疾病预期与哮喘症状:一项为期6个月的纵向研究

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Eleonora Volpato, Valentina Poletti, Paolo Banfi, Andrea Bonanomi, Francesco Pagnini
{"title":"疾病预期与哮喘症状:一项为期6个月的纵向研究","authors":"Eleonora Volpato,&nbsp;Valentina Poletti,&nbsp;Paolo Banfi,&nbsp;Andrea Bonanomi,&nbsp;Francesco Pagnini","doi":"10.1111/hex.70285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>After receiving a diagnosis, individuals often develop expectations about how their condition will evolve. This cognitive framework, known as ‘Illness Expectations’ (IEs), encompasses future-oriented beliefs regarding the course of the illness and its symptoms. In chronic conditions such as asthma, IEs may play a critical role in shaping patient-reported outcomes and clinical markers of disease progression. This study aims to empirically evaluate the impact of IEs on asthma symptoms and respiratory function.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cohort of 310 individuals diagnosed with asthma was followed over a 6-month period, with three assessment points. Asthma control was measured using the Asthma Control Test (ACT), while respiratory function was evaluated through forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>) using spirometry. IEs were assessed using the validated ‘Illness Expectation Test’ (IET), which captures both explicit (conscious) and implicit (unconscious) expectations. Predictive analyses were conducted using latent growth modelling and linear regression to examine the influence of IEs on asthma symptoms and respiratory function over time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>People with more negative explicit IEs about their asthma reported worse symptoms over time (<i>β</i> = −0.50, SE = 0.21, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Implicit IEs were not statistically significant (<i>β</i> = −0.014, SE = 0.008, <i>p</i> = 0.09). Explicit IEs about symptom progression were also associated with changes in lung function, with more negative expectations predicting greater declines in respiratory performance (<i>β</i> = 0.51, SE = 0.11, <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings suggest that IEs may be meaningfully associated with asthma outcomes, highlighting their potential relevance in understanding patient experiences and symptom perception. These results support further research into interventions targeting cognitive frameworks, with the aim of informing more personalised, patient-centred approaches to asthma management.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>This study was developed in response to patient-reported challenges in asthma management, particularly around understanding and managing IEs. Patients contributed to identifying key areas of concern, and their perspectives informed the choice of outcomes and tools. While direct involvement in recruitment and dissemination was limited due to the pandemic, the study's design and focus were guided by patient priorities, with potential applications in clinical consultations and future co-designed interventions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70285","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illness Expectations and Asthma Symptoms: A 6-Month Longitudinal Study\",\"authors\":\"Eleonora Volpato,&nbsp;Valentina Poletti,&nbsp;Paolo Banfi,&nbsp;Andrea Bonanomi,&nbsp;Francesco Pagnini\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hex.70285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>After receiving a diagnosis, individuals often develop expectations about how their condition will evolve. This cognitive framework, known as ‘Illness Expectations’ (IEs), encompasses future-oriented beliefs regarding the course of the illness and its symptoms. In chronic conditions such as asthma, IEs may play a critical role in shaping patient-reported outcomes and clinical markers of disease progression. This study aims to empirically evaluate the impact of IEs on asthma symptoms and respiratory function.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A cohort of 310 individuals diagnosed with asthma was followed over a 6-month period, with three assessment points. Asthma control was measured using the Asthma Control Test (ACT), while respiratory function was evaluated through forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>) using spirometry. IEs were assessed using the validated ‘Illness Expectation Test’ (IET), which captures both explicit (conscious) and implicit (unconscious) expectations. Predictive analyses were conducted using latent growth modelling and linear regression to examine the influence of IEs on asthma symptoms and respiratory function over time.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>People with more negative explicit IEs about their asthma reported worse symptoms over time (<i>β</i> = −0.50, SE = 0.21, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Implicit IEs were not statistically significant (<i>β</i> = −0.014, SE = 0.008, <i>p</i> = 0.09). Explicit IEs about symptom progression were also associated with changes in lung function, with more negative expectations predicting greater declines in respiratory performance (<i>β</i> = 0.51, SE = 0.11, <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>These findings suggest that IEs may be meaningfully associated with asthma outcomes, highlighting their potential relevance in understanding patient experiences and symptom perception. These results support further research into interventions targeting cognitive frameworks, with the aim of informing more personalised, patient-centred approaches to asthma management.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study was developed in response to patient-reported challenges in asthma management, particularly around understanding and managing IEs. Patients contributed to identifying key areas of concern, and their perspectives informed the choice of outcomes and tools. While direct involvement in recruitment and dissemination was limited due to the pandemic, the study's design and focus were guided by patient priorities, with potential applications in clinical consultations and future co-designed interventions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Expectations\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70285\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Expectations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70285\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70285","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在接受诊断后,个体通常会对自己的病情发展产生期望。这种认知框架被称为“疾病预期”(IEs),包含了关于疾病过程及其症状的面向未来的信念。在慢性疾病如哮喘中,IEs可能在形成患者报告的结果和疾病进展的临床标志物方面发挥关键作用。本研究旨在实证评估IEs对哮喘症状及呼吸功能的影响。方法对310例哮喘患者进行为期6个月的随访,分为3个评估点。采用哮喘控制试验(ACT)评估哮喘控制情况,肺活量测定法通过1 s用力呼气量(FEV1)评估呼吸功能。使用经过验证的“疾病预期测试”(IET)对IEs进行评估,该测试捕获显性(有意识)和隐性(无意识)期望。使用潜在生长模型和线性回归进行预测分析,以检查IEs对哮喘症状和呼吸功能的影响。结果明确IEs越阴性的哮喘患者症状越严重(β = - 0.50, SE = 0.21, p = 0.01)。隐性IEs差异无统计学意义(β = - 0.014, SE = 0.008, p = 0.09)。关于症状进展的明确IEs也与肺功能的变化有关,越负面的期望预示着呼吸功能的下降越大(β = 0.51, SE = 0.11, p = 0.001)。这些发现表明,IEs可能与哮喘结局有意义的关联,强调了它们在理解患者经历和症状感知方面的潜在相关性。这些结果支持进一步研究针对认知框架的干预措施,目的是为哮喘管理提供更个性化、以患者为中心的方法。本研究是针对患者报告的哮喘管理方面的挑战而开展的,特别是在理解和管理IEs方面。患者有助于确定关注的关键领域,他们的观点为结果和工具的选择提供了信息。虽然由于大流行,直接参与招募和传播工作受到限制,但该研究的设计和重点以患者优先事项为指导,可能应用于临床咨询和未来共同设计的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Illness Expectations and Asthma Symptoms: A 6-Month Longitudinal Study

Illness Expectations and Asthma Symptoms: A 6-Month Longitudinal Study

Background

After receiving a diagnosis, individuals often develop expectations about how their condition will evolve. This cognitive framework, known as ‘Illness Expectations’ (IEs), encompasses future-oriented beliefs regarding the course of the illness and its symptoms. In chronic conditions such as asthma, IEs may play a critical role in shaping patient-reported outcomes and clinical markers of disease progression. This study aims to empirically evaluate the impact of IEs on asthma symptoms and respiratory function.

Methods

A cohort of 310 individuals diagnosed with asthma was followed over a 6-month period, with three assessment points. Asthma control was measured using the Asthma Control Test (ACT), while respiratory function was evaluated through forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) using spirometry. IEs were assessed using the validated ‘Illness Expectation Test’ (IET), which captures both explicit (conscious) and implicit (unconscious) expectations. Predictive analyses were conducted using latent growth modelling and linear regression to examine the influence of IEs on asthma symptoms and respiratory function over time.

Results

People with more negative explicit IEs about their asthma reported worse symptoms over time (β = −0.50, SE = 0.21, p = 0.01). Implicit IEs were not statistically significant (β = −0.014, SE = 0.008, p = 0.09). Explicit IEs about symptom progression were also associated with changes in lung function, with more negative expectations predicting greater declines in respiratory performance (β = 0.51, SE = 0.11, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that IEs may be meaningfully associated with asthma outcomes, highlighting their potential relevance in understanding patient experiences and symptom perception. These results support further research into interventions targeting cognitive frameworks, with the aim of informing more personalised, patient-centred approaches to asthma management.

Patient or Public Contribution

This study was developed in response to patient-reported challenges in asthma management, particularly around understanding and managing IEs. Patients contributed to identifying key areas of concern, and their perspectives informed the choice of outcomes and tools. While direct involvement in recruitment and dissemination was limited due to the pandemic, the study's design and focus were guided by patient priorities, with potential applications in clinical consultations and future co-designed interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信