个人对物联网的接受度:Meta分析综述

IF 8.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Nishita Gupta, Ajay Kumar Singh
{"title":"个人对物联网的接受度:Meta分析综述","authors":"Nishita Gupta,&nbsp;Ajay Kumar Singh","doi":"10.1111/ijcs.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Given the pivotal role that IoT technologies play in revolutionizing industries and enhancing everyday connectivity, this study aims to unravel the key factors driving individual intention to adopt IoT while also identifying the obstacles that may impede their acceptance. This study consolidates existing research findings by conducting a comprehensive meta-analysis. The authors performed a meta- analysis of 92 articles, resulting in 96 observations from a combined sample of 30,024 respondents. This study introduces an integrated framework that combines theoretical frameworks and empirical data to elucidate the complex dynamics underpinning individual IoT intention across a spectrum of diverse settings. It underscores that user intention is highly context-specific, necessitating consideration of both technological attributes and psychological influences. We identified 18 constructs as antecedents of intention to use IoT derived from the theory of reasoned action/planned behavior, technology acceptance model, unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, and IS success model. Out of these 18 constructs, 16 were found to be significant, and the key factors influencing intention to use IoT were found to be habit, performance expectancy, service quality, social influence, and attitude. To investigate the potential reasons for contradictory findings across studies, a subgroup analysis was conducted. This study attempted to understand the role of methodological moderators (sample size, publication type, year of publication), cultural and economic moderators (culture, economic level) and theoretical moderators (innovation level, digital readiness level). Thus, analyzing the variability in effect sizes across existing studies offers a critical opportunity to uncover the factors that drive differences in the relationship between individual intentions to adopt IoT. Practically, this meta-analysis gives useful information for companies looking to increase individual adoption of IoT. Businesses may increase IoT adoption by making it more habitual, user-friendly, useful, and attractive. This article offers a comprehensive analysis of IoT intention, highlighting its advantages and challenges, and proposes avenues for future research in the context of consumer studies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48192,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","volume":"49 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual Acceptance of Internet of Things: A Meta Analytical Review\",\"authors\":\"Nishita Gupta,&nbsp;Ajay Kumar Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijcs.70070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Given the pivotal role that IoT technologies play in revolutionizing industries and enhancing everyday connectivity, this study aims to unravel the key factors driving individual intention to adopt IoT while also identifying the obstacles that may impede their acceptance. This study consolidates existing research findings by conducting a comprehensive meta-analysis. The authors performed a meta- analysis of 92 articles, resulting in 96 observations from a combined sample of 30,024 respondents. This study introduces an integrated framework that combines theoretical frameworks and empirical data to elucidate the complex dynamics underpinning individual IoT intention across a spectrum of diverse settings. It underscores that user intention is highly context-specific, necessitating consideration of both technological attributes and psychological influences. We identified 18 constructs as antecedents of intention to use IoT derived from the theory of reasoned action/planned behavior, technology acceptance model, unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, and IS success model. Out of these 18 constructs, 16 were found to be significant, and the key factors influencing intention to use IoT were found to be habit, performance expectancy, service quality, social influence, and attitude. To investigate the potential reasons for contradictory findings across studies, a subgroup analysis was conducted. This study attempted to understand the role of methodological moderators (sample size, publication type, year of publication), cultural and economic moderators (culture, economic level) and theoretical moderators (innovation level, digital readiness level). Thus, analyzing the variability in effect sizes across existing studies offers a critical opportunity to uncover the factors that drive differences in the relationship between individual intentions to adopt IoT. Practically, this meta-analysis gives useful information for companies looking to increase individual adoption of IoT. Businesses may increase IoT adoption by making it more habitual, user-friendly, useful, and attractive. This article offers a comprehensive analysis of IoT intention, highlighting its advantages and challenges, and proposes avenues for future research in the context of consumer studies.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Consumer Studies\",\"volume\":\"49 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Consumer Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.70070\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.70070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于物联网技术在变革行业和增强日常连接方面发挥的关键作用,本研究旨在揭示推动个人采用物联网意愿的关键因素,同时确定可能阻碍其接受的障碍。本研究通过全面的荟萃分析巩固了现有的研究成果。作者对92篇文章进行了荟萃分析,从30,024名受访者的联合样本中得出了96项观察结果。本研究引入了一个综合框架,将理论框架和经验数据相结合,以阐明在不同环境下支撑个人物联网意图的复杂动态。它强调用户的意图是高度具体的,需要考虑到技术属性和心理影响。我们从理性行动/计划行为理论、技术接受模型、技术接受与使用统一理论和信息系统成功模型中确定了18个概念作为使用物联网意图的前因。在这18个构式中,有16个被发现是显著的,影响使用物联网意愿的关键因素被发现是习惯、绩效预期、服务质量、社会影响力和态度。为了调查研究结果相互矛盾的潜在原因,进行了亚组分析。本研究试图了解方法调节因子(样本量、出版类型、出版年份)、文化和经济调节因子(文化、经济水平)和理论调节因子(创新水平、数字化准备水平)的作用。因此,分析现有研究中效应大小的可变性提供了一个关键机会,可以揭示导致采用物联网的个人意图之间关系差异的因素。实际上,这一荟萃分析为希望增加个人物联网采用的公司提供了有用的信息。企业可以通过使物联网更加习惯、用户友好、有用和有吸引力来增加物联网的采用。本文对物联网意图进行了全面分析,强调了其优势和挑战,并在消费者研究的背景下提出了未来研究的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individual Acceptance of Internet of Things: A Meta Analytical Review

Given the pivotal role that IoT technologies play in revolutionizing industries and enhancing everyday connectivity, this study aims to unravel the key factors driving individual intention to adopt IoT while also identifying the obstacles that may impede their acceptance. This study consolidates existing research findings by conducting a comprehensive meta-analysis. The authors performed a meta- analysis of 92 articles, resulting in 96 observations from a combined sample of 30,024 respondents. This study introduces an integrated framework that combines theoretical frameworks and empirical data to elucidate the complex dynamics underpinning individual IoT intention across a spectrum of diverse settings. It underscores that user intention is highly context-specific, necessitating consideration of both technological attributes and psychological influences. We identified 18 constructs as antecedents of intention to use IoT derived from the theory of reasoned action/planned behavior, technology acceptance model, unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, and IS success model. Out of these 18 constructs, 16 were found to be significant, and the key factors influencing intention to use IoT were found to be habit, performance expectancy, service quality, social influence, and attitude. To investigate the potential reasons for contradictory findings across studies, a subgroup analysis was conducted. This study attempted to understand the role of methodological moderators (sample size, publication type, year of publication), cultural and economic moderators (culture, economic level) and theoretical moderators (innovation level, digital readiness level). Thus, analyzing the variability in effect sizes across existing studies offers a critical opportunity to uncover the factors that drive differences in the relationship between individual intentions to adopt IoT. Practically, this meta-analysis gives useful information for companies looking to increase individual adoption of IoT. Businesses may increase IoT adoption by making it more habitual, user-friendly, useful, and attractive. This article offers a comprehensive analysis of IoT intention, highlighting its advantages and challenges, and proposes avenues for future research in the context of consumer studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
23.20%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Consumer Studies is a scholarly platform for consumer research, welcoming academic and research papers across all realms of consumer studies. Our publication showcases articles of global interest, presenting cutting-edge research from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信