利用各种机器学习方法从基本物理性质预测黄土宏观力学性质

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yongfeng Zhu, Wei Xiong, Wen Fan, Changshun Wu
{"title":"利用各种机器学习方法从基本物理性质预测黄土宏观力学性质","authors":"Yongfeng Zhu,&nbsp;Wei Xiong,&nbsp;Wen Fan,&nbsp;Changshun Wu","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12257-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The cohesion and internal friction angle of loess are important macro-mechanical parameters for evaluating the safety and stability of engineering construction. Traditional laboratory measurement methods are time-consuming and difficult to conduct on-site. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of five Machine Learning (ML) methods, namely Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN), BPNN optimized by Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO-BPNN) and BPNN optimized by Genetic Algorithm (GA-BPNN), in predicting the macro-mechanical properties of loess. To this end, the study collected data from 89 undisturbed loess samples and 229 remolded loess samples to construct training and testing datasets, and used three correlation analysis methods to analyze the influence of physical parameters on mechanical properties. The study found that the water content has the most significant impact on the mechanical properties of loess. In terms of prediction ability, SVM performs the best among the ML methods used, and the determination coefficient for cohesion of undisturbed loess reaches 0.857. Although the training data is limited, the prediction performance of BPNN is significantly improved after being optimized by PSO or GA. The research results show that ML provides an effective way to study the complex mechanical behavior of loess.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting macro-mechanical properties of loess from basic physical properties using various machine learning methods\",\"authors\":\"Yongfeng Zhu,&nbsp;Wei Xiong,&nbsp;Wen Fan,&nbsp;Changshun Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-025-12257-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The cohesion and internal friction angle of loess are important macro-mechanical parameters for evaluating the safety and stability of engineering construction. Traditional laboratory measurement methods are time-consuming and difficult to conduct on-site. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of five Machine Learning (ML) methods, namely Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN), BPNN optimized by Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO-BPNN) and BPNN optimized by Genetic Algorithm (GA-BPNN), in predicting the macro-mechanical properties of loess. To this end, the study collected data from 89 undisturbed loess samples and 229 remolded loess samples to construct training and testing datasets, and used three correlation analysis methods to analyze the influence of physical parameters on mechanical properties. The study found that the water content has the most significant impact on the mechanical properties of loess. In terms of prediction ability, SVM performs the best among the ML methods used, and the determination coefficient for cohesion of undisturbed loess reaches 0.857. Although the training data is limited, the prediction performance of BPNN is significantly improved after being optimized by PSO or GA. The research results show that ML provides an effective way to study the complex mechanical behavior of loess.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"84 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12257-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12257-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

黄土的黏聚力和内摩擦角是评价工程建设安全稳定的重要宏观力学参数。传统的实验室测量方法既耗时又难以在现场进行。本研究旨在比较随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)、反向传播神经网络(BPNN)、粒子群优化的BPNN (PSO-BPNN)和遗传算法优化的BPNN (GA-BPNN)五种机器学习(ML)方法在预测黄土宏观力学特性方面的有效性。为此,本研究收集了89个原状黄土样本和229个重塑黄土样本的数据,构建了训练和测试数据集,并采用三种相关分析方法分析了物理参数对力学性能的影响。研究发现,含水量对黄土力学性能的影响最为显著。在预测能力方面,SVM在ML方法中表现最好,原状黄土黏聚力的决定系数达到0.857。虽然训练数据有限,但经过粒子群算法或遗传算法优化后,bp神经网络的预测性能得到了显著提高。研究结果表明,ML为研究黄土的复杂力学行为提供了一种有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting macro-mechanical properties of loess from basic physical properties using various machine learning methods

The cohesion and internal friction angle of loess are important macro-mechanical parameters for evaluating the safety and stability of engineering construction. Traditional laboratory measurement methods are time-consuming and difficult to conduct on-site. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of five Machine Learning (ML) methods, namely Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN), BPNN optimized by Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO-BPNN) and BPNN optimized by Genetic Algorithm (GA-BPNN), in predicting the macro-mechanical properties of loess. To this end, the study collected data from 89 undisturbed loess samples and 229 remolded loess samples to construct training and testing datasets, and used three correlation analysis methods to analyze the influence of physical parameters on mechanical properties. The study found that the water content has the most significant impact on the mechanical properties of loess. In terms of prediction ability, SVM performs the best among the ML methods used, and the determination coefficient for cohesion of undisturbed loess reaches 0.857. Although the training data is limited, the prediction performance of BPNN is significantly improved after being optimized by PSO or GA. The research results show that ML provides an effective way to study the complex mechanical behavior of loess.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信