终末期萎缩性年龄相关性黄斑变性的发病作为终点——德尔菲研究:萎缩性会议的分类

IF 3.2 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Zhichao Wu BAppSc(Optom), PhD , Srinivas R. Sadda MD , Thomas Ach MD , Barbara A. Blodi MD , Ferdinando Bottoni MD , Usha Chakravarthy MD, PhD , Emily Y. Chew MD , Christine A. Curcio PhD , Frederick L. Ferris III MD , Monika Fleckenstein MD , K. Bailey Freund MD , Juan E. Grunwald MD , Frank G. Holz MD , Glenn J. Jaffe MD , Sandra Liakopoulos MD , Tock Han Lim FRCSEd , Jordi M. Monés MD, PhD , Sergio Pagliarini MD, FRCOphth , Daniel Pauleikhoff MD , Maximilian Pfau MD , Robyn H. Guymer MBBS, PhD
{"title":"终末期萎缩性年龄相关性黄斑变性的发病作为终点——德尔菲研究:萎缩性会议的分类","authors":"Zhichao Wu BAppSc(Optom), PhD ,&nbsp;Srinivas R. Sadda MD ,&nbsp;Thomas Ach MD ,&nbsp;Barbara A. Blodi MD ,&nbsp;Ferdinando Bottoni MD ,&nbsp;Usha Chakravarthy MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Emily Y. Chew MD ,&nbsp;Christine A. Curcio PhD ,&nbsp;Frederick L. Ferris III MD ,&nbsp;Monika Fleckenstein MD ,&nbsp;K. Bailey Freund MD ,&nbsp;Juan E. Grunwald MD ,&nbsp;Frank G. Holz MD ,&nbsp;Glenn J. Jaffe MD ,&nbsp;Sandra Liakopoulos MD ,&nbsp;Tock Han Lim FRCSEd ,&nbsp;Jordi M. Monés MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sergio Pagliarini MD, FRCOphth ,&nbsp;Daniel Pauleikhoff MD ,&nbsp;Maximilian Pfau MD ,&nbsp;Robyn H. Guymer MBBS, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xops.2025.100777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate whether consensus can be reached on the acceptability of end-stage atrophy onset as a clinical end point in early intervention trials of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and the criteria for defining such an end point.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A modified Delphi study.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>International panel of experts in AMD, retinal imaging, and histopathology that are part of the Classification of Atrophy Meetings group.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A modified Delphi study was undertaken to determine if there is consensus on the acceptability of the onset of end-stage atrophic AMD as a clinical end point to evaluate early interventions and the criteria for defining such an end point. Two initial rounds of online surveys were conducted. Aggregate results and anonymized comments were provided after each round, followed by a face-to-face meeting before a final survey round was completed.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Statements where consensus was reached, defined as ≥80% of responses within the 3-point bracket for agreement or disagreement based on a 9-point Likert rating scale, from a total of 33 statements included in the final round of the survey.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Consensus was reached for the statement that the onset of end-stage atrophic AMD was an appropriate clinical end point to evaluate early interventions (82% responses in agreement). Consensus was also reached for the statement that such an end point should be defined based on anatomical changes that have been previously shown in clinical studies to be associated with marked, but not necessarily complete, functional loss (95% responses in agreement). Consensus was nearly reached for the specific criterion that ≥90% of such atrophic AMD lesions should have ≥1 test location that was ≤10 decibels on 2 microperimetry tests (77% responses in agreement).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There was expert group consensus that the onset of end-stage atrophy is an appropriate clinical end point to evaluate early interventions in AMD, and that such an end point should show evidence of marked functional loss in prior clinical studies. We believe these findings will help to define incident clinical end points that are acceptable to regulatory authorities.</div></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><div>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74363,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology science","volume":"5 5","pages":"Article 100777"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Onset of End-Stage Atrophic Age-Related Macular Degeneration as an End Point—A Delphi Study: Classification of Atrophy Meetings Report 7\",\"authors\":\"Zhichao Wu BAppSc(Optom), PhD ,&nbsp;Srinivas R. Sadda MD ,&nbsp;Thomas Ach MD ,&nbsp;Barbara A. Blodi MD ,&nbsp;Ferdinando Bottoni MD ,&nbsp;Usha Chakravarthy MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Emily Y. Chew MD ,&nbsp;Christine A. Curcio PhD ,&nbsp;Frederick L. Ferris III MD ,&nbsp;Monika Fleckenstein MD ,&nbsp;K. Bailey Freund MD ,&nbsp;Juan E. Grunwald MD ,&nbsp;Frank G. Holz MD ,&nbsp;Glenn J. Jaffe MD ,&nbsp;Sandra Liakopoulos MD ,&nbsp;Tock Han Lim FRCSEd ,&nbsp;Jordi M. Monés MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sergio Pagliarini MD, FRCOphth ,&nbsp;Daniel Pauleikhoff MD ,&nbsp;Maximilian Pfau MD ,&nbsp;Robyn H. Guymer MBBS, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xops.2025.100777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate whether consensus can be reached on the acceptability of end-stage atrophy onset as a clinical end point in early intervention trials of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and the criteria for defining such an end point.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A modified Delphi study.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>International panel of experts in AMD, retinal imaging, and histopathology that are part of the Classification of Atrophy Meetings group.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A modified Delphi study was undertaken to determine if there is consensus on the acceptability of the onset of end-stage atrophic AMD as a clinical end point to evaluate early interventions and the criteria for defining such an end point. Two initial rounds of online surveys were conducted. Aggregate results and anonymized comments were provided after each round, followed by a face-to-face meeting before a final survey round was completed.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Statements where consensus was reached, defined as ≥80% of responses within the 3-point bracket for agreement or disagreement based on a 9-point Likert rating scale, from a total of 33 statements included in the final round of the survey.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Consensus was reached for the statement that the onset of end-stage atrophic AMD was an appropriate clinical end point to evaluate early interventions (82% responses in agreement). Consensus was also reached for the statement that such an end point should be defined based on anatomical changes that have been previously shown in clinical studies to be associated with marked, but not necessarily complete, functional loss (95% responses in agreement). Consensus was nearly reached for the specific criterion that ≥90% of such atrophic AMD lesions should have ≥1 test location that was ≤10 decibels on 2 microperimetry tests (77% responses in agreement).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There was expert group consensus that the onset of end-stage atrophy is an appropriate clinical end point to evaluate early interventions in AMD, and that such an end point should show evidence of marked functional loss in prior clinical studies. We believe these findings will help to define incident clinical end points that are acceptable to regulatory authorities.</div></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><div>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology science\",\"volume\":\"5 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 100777\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914525000752\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914525000752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨在年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)的早期干预试验中,终末期萎缩发病作为临床终点是否可以达成共识,以及确定这一终点的标准。DesignA修正Delphi研究。参与者AMD,视网膜成像和组织病理学的国际专家小组,是萎缩分类会议组的一部分。方法采用一项修正的德尔菲研究,以确定是否有共识的终末期萎缩性AMD发病作为临床终点,以评估早期干预措施和定义这一终点的标准。最初进行了两轮在线调查。在每一轮调查结束后,都会提供汇总结果和匿名评论,然后在最后一轮调查结束前进行面对面的会议。主要结果测量达成共识的陈述,定义为根据9分李克特量表,在最后一轮调查中包括的33个陈述中,同意或不同意的回答在3分范围内≥80%。研究人员一致认为,终末期萎缩性AMD的发病是评估早期干预措施的合适临床终点(82%的应答一致)。对于这样一个终点的定义也达成了共识,即应该基于先前在临床研究中显示的与明显但不一定完全的功能丧失相关的解剖变化(95%的应答一致)。对于≥90%的此类萎缩性AMD病变应具有≥1个在2次显微镜检查中≤10分贝的检测位置的具体标准,几乎达成了共识(77%的反应一致)。专家组一致认为,终末期萎缩的发病是评估AMD早期干预措施的一个合适的临床终点,而且这个终点应该在先前的临床研究中显示出明显的功能丧失的证据。我们相信这些发现将有助于确定监管当局可接受的事件临床终点。财务披露专有或商业披露可在本文末尾的脚注和披露中找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Onset of End-Stage Atrophic Age-Related Macular Degeneration as an End Point—A Delphi Study: Classification of Atrophy Meetings Report 7

Purpose

To investigate whether consensus can be reached on the acceptability of end-stage atrophy onset as a clinical end point in early intervention trials of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and the criteria for defining such an end point.

Design

A modified Delphi study.

Participants

International panel of experts in AMD, retinal imaging, and histopathology that are part of the Classification of Atrophy Meetings group.

Methods

A modified Delphi study was undertaken to determine if there is consensus on the acceptability of the onset of end-stage atrophic AMD as a clinical end point to evaluate early interventions and the criteria for defining such an end point. Two initial rounds of online surveys were conducted. Aggregate results and anonymized comments were provided after each round, followed by a face-to-face meeting before a final survey round was completed.

Main Outcome Measures

Statements where consensus was reached, defined as ≥80% of responses within the 3-point bracket for agreement or disagreement based on a 9-point Likert rating scale, from a total of 33 statements included in the final round of the survey.

Results

Consensus was reached for the statement that the onset of end-stage atrophic AMD was an appropriate clinical end point to evaluate early interventions (82% responses in agreement). Consensus was also reached for the statement that such an end point should be defined based on anatomical changes that have been previously shown in clinical studies to be associated with marked, but not necessarily complete, functional loss (95% responses in agreement). Consensus was nearly reached for the specific criterion that ≥90% of such atrophic AMD lesions should have ≥1 test location that was ≤10 decibels on 2 microperimetry tests (77% responses in agreement).

Conclusions

There was expert group consensus that the onset of end-stage atrophy is an appropriate clinical end point to evaluate early interventions in AMD, and that such an end point should show evidence of marked functional loss in prior clinical studies. We believe these findings will help to define incident clinical end points that are acceptable to regulatory authorities.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology science
Ophthalmology science Ophthalmology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
89 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信