Greta Castellini , Matteo Robba , Giovanni Vedani , Milena Lambri , Fosca Vezzulli , Guendalina Graffigna , Luigi Lucini , Paola Iannello
{"title":"组学标签和消费者偏好:理解苹果购买中的审美和口味评价","authors":"Greta Castellini , Matteo Robba , Giovanni Vedani , Milena Lambri , Fosca Vezzulli , Guendalina Graffigna , Luigi Lucini , Paola Iannello","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The organic food market is rapidly expanding in both cultivated acreage and consumer demand, driven by ethical, environmental, and health considerations. However, food fraud schemes pose challenges that threaten product credibility. Omics technologies—advanced traceability methods employing genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics— may offer a potential solution for verifying the authenticity of organic products. Despite this, no studies have investigated yet how consumers perceive organic products certified through these technologies. The present study aims to fill this knowledge gap by exploring how the omics label affects consumer evaluations of taste, aesthetic and intention to buy apples. A sensory experiment involving 129 consumers assessed these attributes for a single batch of apples, which differed only in terms of the label used when presented to consumers. The labels used were ' conventional', 'organic', and 'omics certified'. Although “omics-certified” apples were generally well-received in terms of aesthetic and taste appreciation, there were no statistically significant differences between them and conventional apples. Similarly, no differences were found between omics and organic labels in terms of aesthetic and taste evaluations. However, purchase intention was significantly higher for apples labelled as omics-certified and organic compared to conventional ones. These findings suggest that labels play a critical role in influencing purchase intention, highlighting the potential of omics certifications as a credible alternative to organic labels and their ability to enhance consumer trust in food authenticity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 105574"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Omics labeling and consumer preferences: Understanding aesthetic and taste evaluations in apple purchases\",\"authors\":\"Greta Castellini , Matteo Robba , Giovanni Vedani , Milena Lambri , Fosca Vezzulli , Guendalina Graffigna , Luigi Lucini , Paola Iannello\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The organic food market is rapidly expanding in both cultivated acreage and consumer demand, driven by ethical, environmental, and health considerations. However, food fraud schemes pose challenges that threaten product credibility. Omics technologies—advanced traceability methods employing genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics— may offer a potential solution for verifying the authenticity of organic products. Despite this, no studies have investigated yet how consumers perceive organic products certified through these technologies. The present study aims to fill this knowledge gap by exploring how the omics label affects consumer evaluations of taste, aesthetic and intention to buy apples. A sensory experiment involving 129 consumers assessed these attributes for a single batch of apples, which differed only in terms of the label used when presented to consumers. The labels used were ' conventional', 'organic', and 'omics certified'. Although “omics-certified” apples were generally well-received in terms of aesthetic and taste appreciation, there were no statistically significant differences between them and conventional apples. Similarly, no differences were found between omics and organic labels in terms of aesthetic and taste evaluations. However, purchase intention was significantly higher for apples labelled as omics-certified and organic compared to conventional ones. These findings suggest that labels play a critical role in influencing purchase intention, highlighting the potential of omics certifications as a credible alternative to organic labels and their ability to enhance consumer trust in food authenticity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":\"131 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325001491\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325001491","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Omics labeling and consumer preferences: Understanding aesthetic and taste evaluations in apple purchases
The organic food market is rapidly expanding in both cultivated acreage and consumer demand, driven by ethical, environmental, and health considerations. However, food fraud schemes pose challenges that threaten product credibility. Omics technologies—advanced traceability methods employing genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics— may offer a potential solution for verifying the authenticity of organic products. Despite this, no studies have investigated yet how consumers perceive organic products certified through these technologies. The present study aims to fill this knowledge gap by exploring how the omics label affects consumer evaluations of taste, aesthetic and intention to buy apples. A sensory experiment involving 129 consumers assessed these attributes for a single batch of apples, which differed only in terms of the label used when presented to consumers. The labels used were ' conventional', 'organic', and 'omics certified'. Although “omics-certified” apples were generally well-received in terms of aesthetic and taste appreciation, there were no statistically significant differences between them and conventional apples. Similarly, no differences were found between omics and organic labels in terms of aesthetic and taste evaluations. However, purchase intention was significantly higher for apples labelled as omics-certified and organic compared to conventional ones. These findings suggest that labels play a critical role in influencing purchase intention, highlighting the potential of omics certifications as a credible alternative to organic labels and their ability to enhance consumer trust in food authenticity.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.