Guangyao Jiang, Xiangyu Yang, Guanghui Zhu, Tang Liu
{"title":"降糖药对肥胖膝骨关节炎患者的比较疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析","authors":"Guangyao Jiang, Xiangyu Yang, Guanghui Zhu, Tang Liu","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03017-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Obesity-related knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a significant public health concern, affecting quality of life. Recent evidence suggests some antidiabetic drugs may help manage KOA in obese patients due to their anti-inflammatory and weight-reducing effects.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of antidiabetic drugs for managing pain and adverse events in obese KOA patients through a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search of multiple databases identified relevant RCTs on antidiabetic drugs for KOA. Treatment efficacy was assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score improvement, and safety was evaluated based on the incidence of serious adverse events. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) scores were used to rank the treatments, and effect sizes were reported as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of nine RCTs were included in the analysis. For pain relief, metformin demonstrated the largest effect size with a mean difference of − 1.13 (95% CI − 1.48, − 0.78) compared to usual care, followed by Metformin-Phosphatidylcholine (MFPH) (− 0.92, 95% CI − 1.70, − 0.13) and semaglutide (− 0.90, 95% CI − 1.48, − 0.32). In terms of safety, usual care exhibited the lowest risk of adverse events, with liraglutide (0.09, 95% CI − 0.74, 0.92) and semaglutide (0.21, 95% CI − 0.46, 0.88) also showing favorable safety profiles. The SUCRA rankings further supported these findings, with metformin ranking highest for efficacy (SUCRA: 86.8%) and usual care ranking highest for safety (SUCRA: 75.7%). However, these rankings should be interpreted alongside the effect sizes and clinical context to fully assess the trade-offs between efficacy and safety across interventions.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Metformin and MFPH are promising for managing KOA pain in obese patients. Semaglutide offers a balanced efficacy and safety profile, while liraglutide may be a safe option for selected patients. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and assess long-term outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-03017-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy and safety of antidiabetic drugs for obese patients with knee osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Guangyao Jiang, Xiangyu Yang, Guanghui Zhu, Tang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40520-025-03017-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Obesity-related knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a significant public health concern, affecting quality of life. Recent evidence suggests some antidiabetic drugs may help manage KOA in obese patients due to their anti-inflammatory and weight-reducing effects.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of antidiabetic drugs for managing pain and adverse events in obese KOA patients through a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search of multiple databases identified relevant RCTs on antidiabetic drugs for KOA. Treatment efficacy was assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score improvement, and safety was evaluated based on the incidence of serious adverse events. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) scores were used to rank the treatments, and effect sizes were reported as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of nine RCTs were included in the analysis. For pain relief, metformin demonstrated the largest effect size with a mean difference of − 1.13 (95% CI − 1.48, − 0.78) compared to usual care, followed by Metformin-Phosphatidylcholine (MFPH) (− 0.92, 95% CI − 1.70, − 0.13) and semaglutide (− 0.90, 95% CI − 1.48, − 0.32). In terms of safety, usual care exhibited the lowest risk of adverse events, with liraglutide (0.09, 95% CI − 0.74, 0.92) and semaglutide (0.21, 95% CI − 0.46, 0.88) also showing favorable safety profiles. The SUCRA rankings further supported these findings, with metformin ranking highest for efficacy (SUCRA: 86.8%) and usual care ranking highest for safety (SUCRA: 75.7%). However, these rankings should be interpreted alongside the effect sizes and clinical context to fully assess the trade-offs between efficacy and safety across interventions.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Metformin and MFPH are promising for managing KOA pain in obese patients. Semaglutide offers a balanced efficacy and safety profile, while liraglutide may be a safe option for selected patients. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and assess long-term outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-03017-4.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03017-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03017-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肥胖相关性膝骨关节炎(KOA)是影响生活质量的重大公共卫生问题。最近的证据表明,一些抗糖尿病药物可能有助于控制肥胖患者的KOA,因为它们具有抗炎和减肥作用。目的通过随机对照试验(rct)的网络meta分析,比较降糖药物治疗肥胖KOA患者疼痛和不良事件的疗效和安全性。方法系统检索多个数据库,确定抗糖尿病药物治疗KOA的相关随机对照试验。采用Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)疼痛评分改善来评估治疗效果,并根据严重不良事件的发生率来评估安全性。采用累积排序曲线下曲面(SUCRA)评分对处理进行排序,效应量以95%置信区间(CI)的平均差异(MD)报告。结果共纳入9项rct。对于疼痛缓解,与常规治疗相比,二甲双胍显示出最大的效应值,平均差异为- 1.13 (95% CI - 1.48, - 0.78),其次是二甲双胍-磷脂酰胆碱(MFPH) (- 0.92, 95% CI - 1.70, - 0.13)和semaglutide (- 0.90, 95% CI - 1.48, - 0.32)。在安全性方面,常规护理显示出最低的不良事件风险,利拉鲁肽(0.09,95% CI - 0.74, 0.92)和西马鲁肽(0.21,95% CI - 0.46, 0.88)也显示出良好的安全性。SUCRA排名进一步支持了这些发现,二甲双胍在疗效方面排名最高(SUCRA: 86.8%),常规护理在安全性方面排名最高(SUCRA: 75.7%)。然而,这些排名应该与效果大小和临床背景一起解释,以充分评估干预措施的有效性和安全性之间的权衡。结论二甲双胍联合MFPH治疗肥胖患者KOA疼痛有较好的疗效。Semaglutide提供了一个平衡的疗效和安全性,而利拉鲁肽可能是一个安全的选择,为选定的患者。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现并评估长期结果。
Comparative efficacy and safety of antidiabetic drugs for obese patients with knee osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Background
Obesity-related knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a significant public health concern, affecting quality of life. Recent evidence suggests some antidiabetic drugs may help manage KOA in obese patients due to their anti-inflammatory and weight-reducing effects.
Objective
This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of antidiabetic drugs for managing pain and adverse events in obese KOA patients through a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods
A systematic search of multiple databases identified relevant RCTs on antidiabetic drugs for KOA. Treatment efficacy was assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score improvement, and safety was evaluated based on the incidence of serious adverse events. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) scores were used to rank the treatments, and effect sizes were reported as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results
A total of nine RCTs were included in the analysis. For pain relief, metformin demonstrated the largest effect size with a mean difference of − 1.13 (95% CI − 1.48, − 0.78) compared to usual care, followed by Metformin-Phosphatidylcholine (MFPH) (− 0.92, 95% CI − 1.70, − 0.13) and semaglutide (− 0.90, 95% CI − 1.48, − 0.32). In terms of safety, usual care exhibited the lowest risk of adverse events, with liraglutide (0.09, 95% CI − 0.74, 0.92) and semaglutide (0.21, 95% CI − 0.46, 0.88) also showing favorable safety profiles. The SUCRA rankings further supported these findings, with metformin ranking highest for efficacy (SUCRA: 86.8%) and usual care ranking highest for safety (SUCRA: 75.7%). However, these rankings should be interpreted alongside the effect sizes and clinical context to fully assess the trade-offs between efficacy and safety across interventions.
Conclusions
Metformin and MFPH are promising for managing KOA pain in obese patients. Semaglutide offers a balanced efficacy and safety profile, while liraglutide may be a safe option for selected patients. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and assess long-term outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.