Anna S. Wagner, Marlena Milzer, Imad Maatouk, Lena Wehlen, Senta Kiermeier, Karen Steindorf, Martina E. Schmidt
{"title":"癌症相关疲劳管理中的患者-专业和专业间沟通障碍：多学科医疗保健专业人员的单中心焦点小组研究","authors":"Anna S. Wagner, Marlena Milzer, Imad Maatouk, Lena Wehlen, Senta Kiermeier, Karen Steindorf, Martina E. Schmidt","doi":"10.1155/ecc/1179081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Unfavorable patient–professional and interprofessional communication have been identified as barriers to guideline-oriented, effective care of cancer-related fatigue (CRF).</p>\n <p><b>Objectives:</b> To illuminate these interactional challenges, this study aimed to explore the perceptions of healthcare professionals (HCPs) regarding (a) handling patients with CRF, (b) challenges in patients’ everyday life, and (c) suggestions to improve CRF management.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Two focus groups were recruited at the University Hospital Würzburg, Germany. Participants were HCPs working with cancer patients in the fields of medicine (<i>n</i> = 4), nursing (<i>n</i> = 3), and psycho-oncology (<i>n</i> = 4). Data were subjected to qualitative content analysis.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> A circular model was generated, illustrating the potential interaction between HCPs and patients with CRF from the HCP perspective. Concerns of HCPs, such as low self-efficacy in counseling on CRF and feelings of inadequacy through lack of feedback, interplay with patients’ suffering, resulting frustration, and pressure of expectation among others. This complicates empathic exchange, which HCPs actually highlight to meet patients’ needs and realize effective CRF management. To improve CRF management, HCPs suggested implementing standardized operating procedures to clarify responsibilities and to promote interprofessional collaboration in CRF care. Further, they expressed the need for professional training on CRF and on how to communicate with patients in this respect. Additionally, HCPs pointed out the necessity of cultivating reflective practice as HCPs to enhance empathy toward patients presenting CRF.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> The interprofessional focus-group discussions improved our understanding of the challenges HCPs may perceive in managing CRF, outlined tasks on the institutional level to be addressed in the future, and provided suggestions for immediate adjustments on the individual level.</p>\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04921644</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11953,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ecc/1179081","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient–Professional and Interprofessional Communication Barriers in Cancer-Related Fatigue Management: A Monocentric Focus-Group Study Among Multidisciplinary Healthcare Professionals\",\"authors\":\"Anna S. Wagner, Marlena Milzer, Imad Maatouk, Lena Wehlen, Senta Kiermeier, Karen Steindorf, Martina E. Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ecc/1179081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Background:</b> Unfavorable patient–professional and interprofessional communication have been identified as barriers to guideline-oriented, effective care of cancer-related fatigue (CRF).</p>\\n <p><b>Objectives:</b> To illuminate these interactional challenges, this study aimed to explore the perceptions of healthcare professionals (HCPs) regarding (a) handling patients with CRF, (b) challenges in patients’ everyday life, and (c) suggestions to improve CRF management.</p>\\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Two focus groups were recruited at the University Hospital Würzburg, Germany. Participants were HCPs working with cancer patients in the fields of medicine (<i>n</i> = 4), nursing (<i>n</i> = 3), and psycho-oncology (<i>n</i> = 4). Data were subjected to qualitative content analysis.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> A circular model was generated, illustrating the potential interaction between HCPs and patients with CRF from the HCP perspective. Concerns of HCPs, such as low self-efficacy in counseling on CRF and feelings of inadequacy through lack of feedback, interplay with patients’ suffering, resulting frustration, and pressure of expectation among others. This complicates empathic exchange, which HCPs actually highlight to meet patients’ needs and realize effective CRF management. To improve CRF management, HCPs suggested implementing standardized operating procedures to clarify responsibilities and to promote interprofessional collaboration in CRF care. Further, they expressed the need for professional training on CRF and on how to communicate with patients in this respect. Additionally, HCPs pointed out the necessity of cultivating reflective practice as HCPs to enhance empathy toward patients presenting CRF.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> The interprofessional focus-group discussions improved our understanding of the challenges HCPs may perceive in managing CRF, outlined tasks on the institutional level to be addressed in the future, and provided suggestions for immediate adjustments on the individual level.</p>\\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04921644</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ecc/1179081\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ecc/1179081\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ecc/1179081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient–Professional and Interprofessional Communication Barriers in Cancer-Related Fatigue Management: A Monocentric Focus-Group Study Among Multidisciplinary Healthcare Professionals
Background: Unfavorable patient–professional and interprofessional communication have been identified as barriers to guideline-oriented, effective care of cancer-related fatigue (CRF).
Objectives: To illuminate these interactional challenges, this study aimed to explore the perceptions of healthcare professionals (HCPs) regarding (a) handling patients with CRF, (b) challenges in patients’ everyday life, and (c) suggestions to improve CRF management.
Methods: Two focus groups were recruited at the University Hospital Würzburg, Germany. Participants were HCPs working with cancer patients in the fields of medicine (n = 4), nursing (n = 3), and psycho-oncology (n = 4). Data were subjected to qualitative content analysis.
Results: A circular model was generated, illustrating the potential interaction between HCPs and patients with CRF from the HCP perspective. Concerns of HCPs, such as low self-efficacy in counseling on CRF and feelings of inadequacy through lack of feedback, interplay with patients’ suffering, resulting frustration, and pressure of expectation among others. This complicates empathic exchange, which HCPs actually highlight to meet patients’ needs and realize effective CRF management. To improve CRF management, HCPs suggested implementing standardized operating procedures to clarify responsibilities and to promote interprofessional collaboration in CRF care. Further, they expressed the need for professional training on CRF and on how to communicate with patients in this respect. Additionally, HCPs pointed out the necessity of cultivating reflective practice as HCPs to enhance empathy toward patients presenting CRF.
Conclusions: The interprofessional focus-group discussions improved our understanding of the challenges HCPs may perceive in managing CRF, outlined tasks on the institutional level to be addressed in the future, and provided suggestions for immediate adjustments on the individual level.
期刊介绍：
The European Journal of Cancer Care aims to encourage comprehensive, multiprofessional cancer care across Europe and internationally. It publishes original research reports, literature reviews, guest editorials, letters to the Editor and special features on current issues affecting the care of cancer patients. The Editor welcomes contributions which result from team working or collaboration between different health and social care providers, service users, patient groups and the voluntary sector in the areas of:
- Primary, secondary and tertiary care for cancer patients
- Multidisciplinary and service-user involvement in cancer care
- Rehabilitation, supportive, palliative and end of life care for cancer patients
- Policy, service development and healthcare evaluation in cancer care
- Psychosocial interventions for patients and family members
- International perspectives on cancer care
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
