Ali Sharbatian, Akhilesh Kamtikar, Danesh Ashouri Vajari, Thomas Stieglitz
{"title":"电极-组织界面微动应变安全裕度评估:COMSOL有限元分析","authors":"Ali Sharbatian, Akhilesh Kamtikar, Danesh Ashouri Vajari, Thomas Stieglitz","doi":"10.1002/admi.202401001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Brain movement significantly impacts the biocompatibility of neural probes, primarily due to continuous loading and strain on neural tissue. This study investigates the strain profile at the electrode–tissue interface under various brain displacements—vertical, lateral, diagonal, and torque—across different brain models (linear elastic, hyperelastic, and viscoelastic). The safety margin for tissue damage is assessed by evaluating a 5% strain threshold using two probe widths (30 µm and 100 µm) in tethered and floating configurations. The probe dimensions are informed by previously developed devices implanted in rats for 12 weeks, allowing to correlate the findings with existing immunohistochemical data. A comprehensive simulation studies accounting for various conditions, such as different brain displacements and physics, has not been reported elsewhere. These results challenge the conventional 5% strain threshold for tissue damage, revealing that strains below this critical limit may still pose risks depending on probe geometry and brain model. Furthermore, these simulations underscore the necessity of size-dependent micromotion models for accurate predictions in untethered conditions. This work highlights the feasibility of integrating immunohistological data into simulation studies, offering valuable insights for researchers while minimizing the need for extensive animal testing during initial probe design phases.</p>","PeriodicalId":115,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Materials Interfaces","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/admi.202401001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Safety Margin for Micromotion-Induced Strain at Electrode–Tissue Interface: A Finite Element Analysis via COMSOL\",\"authors\":\"Ali Sharbatian, Akhilesh Kamtikar, Danesh Ashouri Vajari, Thomas Stieglitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/admi.202401001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Brain movement significantly impacts the biocompatibility of neural probes, primarily due to continuous loading and strain on neural tissue. This study investigates the strain profile at the electrode–tissue interface under various brain displacements—vertical, lateral, diagonal, and torque—across different brain models (linear elastic, hyperelastic, and viscoelastic). The safety margin for tissue damage is assessed by evaluating a 5% strain threshold using two probe widths (30 µm and 100 µm) in tethered and floating configurations. The probe dimensions are informed by previously developed devices implanted in rats for 12 weeks, allowing to correlate the findings with existing immunohistochemical data. A comprehensive simulation studies accounting for various conditions, such as different brain displacements and physics, has not been reported elsewhere. These results challenge the conventional 5% strain threshold for tissue damage, revealing that strains below this critical limit may still pose risks depending on probe geometry and brain model. Furthermore, these simulations underscore the necessity of size-dependent micromotion models for accurate predictions in untethered conditions. This work highlights the feasibility of integrating immunohistological data into simulation studies, offering valuable insights for researchers while minimizing the need for extensive animal testing during initial probe design phases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Materials Interfaces\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/admi.202401001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Materials Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/admi.202401001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Materials Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/admi.202401001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing the Safety Margin for Micromotion-Induced Strain at Electrode–Tissue Interface: A Finite Element Analysis via COMSOL
Brain movement significantly impacts the biocompatibility of neural probes, primarily due to continuous loading and strain on neural tissue. This study investigates the strain profile at the electrode–tissue interface under various brain displacements—vertical, lateral, diagonal, and torque—across different brain models (linear elastic, hyperelastic, and viscoelastic). The safety margin for tissue damage is assessed by evaluating a 5% strain threshold using two probe widths (30 µm and 100 µm) in tethered and floating configurations. The probe dimensions are informed by previously developed devices implanted in rats for 12 weeks, allowing to correlate the findings with existing immunohistochemical data. A comprehensive simulation studies accounting for various conditions, such as different brain displacements and physics, has not been reported elsewhere. These results challenge the conventional 5% strain threshold for tissue damage, revealing that strains below this critical limit may still pose risks depending on probe geometry and brain model. Furthermore, these simulations underscore the necessity of size-dependent micromotion models for accurate predictions in untethered conditions. This work highlights the feasibility of integrating immunohistological data into simulation studies, offering valuable insights for researchers while minimizing the need for extensive animal testing during initial probe design phases.
期刊介绍:
Advanced Materials Interfaces publishes top-level research on interface technologies and effects. Considering any interface formed between solids, liquids, and gases, the journal ensures an interdisciplinary blend of physics, chemistry, materials science, and life sciences. Advanced Materials Interfaces was launched in 2014 and received an Impact Factor of 4.834 in 2018.
The scope of Advanced Materials Interfaces is dedicated to interfaces and surfaces that play an essential role in virtually all materials and devices. Physics, chemistry, materials science and life sciences blend to encourage new, cross-pollinating ideas, which will drive forward our understanding of the processes at the interface.
Advanced Materials Interfaces covers all topics in interface-related research:
Oil / water separation,
Applications of nanostructured materials,
2D materials and heterostructures,
Surfaces and interfaces in organic electronic devices,
Catalysis and membranes,
Self-assembly and nanopatterned surfaces,
Composite and coating materials,
Biointerfaces for technical and medical applications.
Advanced Materials Interfaces provides a forum for topics on surface and interface science with a wide choice of formats: Reviews, Full Papers, and Communications, as well as Progress Reports and Research News.