E. Astafyeva, B. Maletckii, M. Förster, I. D. Ouar, J. D. Huba, M. R. Hairston, W. R. Coley
{"title":"2024年5月10-11日地磁超级风暴的电动力学和电离层之谜","authors":"E. Astafyeva, B. Maletckii, M. Förster, I. D. Ouar, J. D. Huba, M. R. Hairston, W. R. Coley","doi":"10.1029/2024JA033284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>On 10 May 2024, a powerful coronal mass ejection arrived at Earth at 17:05UT and caused a major geomagnetic storm. With the minimum SYM-H excursion of −497 nT (5-min data), this storm is the largest geomagnetic disturbance since March 1989, and can be categorized as a superstorm. In this work, by using ground-based and space-borne instruments, we focus on unusual aspects of the electrodynamic and ionospheric response to the May 2024 storm at middle and low latitudes. Between the storm onset at 17:05UT, and until ∼19:40UT, we observed signatures of strong unshielded prompt penetration electric fields (PPEF), which caused an increase of the equatorial ExB drifts up to 95 m/s. This led to the occurrence of a strong ionospheric super-fountain effect. The local pre-noon sector was the first to respond to the PPEF, with a very rapid increase of the ionization and the EIA development in the local morning sector. Whereas, in the afternoon-evening sector the ionosphere responded with ∼2 hr of delay, and the response continued to intensify even after the equatorial ExB drifts had dropped to undisturbed values. The development of such a powerful super-fountain effect without or with little electrodynamic forcing is difficult to explain, but it could be due to storm-time meridional and zonal thermospheric winds. During the early recovery phase of the storm, a second positive ionospheric storm occurred over the Australian-West Pacific region in the local late afternoon to pre-midnight sector, driven by another ionospheric uplift associated with the occurrence of smaller-amplitude equatorial upward ExB drifts.</p>","PeriodicalId":15894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","volume":"130 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JA033284","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrodynamic and Ionospheric Puzzles of the 10–11 May 2024 Geomagnetic Superstorm\",\"authors\":\"E. Astafyeva, B. Maletckii, M. Förster, I. D. Ouar, J. D. Huba, M. R. Hairston, W. R. Coley\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JA033284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>On 10 May 2024, a powerful coronal mass ejection arrived at Earth at 17:05UT and caused a major geomagnetic storm. With the minimum SYM-H excursion of −497 nT (5-min data), this storm is the largest geomagnetic disturbance since March 1989, and can be categorized as a superstorm. In this work, by using ground-based and space-borne instruments, we focus on unusual aspects of the electrodynamic and ionospheric response to the May 2024 storm at middle and low latitudes. Between the storm onset at 17:05UT, and until ∼19:40UT, we observed signatures of strong unshielded prompt penetration electric fields (PPEF), which caused an increase of the equatorial ExB drifts up to 95 m/s. This led to the occurrence of a strong ionospheric super-fountain effect. The local pre-noon sector was the first to respond to the PPEF, with a very rapid increase of the ionization and the EIA development in the local morning sector. Whereas, in the afternoon-evening sector the ionosphere responded with ∼2 hr of delay, and the response continued to intensify even after the equatorial ExB drifts had dropped to undisturbed values. The development of such a powerful super-fountain effect without or with little electrodynamic forcing is difficult to explain, but it could be due to storm-time meridional and zonal thermospheric winds. During the early recovery phase of the storm, a second positive ionospheric storm occurred over the Australian-West Pacific region in the local late afternoon to pre-midnight sector, driven by another ionospheric uplift associated with the occurrence of smaller-amplitude equatorial upward ExB drifts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics\",\"volume\":\"130 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JA033284\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA033284\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA033284","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Electrodynamic and Ionospheric Puzzles of the 10–11 May 2024 Geomagnetic Superstorm
On 10 May 2024, a powerful coronal mass ejection arrived at Earth at 17:05UT and caused a major geomagnetic storm. With the minimum SYM-H excursion of −497 nT (5-min data), this storm is the largest geomagnetic disturbance since March 1989, and can be categorized as a superstorm. In this work, by using ground-based and space-borne instruments, we focus on unusual aspects of the electrodynamic and ionospheric response to the May 2024 storm at middle and low latitudes. Between the storm onset at 17:05UT, and until ∼19:40UT, we observed signatures of strong unshielded prompt penetration electric fields (PPEF), which caused an increase of the equatorial ExB drifts up to 95 m/s. This led to the occurrence of a strong ionospheric super-fountain effect. The local pre-noon sector was the first to respond to the PPEF, with a very rapid increase of the ionization and the EIA development in the local morning sector. Whereas, in the afternoon-evening sector the ionosphere responded with ∼2 hr of delay, and the response continued to intensify even after the equatorial ExB drifts had dropped to undisturbed values. The development of such a powerful super-fountain effect without or with little electrodynamic forcing is difficult to explain, but it could be due to storm-time meridional and zonal thermospheric winds. During the early recovery phase of the storm, a second positive ionospheric storm occurred over the Australian-West Pacific region in the local late afternoon to pre-midnight sector, driven by another ionospheric uplift associated with the occurrence of smaller-amplitude equatorial upward ExB drifts.