{"title":"临界混合双尖峰技术分析31种地质标准物质的δ26Mg值","authors":"Yinchu Zhang, Weijuan Yang, Yang Wang, Yongsheng He, Shan Ke, Kezhen Qu, Shiying Zhang","doi":"10.1111/ggr.12598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Stable Mg delta values (the relative deviation from a certain reference material, e.g., DSM-3 here and expressed as δ<sup>26</sup>Mg<sub>DSM-3</sub>) were routinely measured by the sample-standard bracketing (SSB) method on a multi-collector ICP-MS, as only three isotopes (i.e., <sup>24</sup>Mg, <sup>25</sup>Mg and <sup>26</sup>Mg) naturally exist. Due to potential inaccuracy in correcting mass bias during measurements, considerable measurement bias has been reported among laboratories. Recently, a critical mixture double spike (CMDS) technique has been developed and demonstrated to accurately correct mass bias of measurement results with precision of ± 0.03‰ for δ<sup>26</sup>Mg. Here, we measured thirty-one geological reference materials including igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rocks, sediments and minerals using the CMDS technique, with the purpose of better characterising their δ<sup>26</sup>Mg<sub>DSM-3</sub> values. Aligning with the data previously reported, uncorrected bias, on average measured by ∆<sup>26</sup>Mg<sub>SSB-CMDS</sub> (i.e., δ<sup>26</sup>Mg<sub>SSB</sub> - δ<sup>26</sup>Mg<sub>CMDS</sub>) as -0.071 ± 0.092‰ (2<i>s</i>, <i>n =</i> 42), has been reaffirmed for the traditional SSB method. Such uncorrected bias positively correlates with sample Mg/(Si+Al+Ca), and thus may result from the accumulative effect of residual matrix elements. The new data set herein can aid future inter-laboratory comparison and data quality control.</p>","PeriodicalId":12631,"journal":{"name":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","volume":"49 2","pages":"315-327"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"δ26Mg Values of Thirty-One Geological Reference Materials Analysed by the Critical Mixture Double Spike Technique\",\"authors\":\"Yinchu Zhang, Weijuan Yang, Yang Wang, Yongsheng He, Shan Ke, Kezhen Qu, Shiying Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ggr.12598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Stable Mg delta values (the relative deviation from a certain reference material, e.g., DSM-3 here and expressed as δ<sup>26</sup>Mg<sub>DSM-3</sub>) were routinely measured by the sample-standard bracketing (SSB) method on a multi-collector ICP-MS, as only three isotopes (i.e., <sup>24</sup>Mg, <sup>25</sup>Mg and <sup>26</sup>Mg) naturally exist. Due to potential inaccuracy in correcting mass bias during measurements, considerable measurement bias has been reported among laboratories. Recently, a critical mixture double spike (CMDS) technique has been developed and demonstrated to accurately correct mass bias of measurement results with precision of ± 0.03‰ for δ<sup>26</sup>Mg. Here, we measured thirty-one geological reference materials including igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rocks, sediments and minerals using the CMDS technique, with the purpose of better characterising their δ<sup>26</sup>Mg<sub>DSM-3</sub> values. Aligning with the data previously reported, uncorrected bias, on average measured by ∆<sup>26</sup>Mg<sub>SSB-CMDS</sub> (i.e., δ<sup>26</sup>Mg<sub>SSB</sub> - δ<sup>26</sup>Mg<sub>CMDS</sub>) as -0.071 ± 0.092‰ (2<i>s</i>, <i>n =</i> 42), has been reaffirmed for the traditional SSB method. Such uncorrected bias positively correlates with sample Mg/(Si+Al+Ca), and thus may result from the accumulative effect of residual matrix elements. The new data set herein can aid future inter-laboratory comparison and data quality control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research\",\"volume\":\"49 2\",\"pages\":\"315-327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggr.12598\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggr.12598","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
δ26Mg Values of Thirty-One Geological Reference Materials Analysed by the Critical Mixture Double Spike Technique
Stable Mg delta values (the relative deviation from a certain reference material, e.g., DSM-3 here and expressed as δ26MgDSM-3) were routinely measured by the sample-standard bracketing (SSB) method on a multi-collector ICP-MS, as only three isotopes (i.e., 24Mg, 25Mg and 26Mg) naturally exist. Due to potential inaccuracy in correcting mass bias during measurements, considerable measurement bias has been reported among laboratories. Recently, a critical mixture double spike (CMDS) technique has been developed and demonstrated to accurately correct mass bias of measurement results with precision of ± 0.03‰ for δ26Mg. Here, we measured thirty-one geological reference materials including igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rocks, sediments and minerals using the CMDS technique, with the purpose of better characterising their δ26MgDSM-3 values. Aligning with the data previously reported, uncorrected bias, on average measured by ∆26MgSSB-CMDS (i.e., δ26MgSSB - δ26MgCMDS) as -0.071 ± 0.092‰ (2s, n = 42), has been reaffirmed for the traditional SSB method. Such uncorrected bias positively correlates with sample Mg/(Si+Al+Ca), and thus may result from the accumulative effect of residual matrix elements. The new data set herein can aid future inter-laboratory comparison and data quality control.
期刊介绍:
Geostandards & Geoanalytical Research is an international journal dedicated to advancing the science of reference materials, analytical techniques and data quality relevant to the chemical analysis of geological and environmental samples. Papers are accepted for publication following peer review.