对比敏感度预测认知功能未受损老年人30个月功能性脑网络完整性:脑网络和移动性研究(B-NET)

Alexis D Tanase, Haiying Chen, Michael E Miller, Christina E Hugenschmidt, Jeff D Williamson, Stephen B Kritchevsky, Robert G Lyday, Paul J Laurienti, Atalie C Thompson
{"title":"对比敏感度预测认知功能未受损老年人30个月功能性脑网络完整性:脑网络和移动性研究(B-NET)","authors":"Alexis D Tanase, Haiying Chen, Michael E Miller, Christina E Hugenschmidt, Jeff D Williamson, Stephen B Kritchevsky, Robert G Lyday, Paul J Laurienti, Atalie C Thompson","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Visual contrast sensitivity (CS) is critical to many functions in older adults and is associated with brain network community structure, but the direction of the relationship between CS and the brain remains unclear. Methods We evaluated whether baseline binocular CS predicts 30-month functional brain network organization in 172 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 76.4±4.8 years, 56.4% female, 11.6% non-white/Hispanic) that underwent functional MRI (fMRI) at rest and during a motor imagery (MI) task. We constructed separate distance regression models for each of the 8 subnetworks covering the entire brain, while controlling for the baseline brain networks, sex, and the number of volumes removed during motion scrubbing from head motion in the scanner. Results Worse baseline CS predicted lower community structure integrity at 30-months in the visual network (VN, β=0.0115; p<0.0001), dorsal attention network (DAN, β=0.0075; p=0.0089), and default mode network both at rest (β=0.0173; p<0.0001) and during the MI task (DMN, β=0.0103; p=0.0002). No other networks showed significant associations. The DAN did not have a relationship with CS at baseline but was significant at 30-months. Similar findings were observed in models that additionally controlled for baseline MoCA and change in MoCA score over 30 months. Conclusions Poor CS may identify a subset of older adults at risk of future decrements in brain circuits important for vision, cognitive and mobility functions. Future studies should explore if improving CS increases functional brain health.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrast Sensitivity Predicts 30-month Functional Brain Network Integrity in Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults: the Brain Networks and Mobility Study (B-NET)\",\"authors\":\"Alexis D Tanase, Haiying Chen, Michael E Miller, Christina E Hugenschmidt, Jeff D Williamson, Stephen B Kritchevsky, Robert G Lyday, Paul J Laurienti, Atalie C Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gerona/glaf098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Visual contrast sensitivity (CS) is critical to many functions in older adults and is associated with brain network community structure, but the direction of the relationship between CS and the brain remains unclear. Methods We evaluated whether baseline binocular CS predicts 30-month functional brain network organization in 172 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 76.4±4.8 years, 56.4% female, 11.6% non-white/Hispanic) that underwent functional MRI (fMRI) at rest and during a motor imagery (MI) task. We constructed separate distance regression models for each of the 8 subnetworks covering the entire brain, while controlling for the baseline brain networks, sex, and the number of volumes removed during motion scrubbing from head motion in the scanner. Results Worse baseline CS predicted lower community structure integrity at 30-months in the visual network (VN, β=0.0115; p<0.0001), dorsal attention network (DAN, β=0.0075; p=0.0089), and default mode network both at rest (β=0.0173; p<0.0001) and during the MI task (DMN, β=0.0103; p=0.0002). No other networks showed significant associations. The DAN did not have a relationship with CS at baseline but was significant at 30-months. Similar findings were observed in models that additionally controlled for baseline MoCA and change in MoCA score over 30 months. Conclusions Poor CS may identify a subset of older adults at risk of future decrements in brain circuits important for vision, cognitive and mobility functions. Future studies should explore if improving CS increases functional brain health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

视觉对比敏感性(CS)对老年人的许多功能至关重要,并与大脑网络社区结构有关,但CS与大脑之间的关系方向尚不清楚。方法:我们对172名社区老年人(平均年龄76.4±4.8岁,56.4%为女性,11.6%为非白人/西班牙裔)在休息和运动成像(MI)任务期间进行功能MRI (fMRI)检查,评估基线双眼CS是否能预测30个月功能性脑网络组织。我们为覆盖整个大脑的8个子网络中的每一个构建了单独的距离回归模型,同时控制了基线大脑网络、性别和扫描仪中头部运动中运动擦洗过程中移除的体积数量。结果基线CS较差预示着30个月时视觉网络群落结构完整性较低(VN, β=0.0115;p<0.0001),背侧注意网络(DAN, β=0.0075;P =0.0089),默认模式网络均处于静止状态(β=0.0173;p<0.0001)和在MI任务期间(DMN, β=0.0103;p = 0.0002)。没有其他网络显示出显著的关联。在基线时,DAN与CS没有关系,但在30个月时具有显著性。在额外控制基线MoCA和MoCA评分超过30个月变化的模型中观察到类似的结果。结论:较差的CS可能识别出老年人的一个子集,在未来有视觉、认知和活动功能重要的脑回路下降的风险。未来的研究应该探索改善CS是否会增加大脑的功能性健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contrast Sensitivity Predicts 30-month Functional Brain Network Integrity in Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults: the Brain Networks and Mobility Study (B-NET)
Background Visual contrast sensitivity (CS) is critical to many functions in older adults and is associated with brain network community structure, but the direction of the relationship between CS and the brain remains unclear. Methods We evaluated whether baseline binocular CS predicts 30-month functional brain network organization in 172 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 76.4±4.8 years, 56.4% female, 11.6% non-white/Hispanic) that underwent functional MRI (fMRI) at rest and during a motor imagery (MI) task. We constructed separate distance regression models for each of the 8 subnetworks covering the entire brain, while controlling for the baseline brain networks, sex, and the number of volumes removed during motion scrubbing from head motion in the scanner. Results Worse baseline CS predicted lower community structure integrity at 30-months in the visual network (VN, β=0.0115; p&lt;0.0001), dorsal attention network (DAN, β=0.0075; p=0.0089), and default mode network both at rest (β=0.0173; p&lt;0.0001) and during the MI task (DMN, β=0.0103; p=0.0002). No other networks showed significant associations. The DAN did not have a relationship with CS at baseline but was significant at 30-months. Similar findings were observed in models that additionally controlled for baseline MoCA and change in MoCA score over 30 months. Conclusions Poor CS may identify a subset of older adults at risk of future decrements in brain circuits important for vision, cognitive and mobility functions. Future studies should explore if improving CS increases functional brain health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信