Katharina I. Salo , Lisanne S. Pauw , Ricarda I. Schubotz , Anne Milek
{"title":"夫妻冲突的核心:情绪调节和心脏反应","authors":"Katharina I. Salo , Lisanne S. Pauw , Ricarda I. Schubotz , Anne Milek","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2025.112581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adaptive emotion regulation can buffer against cardiac reactivity under acute stress. However, research on the effectiveness of emotion regulation in the face of interpersonal stress is scarce. We therefore conducted an experiment investigating whether emotion regulation might buffer against parasympathetically mediated cardiac reactivity during conflict. Couples engaged in a 10-min conflict discussion (N = 253 participants included in the final analyses). Prior to the discussion, one partner per couple was randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions (acceptance, cognitive reappraisal, control group). In both emotion regulation groups, the manipulated partner was instructed to apply either acceptance or cognitive reappraisal during the following conflict. Vagal (i.e., parasympathetic) activity as indexed by the heart rate variability (HRV) parameter RMSSD was assessed at baseline and during conflict. Cardiac reactivity was operationalized as the difference between baseline vagal activity and vagal activity during conflict. Both emotion regulation strategies significantly reduced cardiac reactivity in the manipulated partner as compared to the control group. We thus found preliminary support that emotion regulation may beneficially alter parasympathetically mediated cardiac reactivity during acute interpersonal stress.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54945,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 112581"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"At the heart of couple conflict: Emotion regulation and cardiac reactivity\",\"authors\":\"Katharina I. Salo , Lisanne S. Pauw , Ricarda I. Schubotz , Anne Milek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2025.112581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Adaptive emotion regulation can buffer against cardiac reactivity under acute stress. However, research on the effectiveness of emotion regulation in the face of interpersonal stress is scarce. We therefore conducted an experiment investigating whether emotion regulation might buffer against parasympathetically mediated cardiac reactivity during conflict. Couples engaged in a 10-min conflict discussion (N = 253 participants included in the final analyses). Prior to the discussion, one partner per couple was randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions (acceptance, cognitive reappraisal, control group). In both emotion regulation groups, the manipulated partner was instructed to apply either acceptance or cognitive reappraisal during the following conflict. Vagal (i.e., parasympathetic) activity as indexed by the heart rate variability (HRV) parameter RMSSD was assessed at baseline and during conflict. Cardiac reactivity was operationalized as the difference between baseline vagal activity and vagal activity during conflict. Both emotion regulation strategies significantly reduced cardiac reactivity in the manipulated partner as compared to the control group. We thus found preliminary support that emotion regulation may beneficially alter parasympathetically mediated cardiac reactivity during acute interpersonal stress.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Psychophysiology\",\"volume\":\"212 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Psychophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876025000777\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876025000777","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
At the heart of couple conflict: Emotion regulation and cardiac reactivity
Adaptive emotion regulation can buffer against cardiac reactivity under acute stress. However, research on the effectiveness of emotion regulation in the face of interpersonal stress is scarce. We therefore conducted an experiment investigating whether emotion regulation might buffer against parasympathetically mediated cardiac reactivity during conflict. Couples engaged in a 10-min conflict discussion (N = 253 participants included in the final analyses). Prior to the discussion, one partner per couple was randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions (acceptance, cognitive reappraisal, control group). In both emotion regulation groups, the manipulated partner was instructed to apply either acceptance or cognitive reappraisal during the following conflict. Vagal (i.e., parasympathetic) activity as indexed by the heart rate variability (HRV) parameter RMSSD was assessed at baseline and during conflict. Cardiac reactivity was operationalized as the difference between baseline vagal activity and vagal activity during conflict. Both emotion regulation strategies significantly reduced cardiac reactivity in the manipulated partner as compared to the control group. We thus found preliminary support that emotion regulation may beneficially alter parasympathetically mediated cardiac reactivity during acute interpersonal stress.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Psychophysiology is the official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, and provides a respected forum for the publication of high quality original contributions on all aspects of psychophysiology. The journal is interdisciplinary and aims to integrate the neurosciences and behavioral sciences. Empirical, theoretical, and review articles are encouraged in the following areas:
• Cerebral psychophysiology: including functional brain mapping and neuroimaging with Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Electroencephalographic studies.
• Autonomic functions: including bilateral electrodermal activity, pupillometry and blood volume changes.
• Cardiovascular Psychophysiology:including studies of blood pressure, cardiac functioning and respiration.
• Somatic psychophysiology: including muscle activity, eye movements and eye blinks.