{"title":"连续优化问题的集成策略布谷鸟搜索算法","authors":"Jiatang Cheng, Kaike Tu, Yan Xiong","doi":"10.1002/cpe.70116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Cuckoo search (CS) algorithm is a simple and effective optimization technique. However, CS algorithm may encounter the issue of premature convergence as the complexity of the problem increases. To address this challenge, a cuckoo search algorithm with ensemble strategy, called CSES, is presented in this paper. Specifically, three new search strategies with diverse properties are designed to boost the competitiveness. After that, according to the idea of selective ensemble, a priority roulette method is employed to select the appropriate search strategy at distinct phases of the evolution process, so as to produce more promising results. Furthermore, the effectiveness evaluation of CSES algorithm is carried out on 58 benchmark functions from CEC 2013 and CEC 2017 test suites and several real-world problems including chaotic time series prediction and transformer fault classification. Simulation outcomes illustrate that the introduced CSES is superior to five recently developed CS variants in terms of search accuracy and robustness, for example it provides 10 and 12 better performance improvements on <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>30</mn>\n <mi>D</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ 30D $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>50</mn>\n <mi>D</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ 50D $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> optimization of the CEC 2013 benchmarks, and produces 19 and 11 better performance improvements on <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>30</mn>\n <mi>D</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ 30D $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>50</mn>\n <mi>D</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ 50D $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> optimization of the CEC 2017 benchmarks, respectively. Moreover, CSES also exhibits more superiority compared to several other advanced evolutionary methods, including butterfly optimization algorithm (BOA), dung beetle optimizer (DBO), electric eel foraging optimization (EEFO), jellyfish search (JS) and wild horse optimizer (WHO), and yields 25 better performance improvements on <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>30</mn>\n <mi>D</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ 30D $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> optimization of the CEC 2013 benchmarks.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55214,"journal":{"name":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","volume":"37 12-14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cuckoo Search Algorithm With Ensemble Strategy for Continuous Optimization Problems\",\"authors\":\"Jiatang Cheng, Kaike Tu, Yan Xiong\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpe.70116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Cuckoo search (CS) algorithm is a simple and effective optimization technique. However, CS algorithm may encounter the issue of premature convergence as the complexity of the problem increases. To address this challenge, a cuckoo search algorithm with ensemble strategy, called CSES, is presented in this paper. Specifically, three new search strategies with diverse properties are designed to boost the competitiveness. After that, according to the idea of selective ensemble, a priority roulette method is employed to select the appropriate search strategy at distinct phases of the evolution process, so as to produce more promising results. Furthermore, the effectiveness evaluation of CSES algorithm is carried out on 58 benchmark functions from CEC 2013 and CEC 2017 test suites and several real-world problems including chaotic time series prediction and transformer fault classification. Simulation outcomes illustrate that the introduced CSES is superior to five recently developed CS variants in terms of search accuracy and robustness, for example it provides 10 and 12 better performance improvements on <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>30</mn>\\n <mi>D</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ 30D $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>50</mn>\\n <mi>D</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ 50D $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> optimization of the CEC 2013 benchmarks, and produces 19 and 11 better performance improvements on <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>30</mn>\\n <mi>D</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ 30D $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>50</mn>\\n <mi>D</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ 50D $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> optimization of the CEC 2017 benchmarks, respectively. Moreover, CSES also exhibits more superiority compared to several other advanced evolutionary methods, including butterfly optimization algorithm (BOA), dung beetle optimizer (DBO), electric eel foraging optimization (EEFO), jellyfish search (JS) and wild horse optimizer (WHO), and yields 25 better performance improvements on <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>30</mn>\\n <mi>D</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ 30D $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> optimization of the CEC 2013 benchmarks.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience\",\"volume\":\"37 12-14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpe.70116\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpe.70116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
布谷鸟搜索(CS)算法是一种简单有效的优化算法。然而,CS算法随着问题复杂性的增加,可能会遇到过早收敛的问题。为了解决这一挑战,本文提出了一种集成策略的布谷鸟搜索算法,称为CSES。具体而言,设计了三种不同属性的新搜索策略,以提高竞争力。然后,根据选择性集成的思想,采用优先级轮盘赌的方法,在进化过程的不同阶段选择合适的搜索策略,从而得到更有希望的结果。在CEC 2013和CEC 2017测试集的58个基准函数以及混沌时间序列预测和变压器故障分类等实际问题上,对CSES算法进行了有效性评价。仿真结果表明,所引入的CSES在搜索精度和鲁棒性方面优于最近开发的5种CS变体。例如,它在CEC 2013基准的30 D $$ 30D $$和50 D $$ 50D $$优化上提供了10和12个更好的性能改进,并在CEC 2017基准的30 D $$ 30D $$和50 D $$ 50D $$优化上分别产生19和11个更好的性能改进。此外,与蝴蝶优化算法(BOA)、屎壳虫优化算法(DBO)、电鳗觅食优化算法(EEFO)、水母搜索算法(JS)和野马优化算法(WHO)等先进的进化方法相比,CSES也显示出更多的优势,在CEC 2013基准的30 D $$ 30D $$优化上,CSES的性能提高了25倍。
Cuckoo Search Algorithm With Ensemble Strategy for Continuous Optimization Problems
Cuckoo search (CS) algorithm is a simple and effective optimization technique. However, CS algorithm may encounter the issue of premature convergence as the complexity of the problem increases. To address this challenge, a cuckoo search algorithm with ensemble strategy, called CSES, is presented in this paper. Specifically, three new search strategies with diverse properties are designed to boost the competitiveness. After that, according to the idea of selective ensemble, a priority roulette method is employed to select the appropriate search strategy at distinct phases of the evolution process, so as to produce more promising results. Furthermore, the effectiveness evaluation of CSES algorithm is carried out on 58 benchmark functions from CEC 2013 and CEC 2017 test suites and several real-world problems including chaotic time series prediction and transformer fault classification. Simulation outcomes illustrate that the introduced CSES is superior to five recently developed CS variants in terms of search accuracy and robustness, for example it provides 10 and 12 better performance improvements on and optimization of the CEC 2013 benchmarks, and produces 19 and 11 better performance improvements on and optimization of the CEC 2017 benchmarks, respectively. Moreover, CSES also exhibits more superiority compared to several other advanced evolutionary methods, including butterfly optimization algorithm (BOA), dung beetle optimizer (DBO), electric eel foraging optimization (EEFO), jellyfish search (JS) and wild horse optimizer (WHO), and yields 25 better performance improvements on optimization of the CEC 2013 benchmarks.
期刊介绍:
Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience (CCPE) publishes high-quality, original research papers, and authoritative research review papers, in the overlapping fields of:
Parallel and distributed computing;
High-performance computing;
Computational and data science;
Artificial intelligence and machine learning;
Big data applications, algorithms, and systems;
Network science;
Ontologies and semantics;
Security and privacy;
Cloud/edge/fog computing;
Green computing; and
Quantum computing.