应用逻辑回归算法预测胆总管结石的App模型:一项前瞻性临床试验

F. García-Villarreal , L.M. Torres-Treviño , C. Herrera-Figueroa , J.O. Jáquez-Quintana , A.A. Garza-Galindo , C.A. Cortez-Hernández , D. García-Compeán , R.A. Jiménez-Castillo , H.J. Maldonado-Garza , J.A. González-González
{"title":"应用逻辑回归算法预测胆总管结石的App模型:一项前瞻性临床试验","authors":"F. García-Villarreal ,&nbsp;L.M. Torres-Treviño ,&nbsp;C. Herrera-Figueroa ,&nbsp;J.O. Jáquez-Quintana ,&nbsp;A.A. Garza-Galindo ,&nbsp;C.A. Cortez-Hernández ,&nbsp;D. García-Compeán ,&nbsp;R.A. Jiménez-Castillo ,&nbsp;H.J. Maldonado-Garza ,&nbsp;J.A. González-González","doi":"10.1016/j.rgmxen.2024.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and aim</h3><div>The diagnostic yield of the current criteria for assigning the risk of choledocholithiasis (CL) is inaccurate. The aim of our work was to develop a logistic regression model for predicting CL diagnosis in patients catalogued as either intermediate or high risk for CL, according to the criteria of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE).</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>We conducted an analytic, observational, cross-sectional study for evaluating the diagnostic yield of a logistic regression model in adults with intermediate or high risk for CL. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was done to determine the best cutoff point for predicting the diagnosis of CL. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was utilized as the gold standard for diagnosing CL.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 148 patients suspected of presenting with CL were studied. In our cohort, 71 had immediate risk and 77 had high risk. CL diagnosis was confirmed in 102 patients (69%). Our model showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68. In patients with an intermediate risk for CL, the AUC value was 0.72 and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 70%. In patients with a high risk for CL, the AUC value was 0.78 and the PPV was 89%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our model appears to better predict the diagnosis of CL than the ASGE criteria for patients with an intermediate or high risk for the disease. Our model can guide clinical decisions in patients with suspected CL.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74705,"journal":{"name":"Revista de gastroenterologia de Mexico (English)","volume":"90 1","pages":"Pages 22-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An App model that utilizes a logistic regression algorithm for predicting choledocholithiasis: A prospective clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"F. García-Villarreal ,&nbsp;L.M. Torres-Treviño ,&nbsp;C. Herrera-Figueroa ,&nbsp;J.O. Jáquez-Quintana ,&nbsp;A.A. Garza-Galindo ,&nbsp;C.A. Cortez-Hernández ,&nbsp;D. García-Compeán ,&nbsp;R.A. Jiménez-Castillo ,&nbsp;H.J. Maldonado-Garza ,&nbsp;J.A. González-González\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rgmxen.2024.05.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and aim</h3><div>The diagnostic yield of the current criteria for assigning the risk of choledocholithiasis (CL) is inaccurate. The aim of our work was to develop a logistic regression model for predicting CL diagnosis in patients catalogued as either intermediate or high risk for CL, according to the criteria of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE).</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>We conducted an analytic, observational, cross-sectional study for evaluating the diagnostic yield of a logistic regression model in adults with intermediate or high risk for CL. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was done to determine the best cutoff point for predicting the diagnosis of CL. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was utilized as the gold standard for diagnosing CL.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 148 patients suspected of presenting with CL were studied. In our cohort, 71 had immediate risk and 77 had high risk. CL diagnosis was confirmed in 102 patients (69%). Our model showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68. In patients with an intermediate risk for CL, the AUC value was 0.72 and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 70%. In patients with a high risk for CL, the AUC value was 0.78 and the PPV was 89%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our model appears to better predict the diagnosis of CL than the ASGE criteria for patients with an intermediate or high risk for the disease. Our model can guide clinical decisions in patients with suspected CL.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de gastroenterologia de Mexico (English)\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 22-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de gastroenterologia de Mexico (English)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255534X25000106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de gastroenterologia de Mexico (English)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255534X25000106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前胆总管结石风险分级标准的诊断结果是不准确的。我们工作的目的是根据美国胃肠内镜学会(ASGE)的标准,建立一个逻辑回归模型,用于预测CL的诊断,这些患者被分类为中度或高风险的CL。材料和方法我们进行了一项分析性、观察性、横断面研究,以评估逻辑回归模型对中度或高风险成人CL的诊断率。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析以确定预测CL诊断的最佳截止点。内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)作为诊断胆管癌的金标准。结果共对148例疑似CL的患者进行了研究。在我们的队列中,71人有直接风险,77人有高风险。102例(69%)患者确诊为CL。我们的模型显示曲线下面积(AUC)为0.68。在中度危险的CL患者中,AUC值为0.72,阳性预测值(PPV)为70%。在CL高风险患者中,AUC值为0.78,PPV为89%。结论我们的模型似乎比ASGE标准更能预测中高风险患者的CL诊断。该模型可以指导疑似CL患者的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An App model that utilizes a logistic regression algorithm for predicting choledocholithiasis: A prospective clinical trial

Introduction and aim

The diagnostic yield of the current criteria for assigning the risk of choledocholithiasis (CL) is inaccurate. The aim of our work was to develop a logistic regression model for predicting CL diagnosis in patients catalogued as either intermediate or high risk for CL, according to the criteria of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE).

Material and methods

We conducted an analytic, observational, cross-sectional study for evaluating the diagnostic yield of a logistic regression model in adults with intermediate or high risk for CL. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was done to determine the best cutoff point for predicting the diagnosis of CL. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was utilized as the gold standard for diagnosing CL.

Results

A total of 148 patients suspected of presenting with CL were studied. In our cohort, 71 had immediate risk and 77 had high risk. CL diagnosis was confirmed in 102 patients (69%). Our model showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68. In patients with an intermediate risk for CL, the AUC value was 0.72 and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 70%. In patients with a high risk for CL, the AUC value was 0.78 and the PPV was 89%.

Conclusion

Our model appears to better predict the diagnosis of CL than the ASGE criteria for patients with an intermediate or high risk for the disease. Our model can guide clinical decisions in patients with suspected CL.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信