绿色支出乘数的效果如何?经合组织经济体的环保与非环保消费

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Syed Sadaqat Ali Shah , Kai Wu
{"title":"绿色支出乘数的效果如何?经合组织经济体的环保与非环保消费","authors":"Syed Sadaqat Ali Shah ,&nbsp;Kai Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to provide new empirical insights on estimating the effects of various green spending variables, within the multipliers context, on output growth of OECD economies. Using Jorda's (2005) local projection model, covering the period 2000–2022, we find that a one percent (or unit dollar) spending on clean energy; that is, renewable energy, and energy efficiency, indeed generates more than a percent worth of economic activity (multiplier effects) as compared to investment in non-eco-friendly industries (fossil fuels). We empirically show that green spending not only has stimulative effects on output growth, but also tends to reduce carbon emissions over the medium term. Besides positively increasing employment and reducing unemployment, we find that carbon pricing has limited effects on inflation, but it helps improve the fiscal position and tax revenue of the OECD economies. Our main policy suggestions, therefore, are to prioritize nature-based solutions and the right mix of macro-fiscal toolkit to tackle climate challenges and spur economic activity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 114676"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How effective are green spending multipliers? Eco-friendly vs non-eco-friendly spending in OECD economies\",\"authors\":\"Syed Sadaqat Ali Shah ,&nbsp;Kai Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aims to provide new empirical insights on estimating the effects of various green spending variables, within the multipliers context, on output growth of OECD economies. Using Jorda's (2005) local projection model, covering the period 2000–2022, we find that a one percent (or unit dollar) spending on clean energy; that is, renewable energy, and energy efficiency, indeed generates more than a percent worth of economic activity (multiplier effects) as compared to investment in non-eco-friendly industries (fossil fuels). We empirically show that green spending not only has stimulative effects on output growth, but also tends to reduce carbon emissions over the medium term. Besides positively increasing employment and reducing unemployment, we find that carbon pricing has limited effects on inflation, but it helps improve the fiscal position and tax revenue of the OECD economies. Our main policy suggestions, therefore, are to prioritize nature-based solutions and the right mix of macro-fiscal toolkit to tackle climate challenges and spur economic activity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"204 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114676\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525001831\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525001831","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在为在乘数背景下评估各种绿色支出变量对经合组织经济体产出增长的影响提供新的实证见解。使用Jorda(2005)的本地预测模型,涵盖2000-2022年期间,我们发现1%(或单位美元)的清洁能源支出;也就是说,与非环保产业(化石燃料)的投资相比,可再生能源和能源效率确实产生了超过1%的经济活动价值(乘数效应)。实证结果表明,绿色消费不仅对产出增长具有刺激作用,而且在中期具有减少碳排放的趋势。除了积极增加就业和降低失业率外,我们发现碳定价对通货膨胀的影响有限,但它有助于改善经合组织经济体的财政状况和税收收入。因此,我们的主要政策建议是优先考虑基于自然的解决方案,并正确组合宏观财政工具,以应对气候挑战和刺激经济活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How effective are green spending multipliers? Eco-friendly vs non-eco-friendly spending in OECD economies
This study aims to provide new empirical insights on estimating the effects of various green spending variables, within the multipliers context, on output growth of OECD economies. Using Jorda's (2005) local projection model, covering the period 2000–2022, we find that a one percent (or unit dollar) spending on clean energy; that is, renewable energy, and energy efficiency, indeed generates more than a percent worth of economic activity (multiplier effects) as compared to investment in non-eco-friendly industries (fossil fuels). We empirically show that green spending not only has stimulative effects on output growth, but also tends to reduce carbon emissions over the medium term. Besides positively increasing employment and reducing unemployment, we find that carbon pricing has limited effects on inflation, but it helps improve the fiscal position and tax revenue of the OECD economies. Our main policy suggestions, therefore, are to prioritize nature-based solutions and the right mix of macro-fiscal toolkit to tackle climate challenges and spur economic activity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信