Yuting Wang , Han Cui , Xiaoyang Liu , Li Sun , Zhi Sun , Longyi Lv , Guangming Zhang , Wenfang Gao
{"title":"农村生活污水处理过程的层次分析法——以白洋淀为例","authors":"Yuting Wang , Han Cui , Xiaoyang Liu , Li Sun , Zhi Sun , Longyi Lv , Guangming Zhang , Wenfang Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.seppur.2025.133392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Comprehensive evaluation of rural sewage treatment technologies is crucial for optimizing resource utilization, mitigating environmental impacts, and guiding sustainable development strategies in the context of rural infrastructure challenges. However, the comprehensive evaluation of rural domestic sewage faces several challenges (<em>e.g.</em>, lacking of cost-benefit analysis, limited public participation, and insufficient assessment of social impacts). In this research, an analytic hierarchy process integrated with life cycle assessment (LCA) is proposed to comprehensively evaluate the environmental, economic, technological, and societal impaction of typical rural domestic sewage treatment technologies. Anaerobic-anoxic–oxic + membrane bio-reactor (A<sup>2</sup>O-MBR, M1), modified A<sup>2</sup>O-MBR (M2), pre-denitrification-anaerobic-anoxic–oxic + moving bed biofilm reactor (A<sup>3</sup>O-MBBR, M3) and modified A<sup>3</sup>O-MBBR (M4) are selected as typical treatment technologies. Under LCA, M4 shows the smallest environmental impact (1.73E-10), indicating that increasing the sludge reflux rate and the nitrification reflux ratio can effectively mitigate environmental harm, minimize impact, save energy and reduce consumption. Taking all factors into consideration, the indicators (<em>i.e.</em>, global warming potential (1.35 %), total cost of sewage treatment (3.19 %), nitrogen removal efficiency (2.09 %), and localized infrastructure (1.56 %)) significantly influence the comprehensive evaluation. The multi-objective comprehensive assessment demonstrated that M4 (6.88) is the optimal process, followed by M1 (3.73), M3 (5.74) and M2 (5.95). This research provides a reference for the government and enterprises to reform the rural domestic sewage treatment technology from a multi-objective perspective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":427,"journal":{"name":"Separation and Purification Technology","volume":"371 ","pages":"Article 133392"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytic hierarchy process method for rural domestic sewage treatment processes − a case study of Baiyangdian in China\",\"authors\":\"Yuting Wang , Han Cui , Xiaoyang Liu , Li Sun , Zhi Sun , Longyi Lv , Guangming Zhang , Wenfang Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.seppur.2025.133392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Comprehensive evaluation of rural sewage treatment technologies is crucial for optimizing resource utilization, mitigating environmental impacts, and guiding sustainable development strategies in the context of rural infrastructure challenges. However, the comprehensive evaluation of rural domestic sewage faces several challenges (<em>e.g.</em>, lacking of cost-benefit analysis, limited public participation, and insufficient assessment of social impacts). In this research, an analytic hierarchy process integrated with life cycle assessment (LCA) is proposed to comprehensively evaluate the environmental, economic, technological, and societal impaction of typical rural domestic sewage treatment technologies. Anaerobic-anoxic–oxic + membrane bio-reactor (A<sup>2</sup>O-MBR, M1), modified A<sup>2</sup>O-MBR (M2), pre-denitrification-anaerobic-anoxic–oxic + moving bed biofilm reactor (A<sup>3</sup>O-MBBR, M3) and modified A<sup>3</sup>O-MBBR (M4) are selected as typical treatment technologies. Under LCA, M4 shows the smallest environmental impact (1.73E-10), indicating that increasing the sludge reflux rate and the nitrification reflux ratio can effectively mitigate environmental harm, minimize impact, save energy and reduce consumption. Taking all factors into consideration, the indicators (<em>i.e.</em>, global warming potential (1.35 %), total cost of sewage treatment (3.19 %), nitrogen removal efficiency (2.09 %), and localized infrastructure (1.56 %)) significantly influence the comprehensive evaluation. The multi-objective comprehensive assessment demonstrated that M4 (6.88) is the optimal process, followed by M1 (3.73), M3 (5.74) and M2 (5.95). This research provides a reference for the government and enterprises to reform the rural domestic sewage treatment technology from a multi-objective perspective.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Separation and Purification Technology\",\"volume\":\"371 \",\"pages\":\"Article 133392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Separation and Purification Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383586625019896\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Separation and Purification Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383586625019896","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analytic hierarchy process method for rural domestic sewage treatment processes − a case study of Baiyangdian in China
Comprehensive evaluation of rural sewage treatment technologies is crucial for optimizing resource utilization, mitigating environmental impacts, and guiding sustainable development strategies in the context of rural infrastructure challenges. However, the comprehensive evaluation of rural domestic sewage faces several challenges (e.g., lacking of cost-benefit analysis, limited public participation, and insufficient assessment of social impacts). In this research, an analytic hierarchy process integrated with life cycle assessment (LCA) is proposed to comprehensively evaluate the environmental, economic, technological, and societal impaction of typical rural domestic sewage treatment technologies. Anaerobic-anoxic–oxic + membrane bio-reactor (A2O-MBR, M1), modified A2O-MBR (M2), pre-denitrification-anaerobic-anoxic–oxic + moving bed biofilm reactor (A3O-MBBR, M3) and modified A3O-MBBR (M4) are selected as typical treatment technologies. Under LCA, M4 shows the smallest environmental impact (1.73E-10), indicating that increasing the sludge reflux rate and the nitrification reflux ratio can effectively mitigate environmental harm, minimize impact, save energy and reduce consumption. Taking all factors into consideration, the indicators (i.e., global warming potential (1.35 %), total cost of sewage treatment (3.19 %), nitrogen removal efficiency (2.09 %), and localized infrastructure (1.56 %)) significantly influence the comprehensive evaluation. The multi-objective comprehensive assessment demonstrated that M4 (6.88) is the optimal process, followed by M1 (3.73), M3 (5.74) and M2 (5.95). This research provides a reference for the government and enterprises to reform the rural domestic sewage treatment technology from a multi-objective perspective.
期刊介绍:
Separation and Purification Technology is a premier journal committed to sharing innovative methods for separation and purification in chemical and environmental engineering, encompassing both homogeneous solutions and heterogeneous mixtures. Our scope includes the separation and/or purification of liquids, vapors, and gases, as well as carbon capture and separation techniques. However, it's important to note that methods solely intended for analytical purposes are not within the scope of the journal. Additionally, disciplines such as soil science, polymer science, and metallurgy fall outside the purview of Separation and Purification Technology. Join us in advancing the field of separation and purification methods for sustainable solutions in chemical and environmental engineering.