实时门控质子治疗:介绍临床工作流程和失效模式及效果分析(FMEA)

Q1 Nursing
Wei Yang Calvin Koh , Hong Qi Tan , Kah Seng Lew , Wan Ting Alice Kor , Nur Atiqah Binte Samsuri , Jason Wei Siang Chan , Clifford Ghee Ann Chua , James Kuan Huei Lee , Andrew Wibawa , Zubin Master , Sung Yong Park
{"title":"实时门控质子治疗:介绍临床工作流程和失效模式及效果分析(FMEA)","authors":"Wei Yang Calvin Koh ,&nbsp;Hong Qi Tan ,&nbsp;Kah Seng Lew ,&nbsp;Wan Ting Alice Kor ,&nbsp;Nur Atiqah Binte Samsuri ,&nbsp;Jason Wei Siang Chan ,&nbsp;Clifford Ghee Ann Chua ,&nbsp;James Kuan Huei Lee ,&nbsp;Andrew Wibawa ,&nbsp;Zubin Master ,&nbsp;Sung Yong Park","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2025.100311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Real-Time Gated Proton Therapy (RGPT) has been used in proton therapy to mitigate respiratory motion challenges. This study presents the first comprehensive description of the RGPT clinical workflow at the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS) and introduces a novel Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for RGPT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We detail the workflow for prostate and liver/lung proton treatments. The FMEA, following AAPM TG-100 guidelines, evaluated potential failure modes based on occurrence, detectability, and severity. This comprehensive risk assessment approach allows for the establishment of robust Quality Assurance (QA) protocols, enhancing treatment safety and efficacy. The FMEA was performed by two disciplinary groups, namely the medical physicists and radiation therapists. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is used as the metric to assess the consistency of ratings among participants.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Since implementation, 15 patients (13 prostate, 2 liver) have been treated with RGPT. The study identified 96 potential failure modes, with 47 evaluated by two disciplines. Inter-rater concordance analysis revealed strong agreement within one group, while combined groups showed lower consistency, highlighting potential differences in risk perception between disciplines. Notably, severity ratings demonstrated better correlations among raters compared to other categories, suggesting a shared understanding of the potential impact of failures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study provides valuable insights for institutions implementing RGPT, potentially enhancing treatment workflow, patient safety, and QA procedures. The detailed workflow description and FMEA results offer a foundation for standardizing RGPT practices and prioritizing risk mitigation strategies. Future research should focus on multi-institutional collaborations to further refine RGPT protocols and risk assessments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-time gated proton therapy: Introducing clinical workflow and failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)\",\"authors\":\"Wei Yang Calvin Koh ,&nbsp;Hong Qi Tan ,&nbsp;Kah Seng Lew ,&nbsp;Wan Ting Alice Kor ,&nbsp;Nur Atiqah Binte Samsuri ,&nbsp;Jason Wei Siang Chan ,&nbsp;Clifford Ghee Ann Chua ,&nbsp;James Kuan Huei Lee ,&nbsp;Andrew Wibawa ,&nbsp;Zubin Master ,&nbsp;Sung Yong Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tipsro.2025.100311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Real-Time Gated Proton Therapy (RGPT) has been used in proton therapy to mitigate respiratory motion challenges. This study presents the first comprehensive description of the RGPT clinical workflow at the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS) and introduces a novel Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for RGPT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We detail the workflow for prostate and liver/lung proton treatments. The FMEA, following AAPM TG-100 guidelines, evaluated potential failure modes based on occurrence, detectability, and severity. This comprehensive risk assessment approach allows for the establishment of robust Quality Assurance (QA) protocols, enhancing treatment safety and efficacy. The FMEA was performed by two disciplinary groups, namely the medical physicists and radiation therapists. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is used as the metric to assess the consistency of ratings among participants.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Since implementation, 15 patients (13 prostate, 2 liver) have been treated with RGPT. The study identified 96 potential failure modes, with 47 evaluated by two disciplines. Inter-rater concordance analysis revealed strong agreement within one group, while combined groups showed lower consistency, highlighting potential differences in risk perception between disciplines. Notably, severity ratings demonstrated better correlations among raters compared to other categories, suggesting a shared understanding of the potential impact of failures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study provides valuable insights for institutions implementing RGPT, potentially enhancing treatment workflow, patient safety, and QA procedures. The detailed workflow description and FMEA results offer a foundation for standardizing RGPT practices and prioritizing risk mitigation strategies. Future research should focus on multi-institutional collaborations to further refine RGPT protocols and risk assessments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632425000125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632425000125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实时门控质子治疗(RGPT)已被用于质子治疗,以减轻呼吸运动的挑战。本研究首次全面描述了新加坡国家癌症中心(NCCS)的RGPT临床工作流程,并介绍了RGPT的新型失效模式和效果分析(FMEA)。方法详细介绍前列腺和肝/肺质子治疗的工作流程。FMEA遵循AAPM TG-100指南,根据发生、可检测性和严重性评估潜在的故障模式。这种全面的风险评估方法允许建立健全的质量保证(QA)方案,提高治疗的安全性和有效性。FMEA由两个学科组进行,即医学物理学家和放射治疗师。用类内相关系数(Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC)作为衡量参与者评分一致性的指标。结果15例患者(前列腺13例,肝脏2例)接受了RGPT治疗。该研究确定了96种潜在的失效模式,其中47种由两个学科评估。评级间的一致性分析显示,一组内部的一致性很强,而组合组的一致性较低,突出了学科之间风险感知的潜在差异。值得注意的是,与其他类别相比,严重性评级显示了评级者之间更好的相关性,这表明对失败的潜在影响有共同的理解。结论本研究为实施RGPT的机构提供了有价值的见解,可能会改善治疗工作流程,患者安全和质量保证程序。详细的工作流程描述和FMEA结果为标准化RGPT实践和确定风险缓解策略的优先级提供了基础。未来的研究应侧重于多机构合作,以进一步完善RGPT协议和风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-time gated proton therapy: Introducing clinical workflow and failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)

Introduction

Real-Time Gated Proton Therapy (RGPT) has been used in proton therapy to mitigate respiratory motion challenges. This study presents the first comprehensive description of the RGPT clinical workflow at the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS) and introduces a novel Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for RGPT.

Methods

We detail the workflow for prostate and liver/lung proton treatments. The FMEA, following AAPM TG-100 guidelines, evaluated potential failure modes based on occurrence, detectability, and severity. This comprehensive risk assessment approach allows for the establishment of robust Quality Assurance (QA) protocols, enhancing treatment safety and efficacy. The FMEA was performed by two disciplinary groups, namely the medical physicists and radiation therapists. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is used as the metric to assess the consistency of ratings among participants.

Results

Since implementation, 15 patients (13 prostate, 2 liver) have been treated with RGPT. The study identified 96 potential failure modes, with 47 evaluated by two disciplines. Inter-rater concordance analysis revealed strong agreement within one group, while combined groups showed lower consistency, highlighting potential differences in risk perception between disciplines. Notably, severity ratings demonstrated better correlations among raters compared to other categories, suggesting a shared understanding of the potential impact of failures.

Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights for institutions implementing RGPT, potentially enhancing treatment workflow, patient safety, and QA procedures. The detailed workflow description and FMEA results offer a foundation for standardizing RGPT practices and prioritizing risk mitigation strategies. Future research should focus on multi-institutional collaborations to further refine RGPT protocols and risk assessments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信