the format, not through its epistemics, but rather its aesthetic and affective registers. Over the course of a project aimed at building a governmental software system called the AuroraAI Network, to be used for the empowerment of welfare subjects, the Department of Government ICT at the Finnish Ministry of Finance produced a series of four highly theatrical events that sought to demonstrate the development of the AI system. Using social-semiotic performance analysis, I analyse these events as a kind of façade, one that presents the trappings of technology demonstration, but rather than advancing specific technical matters-of-fact, produces an affective and aesthetic sensibility of government innovation. By mobilizing the metaphor of façade, this research shows how empty innovation is made durable and successful.
期刊介绍:
Social Studies of Science is an international peer reviewed journal that encourages submissions of original research on science, technology and medicine. The journal is multidisciplinary, publishing work from a range of fields including: political science, sociology, economics, history, philosophy, psychology social anthropology, legal and educational disciplines. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)