基于单元数值分析的砂石循环响应本构模型标定与评价

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Bofei Xu, Adda Athanasopoulos-Zekkos
{"title":"基于单元数值分析的砂石循环响应本构模型标定与评价","authors":"Bofei Xu,&nbsp;Adda Athanasopoulos-Zekkos","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper focused on the sand-based excess pore pressure generating constitutive models, PM4Sand, UBCSand, and URS/Roth we selected to model liquefiable gravel, as a critical component to our study on the effects of gravelly soil liquefaction on the performance of CentrePort, under the 2016 <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>M</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>w</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>7.8 Earthquake in Kaikōura, New Zealand. Upon review of the model documentations, we highlighted and compared their formulations with emphases in the key aspects of soil dynamic response. The models were calibrated to match project specific gravel-based laboratory Cyclic Resistance Ratio (CRR) curves. We also performed extensive single element analyses to examine critical aspects of the soil’s seismic response, including modulus reduction and damping, effects on liquefaction triggering from overburden stresses, and static shear bias. The analytical results are compared to well established sand-based relationships, as well as more recently published gravel-based results. Based on the findings, recommendations were made for future researcher and practitioners working on numerical forward and back analysis dealing with potentially liquefiable gravelly soils.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 109461"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calibration and assessment of sand-based constitutive models for gravel cyclic response via numerical single element analyses\",\"authors\":\"Bofei Xu,&nbsp;Adda Athanasopoulos-Zekkos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper focused on the sand-based excess pore pressure generating constitutive models, PM4Sand, UBCSand, and URS/Roth we selected to model liquefiable gravel, as a critical component to our study on the effects of gravelly soil liquefaction on the performance of CentrePort, under the 2016 <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>M</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>w</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>7.8 Earthquake in Kaikōura, New Zealand. Upon review of the model documentations, we highlighted and compared their formulations with emphases in the key aspects of soil dynamic response. The models were calibrated to match project specific gravel-based laboratory Cyclic Resistance Ratio (CRR) curves. We also performed extensive single element analyses to examine critical aspects of the soil’s seismic response, including modulus reduction and damping, effects on liquefaction triggering from overburden stresses, and static shear bias. The analytical results are compared to well established sand-based relationships, as well as more recently published gravel-based results. Based on the findings, recommendations were made for future researcher and practitioners working on numerical forward and back analysis dealing with potentially liquefiable gravelly soils.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"196 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109461\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125002544\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125002544","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文重点研究了基于砂土的超孔隙压力产生本构模型PM4Sand、UBCSand和URS/Roth,我们选择了它们来模拟可液化砾石,作为我们研究2016年新西兰Kaikōura Mw7.8地震下砂土液化对CentrePort性能影响的关键组成部分。在回顾模型文献后,我们强调并比较了他们的公式,重点是土壤动力响应的关键方面。对模型进行了校准,以匹配项目特定的砾石基实验室循环阻力比(CRR)曲线。我们还进行了广泛的单元素分析,以检查土壤地震反应的关键方面,包括模量减少和阻尼,覆盖层应力对液化触发的影响,以及静态剪切偏倚。将分析结果与已建立的砂基关系以及最近发表的砾石基结果进行比较。基于这些发现,对未来的研究人员和实践者提出了建议,这些研究人员和实践者从事处理潜在可液化砾石土壤的数值正反分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Calibration and assessment of sand-based constitutive models for gravel cyclic response via numerical single element analyses

Calibration and assessment of sand-based constitutive models for gravel cyclic response via numerical single element analyses
This paper focused on the sand-based excess pore pressure generating constitutive models, PM4Sand, UBCSand, and URS/Roth we selected to model liquefiable gravel, as a critical component to our study on the effects of gravelly soil liquefaction on the performance of CentrePort, under the 2016 Mw7.8 Earthquake in Kaikōura, New Zealand. Upon review of the model documentations, we highlighted and compared their formulations with emphases in the key aspects of soil dynamic response. The models were calibrated to match project specific gravel-based laboratory Cyclic Resistance Ratio (CRR) curves. We also performed extensive single element analyses to examine critical aspects of the soil’s seismic response, including modulus reduction and damping, effects on liquefaction triggering from overburden stresses, and static shear bias. The analytical results are compared to well established sand-based relationships, as well as more recently published gravel-based results. Based on the findings, recommendations were made for future researcher and practitioners working on numerical forward and back analysis dealing with potentially liquefiable gravelly soils.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信