可靠性及其框架和误差偏差对人车协作信任的影响

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Jue Li, Yilu Ye, Long Liu, Andreas Butz
{"title":"可靠性及其框架和误差偏差对人车协作信任的影响","authors":"Jue Li,&nbsp;Yilu Ye,&nbsp;Long Liu,&nbsp;Andreas Butz","doi":"10.1002/hfm.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>System reliability promotes trust, but may also impair human monitoring performance and in turn affects trust. This effect varies across different errors. This study examined the effect of automation reliability (100%, 75%, and 50%) and its framing (negative and positive description of reliability), and error bias (false alarm and miss) on user trust and its related factors in the automated driving system (ADS). Each participant completed 16 trials with human-vehicle collaboration task in a static driving simulator. The results showed that ADS with higher reliability positively impact user trust, but negatively impact situation awareness. Users' trust was higher in false alarm (FA) events than in miss events, but task success and situation awareness were higher in miss events. This study revealed an unusual negative correlation between trust and situational awareness in human-vehicle collaboration and provided possible insights into the internal factors of error bias in automation. Our finding has implications for reliability disclosure strategies and trust calibration.</p>","PeriodicalId":55048,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hfm.70008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Reliability, Its Framing and Error Bias on Trust in Human-Vehicle Collaboration\",\"authors\":\"Jue Li,&nbsp;Yilu Ye,&nbsp;Long Liu,&nbsp;Andreas Butz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hfm.70008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>System reliability promotes trust, but may also impair human monitoring performance and in turn affects trust. This effect varies across different errors. This study examined the effect of automation reliability (100%, 75%, and 50%) and its framing (negative and positive description of reliability), and error bias (false alarm and miss) on user trust and its related factors in the automated driving system (ADS). Each participant completed 16 trials with human-vehicle collaboration task in a static driving simulator. The results showed that ADS with higher reliability positively impact user trust, but negatively impact situation awareness. Users' trust was higher in false alarm (FA) events than in miss events, but task success and situation awareness were higher in miss events. This study revealed an unusual negative correlation between trust and situational awareness in human-vehicle collaboration and provided possible insights into the internal factors of error bias in automation. Our finding has implications for reliability disclosure strategies and trust calibration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hfm.70008\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.70008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

系统可靠性促进信任,但也可能损害人的监控性能,进而影响信任。这种效果在不同的误差中有所不同。本研究考察了自动驾驶系统(ADS)中自动化可靠性(100%、75%和50%)及其框架(可靠性的消极和积极描述)和误差偏差(误报和漏报)对用户信任及其相关因素的影响。每位参与者在静态驾驶模拟器中完成16次人车协作任务试验。结果表明,高信度的ADS对用户信任有正向影响,对情境感知有负向影响。误报事件的用户信任度高于误报事件,但误报事件的任务成功度和情境感知度高于误报事件。本研究揭示了人车协作中信任与态势感知之间不寻常的负相关关系,并为自动化中误差偏差的内部因素提供了可能的见解。我们的发现对可靠性披露策略和信任校准具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of Reliability, Its Framing and Error Bias on Trust in Human-Vehicle Collaboration

Effect of Reliability, Its Framing and Error Bias on Trust in Human-Vehicle Collaboration

System reliability promotes trust, but may also impair human monitoring performance and in turn affects trust. This effect varies across different errors. This study examined the effect of automation reliability (100%, 75%, and 50%) and its framing (negative and positive description of reliability), and error bias (false alarm and miss) on user trust and its related factors in the automated driving system (ADS). Each participant completed 16 trials with human-vehicle collaboration task in a static driving simulator. The results showed that ADS with higher reliability positively impact user trust, but negatively impact situation awareness. Users' trust was higher in false alarm (FA) events than in miss events, but task success and situation awareness were higher in miss events. This study revealed an unusual negative correlation between trust and situational awareness in human-vehicle collaboration and provided possible insights into the internal factors of error bias in automation. Our finding has implications for reliability disclosure strategies and trust calibration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries is to facilitate discovery, integration, and application of scientific knowledge about human aspects of manufacturing, and to provide a forum for worldwide dissemination of such knowledge for its application and benefit to manufacturing industries. The journal covers a broad spectrum of ergonomics and human factors issues with a focus on the design, operation and management of contemporary manufacturing systems, both in the shop floor and office environments, in the quest for manufacturing agility, i.e. enhancement and integration of human skills with hardware performance for improved market competitiveness, management of change, product and process quality, and human-system reliability. The inter- and cross-disciplinary nature of the journal allows for a wide scope of issues relevant to manufacturing system design and engineering, human resource management, social, organizational, safety, and health issues. Examples of specific subject areas of interest include: implementation of advanced manufacturing technology, human aspects of computer-aided design and engineering, work design, compensation and appraisal, selection training and education, labor-management relations, agile manufacturing and virtual companies, human factors in total quality management, prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, ergonomics of workplace, equipment and tool design, ergonomics programs, guides and standards for industry, automation safety and robot systems, human skills development and knowledge enhancing technologies, reliability, and safety and worker health issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信