Rikke C. Pedersen , Ebbe H. Jensen , Isaac A. Løge , Brian Elmegaard , Jonas K. Jensen
{"title":"捕获的二氧化碳中杂质对液化和净化成本分配的影响","authors":"Rikke C. Pedersen , Ebbe H. Jensen , Isaac A. Løge , Brian Elmegaard , Jonas K. Jensen","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage is an unavoidable tool in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from energy and industrial sectors. Shared transport infrastructures are necessary to implement the technology on large-scale at acceptable costs. The CO<sub>2</sub> quality varies with different emitters, and if these should use a common infrastructure, it is important to understand the economic effects of the impurities throughout the Carbon Capture value chain. The captured CO<sub>2</sub> is typically purified and liquefied using a conditioning system prior to transportation. This study performs an exergoeconomic analysis of a conditioning process considering four different feed gas compositions. The system was modelled using a chemical process modelling tool, and energy and economic analyses were performed. Exergy was used as a basis for distributing the costs associated with reaching the liquid state and the correct quality, respectively. It was found, that the various feed gas compositions did not significantly affect the costs directly associated with liquefaction, which remained at 18<!--> <!-->EUR/(t<!--> <!-->CO<sub>2</sub>) to 21<!--> <!-->EUR/(t<!--> <!-->CO<sub>2</sub>). Removal of the incondensable gases accounted for between 0.1<!--> <!-->EUR/(t<!--> <!-->CO<sub>2</sub>) to 18.7<!--> <!-->EUR/(t<!--> <!-->CO<sub>2</sub>) and depended on the feed gas composition. Higher costs associated with water removal through cooling and higher losses during the distillation process were observed when more impurities were present in the feed gas. This resulted in increased purification costs. The results show that quality requirements from off-takers and transport operators can impose economic drawbacks for emitters. It emphasises the relevance of considering which CO<sub>2</sub> sources are best suitable for different off-takers when impurity constraints are imposed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"336 ","pages":"Article 119839"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of impurities in captured CO2 on the distribution of liquefaction and purification costs\",\"authors\":\"Rikke C. Pedersen , Ebbe H. Jensen , Isaac A. Løge , Brian Elmegaard , Jonas K. Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage is an unavoidable tool in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from energy and industrial sectors. Shared transport infrastructures are necessary to implement the technology on large-scale at acceptable costs. The CO<sub>2</sub> quality varies with different emitters, and if these should use a common infrastructure, it is important to understand the economic effects of the impurities throughout the Carbon Capture value chain. The captured CO<sub>2</sub> is typically purified and liquefied using a conditioning system prior to transportation. This study performs an exergoeconomic analysis of a conditioning process considering four different feed gas compositions. The system was modelled using a chemical process modelling tool, and energy and economic analyses were performed. Exergy was used as a basis for distributing the costs associated with reaching the liquid state and the correct quality, respectively. It was found, that the various feed gas compositions did not significantly affect the costs directly associated with liquefaction, which remained at 18<!--> <!-->EUR/(t<!--> <!-->CO<sub>2</sub>) to 21<!--> <!-->EUR/(t<!--> <!-->CO<sub>2</sub>). Removal of the incondensable gases accounted for between 0.1<!--> <!-->EUR/(t<!--> <!-->CO<sub>2</sub>) to 18.7<!--> <!-->EUR/(t<!--> <!-->CO<sub>2</sub>) and depended on the feed gas composition. Higher costs associated with water removal through cooling and higher losses during the distillation process were observed when more impurities were present in the feed gas. This resulted in increased purification costs. The results show that quality requirements from off-takers and transport operators can impose economic drawbacks for emitters. It emphasises the relevance of considering which CO<sub>2</sub> sources are best suitable for different off-takers when impurity constraints are imposed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"volume\":\"336 \",\"pages\":\"Article 119839\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425003620\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425003620","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of impurities in captured CO2 on the distribution of liquefaction and purification costs
Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage is an unavoidable tool in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from energy and industrial sectors. Shared transport infrastructures are necessary to implement the technology on large-scale at acceptable costs. The CO2 quality varies with different emitters, and if these should use a common infrastructure, it is important to understand the economic effects of the impurities throughout the Carbon Capture value chain. The captured CO2 is typically purified and liquefied using a conditioning system prior to transportation. This study performs an exergoeconomic analysis of a conditioning process considering four different feed gas compositions. The system was modelled using a chemical process modelling tool, and energy and economic analyses were performed. Exergy was used as a basis for distributing the costs associated with reaching the liquid state and the correct quality, respectively. It was found, that the various feed gas compositions did not significantly affect the costs directly associated with liquefaction, which remained at 18 EUR/(t CO2) to 21 EUR/(t CO2). Removal of the incondensable gases accounted for between 0.1 EUR/(t CO2) to 18.7 EUR/(t CO2) and depended on the feed gas composition. Higher costs associated with water removal through cooling and higher losses during the distillation process were observed when more impurities were present in the feed gas. This resulted in increased purification costs. The results show that quality requirements from off-takers and transport operators can impose economic drawbacks for emitters. It emphasises the relevance of considering which CO2 sources are best suitable for different off-takers when impurity constraints are imposed.
期刊介绍:
The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics.
The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.