工业应用生物质热电联产超临界CO2循环优化

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Francesco Ceccanti, Alessio Ciambellotti, Andrea Baccioli, Lorenzo Ferrari, Umberto Desideri
{"title":"工业应用生物质热电联产超临界CO2循环优化","authors":"Francesco Ceccanti,&nbsp;Alessio Ciambellotti,&nbsp;Andrea Baccioli,&nbsp;Lorenzo Ferrari,&nbsp;Umberto Desideri","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The industrial sector emitted 9.0 gigatonnes of CO<sub>2</sub> in 2022, representing 25 % of global emissions, highlighting the urgent need for decarbonisation strategies. Biomass-fuelled Combined Heat and Power (CHP) systems offer a promising pathway to reduce primary energy demand and industrial emissions. This study evaluates three supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> (sCO<sub>2</sub>)-based cogeneration architectures compared to standard biomass-fuelled Rankine cycles to assess their potential for enhanced energy and economic performance. The systems were designed to serve an industrial load of 10 ton/hour of 16-bar steam and 8 MW of electricity, typical of a tissue paper mill. Key parameters, including electrical efficiency, primary energy savings (PES), capital expenditures (CAPEX), and levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), were optimized and analyzed. Results demonstrate that at a turbine inlet pressure of 300 bar, sCO<sub>2</sub> cycles achieve a PES of up to 13.8 %, significantly outperforming the Rankine cycle (1.9 %). CAPEX for sCO<sub>2</sub> systems ranges from €32 million to €40 million, comparable to or lower than Rankine cycles of similar size. Biomass consumption is reduced by 3,500–4,000 tons annually, as reflected in LCOE values of €0.086–€0.095 per kWh<sub>el</sub>. These findings suggest that sCO<sub>2</sub> cycles are a viable and efficient alternative for biomass-based CHP systems, particularly in biomass-scarce scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"335 ","pages":"Article 119826"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of supercritical CO2 cycles for biomass cogeneration for industrial applications\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Ceccanti,&nbsp;Alessio Ciambellotti,&nbsp;Andrea Baccioli,&nbsp;Lorenzo Ferrari,&nbsp;Umberto Desideri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The industrial sector emitted 9.0 gigatonnes of CO<sub>2</sub> in 2022, representing 25 % of global emissions, highlighting the urgent need for decarbonisation strategies. Biomass-fuelled Combined Heat and Power (CHP) systems offer a promising pathway to reduce primary energy demand and industrial emissions. This study evaluates three supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> (sCO<sub>2</sub>)-based cogeneration architectures compared to standard biomass-fuelled Rankine cycles to assess their potential for enhanced energy and economic performance. The systems were designed to serve an industrial load of 10 ton/hour of 16-bar steam and 8 MW of electricity, typical of a tissue paper mill. Key parameters, including electrical efficiency, primary energy savings (PES), capital expenditures (CAPEX), and levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), were optimized and analyzed. Results demonstrate that at a turbine inlet pressure of 300 bar, sCO<sub>2</sub> cycles achieve a PES of up to 13.8 %, significantly outperforming the Rankine cycle (1.9 %). CAPEX for sCO<sub>2</sub> systems ranges from €32 million to €40 million, comparable to or lower than Rankine cycles of similar size. Biomass consumption is reduced by 3,500–4,000 tons annually, as reflected in LCOE values of €0.086–€0.095 per kWh<sub>el</sub>. These findings suggest that sCO<sub>2</sub> cycles are a viable and efficient alternative for biomass-based CHP systems, particularly in biomass-scarce scenarios.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"volume\":\"335 \",\"pages\":\"Article 119826\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425003498\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425003498","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022年,工业部门排放了90亿吨二氧化碳,占全球排放量的25%,凸显了对脱碳战略的迫切需求。生物质燃料热电联产(CHP)系统为减少一次能源需求和工业排放提供了一条有希望的途径。本研究评估了三种基于超临界二氧化碳(sCO2)的热电联产架构,并与标准生物质燃料朗肯循环进行了比较,以评估它们在提高能源和经济性能方面的潜力。这些系统的设计目的是为16巴蒸汽和8兆瓦电力的10吨/小时的工业负荷提供服务,这是一个典型的薄纸厂。关键参数,包括电力效率、一次能源节约(PES)、资本支出(CAPEX)和电力平准化成本(LCOE),进行了优化和分析。结果表明,在涡轮进口压力为300 bar时,sCO2循环的PES高达13.8%,显著优于朗肯循环(1.9%)。sCO2系统的资本支出从3200万欧元到4000万欧元不等,与类似规模的Rankine循环相当或更低。生物质消耗每年减少3500 - 4000吨,每千瓦时LCOE值为0.086 - 0.095欧元。这些发现表明,对于基于生物质的热电联产系统来说,sCO2循环是一种可行且有效的替代方案,特别是在生物质稀缺的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimization of supercritical CO2 cycles for biomass cogeneration for industrial applications
The industrial sector emitted 9.0 gigatonnes of CO2 in 2022, representing 25 % of global emissions, highlighting the urgent need for decarbonisation strategies. Biomass-fuelled Combined Heat and Power (CHP) systems offer a promising pathway to reduce primary energy demand and industrial emissions. This study evaluates three supercritical CO2 (sCO2)-based cogeneration architectures compared to standard biomass-fuelled Rankine cycles to assess their potential for enhanced energy and economic performance. The systems were designed to serve an industrial load of 10 ton/hour of 16-bar steam and 8 MW of electricity, typical of a tissue paper mill. Key parameters, including electrical efficiency, primary energy savings (PES), capital expenditures (CAPEX), and levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), were optimized and analyzed. Results demonstrate that at a turbine inlet pressure of 300 bar, sCO2 cycles achieve a PES of up to 13.8 %, significantly outperforming the Rankine cycle (1.9 %). CAPEX for sCO2 systems ranges from €32 million to €40 million, comparable to or lower than Rankine cycles of similar size. Biomass consumption is reduced by 3,500–4,000 tons annually, as reflected in LCOE values of €0.086–€0.095 per kWhel. These findings suggest that sCO2 cycles are a viable and efficient alternative for biomass-based CHP systems, particularly in biomass-scarce scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信