{"title":"基于动态QCA和LightGBM-SHAP算法的双方法研究中国水资源绿色效率的配置路径和关键驱动因素","authors":"Naiming He, Rijia Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Water resource utilization is crucial for sustainable development, and enhancing water resource green efficiency (WRGE) is essential for addressing water scarcity. This study presents three key innovations: (1) It applies the super-efficiency epsilon-based measurement and global Malmquist–Luenberger index (Super-EBM-GML) model from the perspective of high-quality economic development to analyze the spatiotemporal characteristics of WRGE across 30 Chinese provinces from 2014 to 2022. (2) It uses the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework and dynamic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) model to identify the key drivers of WRGE and regional variations. (3) It integrates machine learning (light gradient-boosting machine with Shapley additive explanations; LightGBM-SHAP) with QCA to quantify the impact of variables, combining qualitative and quantitative analysis. Key findings include the following: (1) WRGE showed an upward trend, with higher efficiency in the eastern and economically developed regions. Growth in the GML index was mainly driven by green technological progress (GTC). (2) Although no single necessary condition was found to drive WRGE, three model types and four configuration paths were identified: technology–environment-driven, environment-driven, and organization–environment-driven. (3) The most influential factors were digital economy development, followed by industrial structure rationalization and environmental regulation. This study provides key policy recommendations, including the promotion of green technology, the strengthening of regulations, the enhancement of policy resilience, the implementation of region-specific strategies, and the integration of the digital economy with water resource management, thus offering valuable insights for regions facing water scarcity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 113540"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A dual-method approach integrating dynamic QCA and LightGBM-SHAP algorithms to uncover the configuration paths and key drivers of water resource green efficiency in China\",\"authors\":\"Naiming He, Rijia Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Water resource utilization is crucial for sustainable development, and enhancing water resource green efficiency (WRGE) is essential for addressing water scarcity. This study presents three key innovations: (1) It applies the super-efficiency epsilon-based measurement and global Malmquist–Luenberger index (Super-EBM-GML) model from the perspective of high-quality economic development to analyze the spatiotemporal characteristics of WRGE across 30 Chinese provinces from 2014 to 2022. (2) It uses the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework and dynamic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) model to identify the key drivers of WRGE and regional variations. (3) It integrates machine learning (light gradient-boosting machine with Shapley additive explanations; LightGBM-SHAP) with QCA to quantify the impact of variables, combining qualitative and quantitative analysis. Key findings include the following: (1) WRGE showed an upward trend, with higher efficiency in the eastern and economically developed regions. Growth in the GML index was mainly driven by green technological progress (GTC). (2) Although no single necessary condition was found to drive WRGE, three model types and four configuration paths were identified: technology–environment-driven, environment-driven, and organization–environment-driven. (3) The most influential factors were digital economy development, followed by industrial structure rationalization and environmental regulation. This study provides key policy recommendations, including the promotion of green technology, the strengthening of regulations, the enhancement of policy resilience, the implementation of region-specific strategies, and the integration of the digital economy with water resource management, thus offering valuable insights for regions facing water scarcity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"175 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004704\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A dual-method approach integrating dynamic QCA and LightGBM-SHAP algorithms to uncover the configuration paths and key drivers of water resource green efficiency in China
Water resource utilization is crucial for sustainable development, and enhancing water resource green efficiency (WRGE) is essential for addressing water scarcity. This study presents three key innovations: (1) It applies the super-efficiency epsilon-based measurement and global Malmquist–Luenberger index (Super-EBM-GML) model from the perspective of high-quality economic development to analyze the spatiotemporal characteristics of WRGE across 30 Chinese provinces from 2014 to 2022. (2) It uses the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework and dynamic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) model to identify the key drivers of WRGE and regional variations. (3) It integrates machine learning (light gradient-boosting machine with Shapley additive explanations; LightGBM-SHAP) with QCA to quantify the impact of variables, combining qualitative and quantitative analysis. Key findings include the following: (1) WRGE showed an upward trend, with higher efficiency in the eastern and economically developed regions. Growth in the GML index was mainly driven by green technological progress (GTC). (2) Although no single necessary condition was found to drive WRGE, three model types and four configuration paths were identified: technology–environment-driven, environment-driven, and organization–environment-driven. (3) The most influential factors were digital economy development, followed by industrial structure rationalization and environmental regulation. This study provides key policy recommendations, including the promotion of green technology, the strengthening of regulations, the enhancement of policy resilience, the implementation of region-specific strategies, and the integration of the digital economy with water resource management, thus offering valuable insights for regions facing water scarcity.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.