在法国EDEN队列中不良童年经历与产前心理健康之间的关联:累积、以人为中心和维度方法

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Sara Avendano, Muriel Tafflet, Cedric Galéra, Laetitia Davidovic, Barbara Heude, Judith van der Waerden
{"title":"在法国EDEN队列中不良童年经历与产前心理健康之间的关联:累积、以人为中心和维度方法","authors":"Sara Avendano,&nbsp;Muriel Tafflet,&nbsp;Cedric Galéra,&nbsp;Laetitia Davidovic,&nbsp;Barbara Heude,&nbsp;Judith van der Waerden","doi":"10.1155/da/1295206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) may negatively affect prenatal mental health. However, the use of a cumulative ACEs score may obscure the identification of which specific types of adversity are most strongly associated with unfavorable mental health outcomes.</p>\n <p><b>Aim:</b> This study aims to evaluate the association between ACEs and prenatal symptoms of depression and anxiety using a cumulative score, a person-centered approach, and the dimensional model of adversity and psychopathology (DMAP).</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Data were collected from 1887 pregnant women in the French Etude des Déterminants du développement et de la santé de l’ENfant (EDEN) cohort. To operationalize our exposure, we calculated a cumulative ACE score, threat and deprivation scores, and conducted latent class analysis (LCA). Depressive and anxious symptoms were assessed with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory state subscale (STAI-S) questionnaires, using cutoffs of 16 and 38 indicating high symptoms. Participants were categorized into four outcome groups: (1) no symptoms, (2) high depressive symptoms only, (3) high anxious symptoms only, and (4) comorbid high symptoms. Multinomial regressions were performed.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> LCA identified three ACE classes: low-risk, family discordance, and multidimensional adversity. Women reporting two or more ACEs had higher odds of depressive and comorbid symptoms, compared to those with zero ACEs. Compared to the low-risk class, women in the family discordance class had increased odds of high depressive symptoms (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.80 [1.33, 2.56]) and comorbid high symptoms (aOR [95% CI] = 2.04 [1.43, 2.89]). Threat experiences were significantly linked to high depressive symptoms (aOR [95% CI] = 1.48 [1.22, 1.79]) and comorbid high symptoms (aOR [95% CI] = 1.53 [1.25, 1.87]).</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> Using the DMAP and LCA approaches, we found that ACEs related to the familial environment and relationships during childhood were most strongly associated with prenatal high depressive and comorbid symptoms. This highlights the importance of operationalizing ACEs beyond a cumulative score to better capture their role in the development of prenatal mental health difficulties.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/1295206","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Prenatal Mental Health in the French EDEN Cohort: Cumulative, Person-Centered, and Dimensional Approaches\",\"authors\":\"Sara Avendano,&nbsp;Muriel Tafflet,&nbsp;Cedric Galéra,&nbsp;Laetitia Davidovic,&nbsp;Barbara Heude,&nbsp;Judith van der Waerden\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/da/1295206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Background:</b> Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) may negatively affect prenatal mental health. However, the use of a cumulative ACEs score may obscure the identification of which specific types of adversity are most strongly associated with unfavorable mental health outcomes.</p>\\n <p><b>Aim:</b> This study aims to evaluate the association between ACEs and prenatal symptoms of depression and anxiety using a cumulative score, a person-centered approach, and the dimensional model of adversity and psychopathology (DMAP).</p>\\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Data were collected from 1887 pregnant women in the French Etude des Déterminants du développement et de la santé de l’ENfant (EDEN) cohort. To operationalize our exposure, we calculated a cumulative ACE score, threat and deprivation scores, and conducted latent class analysis (LCA). Depressive and anxious symptoms were assessed with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory state subscale (STAI-S) questionnaires, using cutoffs of 16 and 38 indicating high symptoms. Participants were categorized into four outcome groups: (1) no symptoms, (2) high depressive symptoms only, (3) high anxious symptoms only, and (4) comorbid high symptoms. Multinomial regressions were performed.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> LCA identified three ACE classes: low-risk, family discordance, and multidimensional adversity. Women reporting two or more ACEs had higher odds of depressive and comorbid symptoms, compared to those with zero ACEs. Compared to the low-risk class, women in the family discordance class had increased odds of high depressive symptoms (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.80 [1.33, 2.56]) and comorbid high symptoms (aOR [95% CI] = 2.04 [1.43, 2.89]). Threat experiences were significantly linked to high depressive symptoms (aOR [95% CI] = 1.48 [1.22, 1.79]) and comorbid high symptoms (aOR [95% CI] = 1.53 [1.25, 1.87]).</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> Using the DMAP and LCA approaches, we found that ACEs related to the familial environment and relationships during childhood were most strongly associated with prenatal high depressive and comorbid symptoms. This highlights the importance of operationalizing ACEs beyond a cumulative score to better capture their role in the development of prenatal mental health difficulties.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/1295206\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/1295206\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/1295206","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不良童年经历(ace)可能对产前心理健康产生负面影响。然而,累积ace分数的使用可能会模糊哪些特定类型的逆境与不利的心理健康结果最密切相关的识别。目的:本研究旨在运用累积评分法、以人为本的方法和逆境与精神病理维度模型(DMAP)来评估ace与产前抑郁和焦虑症状的关系。方法:收集来自法国《儿童健康与健康研究》(EDEN)队列的1887名孕妇的资料。为了操作我们的暴露,我们计算了累积ACE分数、威胁和剥夺分数,并进行了潜在类分析(LCA)。采用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)和状态-特质焦虑量表状态子量表(STAI-S)问卷对抑郁和焦虑症状进行评估,使用16和38的截止值表示高症状。参与者被分为四个结果组:(1)无症状,(2)只有高抑郁症状,(3)只有高焦虑症状,(4)共病高症状。进行多项回归。结果:LCA识别出三种ACE类型:低风险、家庭不和谐和多维逆境。与没有经历过ace的女性相比,经历过两次或两次以上ace的女性抑郁和共病症状的几率更高。与低风险组相比,家庭不一致组的女性出现高抑郁症状的几率增加(调整后的优势比[aOR] 95%置信区间[CI] = 1.80[1.33, 2.56]),并伴有高抑郁症状(aOR [95% CI] = 2.04[1.43, 2.89])。威胁经历与高抑郁症状(aOR [95% CI] = 1.48[1.22, 1.79])和共病高抑郁症状(aOR [95% CI] = 1.53[1.25, 1.87])显著相关。结论:使用DMAP和LCA方法,我们发现与童年时期家庭环境和关系相关的ace与产前高抑郁和合并症症状的相关性最强。这突出了在累积评分之外实施ace的重要性,以便更好地捕捉它们在产前心理健康困难发展中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Associations Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Prenatal Mental Health in the French EDEN Cohort: Cumulative, Person-Centered, and Dimensional Approaches

Associations Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Prenatal Mental Health in the French EDEN Cohort: Cumulative, Person-Centered, and Dimensional Approaches

Background: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) may negatively affect prenatal mental health. However, the use of a cumulative ACEs score may obscure the identification of which specific types of adversity are most strongly associated with unfavorable mental health outcomes.

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the association between ACEs and prenatal symptoms of depression and anxiety using a cumulative score, a person-centered approach, and the dimensional model of adversity and psychopathology (DMAP).

Methods: Data were collected from 1887 pregnant women in the French Etude des Déterminants du développement et de la santé de l’ENfant (EDEN) cohort. To operationalize our exposure, we calculated a cumulative ACE score, threat and deprivation scores, and conducted latent class analysis (LCA). Depressive and anxious symptoms were assessed with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory state subscale (STAI-S) questionnaires, using cutoffs of 16 and 38 indicating high symptoms. Participants were categorized into four outcome groups: (1) no symptoms, (2) high depressive symptoms only, (3) high anxious symptoms only, and (4) comorbid high symptoms. Multinomial regressions were performed.

Results: LCA identified three ACE classes: low-risk, family discordance, and multidimensional adversity. Women reporting two or more ACEs had higher odds of depressive and comorbid symptoms, compared to those with zero ACEs. Compared to the low-risk class, women in the family discordance class had increased odds of high depressive symptoms (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.80 [1.33, 2.56]) and comorbid high symptoms (aOR [95% CI] = 2.04 [1.43, 2.89]). Threat experiences were significantly linked to high depressive symptoms (aOR [95% CI] = 1.48 [1.22, 1.79]) and comorbid high symptoms (aOR [95% CI] = 1.53 [1.25, 1.87]).

Conclusion: Using the DMAP and LCA approaches, we found that ACEs related to the familial environment and relationships during childhood were most strongly associated with prenatal high depressive and comorbid symptoms. This highlights the importance of operationalizing ACEs beyond a cumulative score to better capture their role in the development of prenatal mental health difficulties.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信