Christopher F. Frazier, Ted D. Harris, Tonya DelSontro, Hans-Peter Grossart, Belinda S.M. Sturm, Jalynn M. Murry, Andrew Ising
{"title":"小规模室外生态系统中与环境相关的草甘膦浓度对浮游植物丰度和甲烷排放的影响最小","authors":"Christopher F. Frazier, Ted D. Harris, Tonya DelSontro, Hans-Peter Grossart, Belinda S.M. Sturm, Jalynn M. Murry, Andrew Ising","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.123764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Glyphosate is one of the most widely applied agrochemicals in North America and can be directly transported via runoff into non-target aquatic habitats. Yet, our understanding of how this herbicide affects aquatic ecosystems is limited; past studies have often focused on single species effects and/or used herbicide concentrations several orders of magnitude higher than what has been reported in contaminated aquatic systems. Further, glyphosate in aquatic systems has the potential to alter greenhouse gas emissions (methane) if it is broken down for phosphate utilization by bacteria under specific environmental conditions (i.e., oxygen, nutrient concentrations). In this study, we assessed the temporal changes in nutrients, phytoplankton, copy number of genes associated with breakdown of glyphosate or production of methane (<em>phn</em>J, <em>mcr</em>A), and methane concentrations in 12-day mesocosms with amendments of glyphosate, nitrogen, and/or phosphorus. We found glyphosate at environmentally-relevant concentrations (∼4 ug/L) did not confer changes in overall ratios and total concentrations of nutrients, or abundance of any major phytoplankton group (cyanobacteria, diatoms, green algae), methane concentration or flux, or gene copy numbers of <em>phn</em>J and <em>mcr</em>A. Our results suggest that the relatively low concentrations of glyphosate we used (relative to levels used in toxicological studies) did not cause major changes over short time periods in mesocosms, and that the potential for glyphosate to increase greenhouse gas emissions in aquatic systems requires specific conditions to occur and may not be universal in contaminated systems.","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phytoplankton abundance and methane emissions are minimally impacted by environmentally-relevant glyphosate concentrations in small-scale outdoor mesocosms\",\"authors\":\"Christopher F. Frazier, Ted D. Harris, Tonya DelSontro, Hans-Peter Grossart, Belinda S.M. Sturm, Jalynn M. Murry, Andrew Ising\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.watres.2025.123764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Glyphosate is one of the most widely applied agrochemicals in North America and can be directly transported via runoff into non-target aquatic habitats. Yet, our understanding of how this herbicide affects aquatic ecosystems is limited; past studies have often focused on single species effects and/or used herbicide concentrations several orders of magnitude higher than what has been reported in contaminated aquatic systems. Further, glyphosate in aquatic systems has the potential to alter greenhouse gas emissions (methane) if it is broken down for phosphate utilization by bacteria under specific environmental conditions (i.e., oxygen, nutrient concentrations). In this study, we assessed the temporal changes in nutrients, phytoplankton, copy number of genes associated with breakdown of glyphosate or production of methane (<em>phn</em>J, <em>mcr</em>A), and methane concentrations in 12-day mesocosms with amendments of glyphosate, nitrogen, and/or phosphorus. We found glyphosate at environmentally-relevant concentrations (∼4 ug/L) did not confer changes in overall ratios and total concentrations of nutrients, or abundance of any major phytoplankton group (cyanobacteria, diatoms, green algae), methane concentration or flux, or gene copy numbers of <em>phn</em>J and <em>mcr</em>A. Our results suggest that the relatively low concentrations of glyphosate we used (relative to levels used in toxicological studies) did not cause major changes over short time periods in mesocosms, and that the potential for glyphosate to increase greenhouse gas emissions in aquatic systems requires specific conditions to occur and may not be universal in contaminated systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Research\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.123764\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.123764","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Phytoplankton abundance and methane emissions are minimally impacted by environmentally-relevant glyphosate concentrations in small-scale outdoor mesocosms
Glyphosate is one of the most widely applied agrochemicals in North America and can be directly transported via runoff into non-target aquatic habitats. Yet, our understanding of how this herbicide affects aquatic ecosystems is limited; past studies have often focused on single species effects and/or used herbicide concentrations several orders of magnitude higher than what has been reported in contaminated aquatic systems. Further, glyphosate in aquatic systems has the potential to alter greenhouse gas emissions (methane) if it is broken down for phosphate utilization by bacteria under specific environmental conditions (i.e., oxygen, nutrient concentrations). In this study, we assessed the temporal changes in nutrients, phytoplankton, copy number of genes associated with breakdown of glyphosate or production of methane (phnJ, mcrA), and methane concentrations in 12-day mesocosms with amendments of glyphosate, nitrogen, and/or phosphorus. We found glyphosate at environmentally-relevant concentrations (∼4 ug/L) did not confer changes in overall ratios and total concentrations of nutrients, or abundance of any major phytoplankton group (cyanobacteria, diatoms, green algae), methane concentration or flux, or gene copy numbers of phnJ and mcrA. Our results suggest that the relatively low concentrations of glyphosate we used (relative to levels used in toxicological studies) did not cause major changes over short time periods in mesocosms, and that the potential for glyphosate to increase greenhouse gas emissions in aquatic systems requires specific conditions to occur and may not be universal in contaminated systems.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.