比较学龄儿童四种跨诊断方案的系统综述

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Giorgio Ghizzoni, Maria Mirandi, Carlo Garofalo, Claudia Mazzeschi, Elisa Delvecchio
{"title":"比较学龄儿童四种跨诊断方案的系统综述","authors":"Giorgio Ghizzoni,&nbsp;Maria Mirandi,&nbsp;Carlo Garofalo,&nbsp;Claudia Mazzeschi,&nbsp;Elisa Delvecchio","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Transdiagnostic programmes are useful for helping people with internalizing symptoms and comorbid psychopathology. These programmes have as their basic idea that disorders are not separate entities but share common aetiological and maintenance processes. Their use is important with children, who tend to present less differentiated psychopathological manifestations than adults. This systematic review aimed to examine the effectiveness of four evidence-based transdiagnostic programmes: FRIENDS, Pyramid Club, Unified Protocol for Children (UP-C) and Super Skills for Life (SSL). Studies from 2018 to 2023 including children between 4 and 14 years of age were examined. Following PRISMA guidelines, 48 studies that met the inclusion criteria were considered. Most of the studies referred to treatment, only a few used the selected transdiagnostic programmes for prevention, most notably FRIENDS and SSL. Very few of the studies reviewed have been randomized controlled trials, limiting the possibility to examine incremental benefits of these programmes over alternative approaches. The findings show that all programmes showed evidence of effectiveness, but UP-C and SSL appear to be the most promising transdiagnostic programmes for the prevention and treatment of anxiety and depression in children as supported by more numerous studies in recent years. Moreover, UP-C and SSL specifically appeared effective in reducing externalizing problems and improving social skills and prosocial behaviour. Although the results presented are promising, they should be regarded as provisional and in need of further support in randomized controlled trials to test the effectiveness of these evidence-based programmes to ensure the psychological well-being of children and thus reduce healthcare costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70072","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review Comparing Four Transdiagnostic Programmes for School-Age Children\",\"authors\":\"Giorgio Ghizzoni,&nbsp;Maria Mirandi,&nbsp;Carlo Garofalo,&nbsp;Claudia Mazzeschi,&nbsp;Elisa Delvecchio\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpp.70072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Transdiagnostic programmes are useful for helping people with internalizing symptoms and comorbid psychopathology. These programmes have as their basic idea that disorders are not separate entities but share common aetiological and maintenance processes. Their use is important with children, who tend to present less differentiated psychopathological manifestations than adults. This systematic review aimed to examine the effectiveness of four evidence-based transdiagnostic programmes: FRIENDS, Pyramid Club, Unified Protocol for Children (UP-C) and Super Skills for Life (SSL). Studies from 2018 to 2023 including children between 4 and 14 years of age were examined. Following PRISMA guidelines, 48 studies that met the inclusion criteria were considered. Most of the studies referred to treatment, only a few used the selected transdiagnostic programmes for prevention, most notably FRIENDS and SSL. Very few of the studies reviewed have been randomized controlled trials, limiting the possibility to examine incremental benefits of these programmes over alternative approaches. The findings show that all programmes showed evidence of effectiveness, but UP-C and SSL appear to be the most promising transdiagnostic programmes for the prevention and treatment of anxiety and depression in children as supported by more numerous studies in recent years. Moreover, UP-C and SSL specifically appeared effective in reducing externalizing problems and improving social skills and prosocial behaviour. Although the results presented are promising, they should be regarded as provisional and in need of further support in randomized controlled trials to test the effectiveness of these evidence-based programmes to ensure the psychological well-being of children and thus reduce healthcare costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70072\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70072\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

跨诊断方案对帮助有内化症状和共病精神病理的人是有用的。这些规划的基本思想是,疾病不是独立的实体,而是具有共同的病因和维持过程。他们的使用对儿童很重要,他们倾向于表现出比成人更少分化的精神病理表现。本系统综述旨在检查四个基于证据的跨诊断项目的有效性:FRIENDS、金字塔俱乐部、儿童统一协议(UP-C)和生活超级技能(SSL)。2018年至2023年的研究包括4至14岁的儿童。按照PRISMA指南,48项符合纳入标准的研究被纳入考虑。大多数研究涉及治疗,只有少数使用选定的跨诊断方案进行预防,最著名的是FRIENDS和SSL。所审查的研究中很少有随机对照试验,这限制了检验这些方案相对于其他方法的增量效益的可能性。研究结果表明,所有方案都显示出有效性,但UP-C和SSL似乎是预防和治疗儿童焦虑和抑郁的最有希望的跨诊断方案,这得到了近年来更多研究的支持。此外,UP-C和SSL在减少外化问题、提高社会技能和亲社会行为方面表现出特别有效的效果。虽然提出的结果很有希望,但它们应该被视为暂时的,需要在随机对照试验中得到进一步的支持,以测试这些以证据为基础的方案的有效性,以确保儿童的心理健康,从而降低医疗保健成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Systematic Review Comparing Four Transdiagnostic Programmes for School-Age Children

A Systematic Review Comparing Four Transdiagnostic Programmes for School-Age Children

Transdiagnostic programmes are useful for helping people with internalizing symptoms and comorbid psychopathology. These programmes have as their basic idea that disorders are not separate entities but share common aetiological and maintenance processes. Their use is important with children, who tend to present less differentiated psychopathological manifestations than adults. This systematic review aimed to examine the effectiveness of four evidence-based transdiagnostic programmes: FRIENDS, Pyramid Club, Unified Protocol for Children (UP-C) and Super Skills for Life (SSL). Studies from 2018 to 2023 including children between 4 and 14 years of age were examined. Following PRISMA guidelines, 48 studies that met the inclusion criteria were considered. Most of the studies referred to treatment, only a few used the selected transdiagnostic programmes for prevention, most notably FRIENDS and SSL. Very few of the studies reviewed have been randomized controlled trials, limiting the possibility to examine incremental benefits of these programmes over alternative approaches. The findings show that all programmes showed evidence of effectiveness, but UP-C and SSL appear to be the most promising transdiagnostic programmes for the prevention and treatment of anxiety and depression in children as supported by more numerous studies in recent years. Moreover, UP-C and SSL specifically appeared effective in reducing externalizing problems and improving social skills and prosocial behaviour. Although the results presented are promising, they should be regarded as provisional and in need of further support in randomized controlled trials to test the effectiveness of these evidence-based programmes to ensure the psychological well-being of children and thus reduce healthcare costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信