在远程独立评分的背景下评估精神分裂症的阴性症状:对BNSS和PANSS的心理测量学评估

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Kazunori Tatsumi, Alexandra Parfitt, Lisa Weissfeld, Mark Opler
{"title":"在远程独立评分的背景下评估精神分裂症的阴性症状:对BNSS和PANSS的心理测量学评估","authors":"Kazunori Tatsumi,&nbsp;Alexandra Parfitt,&nbsp;Lisa Weissfeld,&nbsp;Mark Opler","doi":"10.1016/j.schres.2025.04.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous traditional psychometric validation studies have demonstrated that the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) have satisfactory psychometric properties in patients with schizophrenia. The objective of the current study is to expand this literature by evaluating the psychometric properties of both scales in a large, multicenter, multicultural, randomized control clinical trial in patients with schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms. The current study employs independent ratings, in which raters are blinded from the study protocol and administer both scales via videoconference. The BNSS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93). The results of discriminant and concurrent validity analyses supported the construct validity of the assessment. The exploratory factor analysis of the PANSS identified five distinct factors. Overall, BNSS and PANSS demonstrate good psychometric properties that are comparable to previous findings that were derived from traditional psychometric studies, typically conducted at a single site and utilizing face-to-face ratings. Our findings suggest that negative symptoms of schizophrenia can validly be measured using the BNSS and PANSS via remote methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21417,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research","volume":"281 ","pages":"Pages 108-114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing negative symptoms of schizophrenia in the context of remote independent ratings: a psychometric evaluation of BNSS and PANSS\",\"authors\":\"Kazunori Tatsumi,&nbsp;Alexandra Parfitt,&nbsp;Lisa Weissfeld,&nbsp;Mark Opler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.schres.2025.04.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Previous traditional psychometric validation studies have demonstrated that the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) have satisfactory psychometric properties in patients with schizophrenia. The objective of the current study is to expand this literature by evaluating the psychometric properties of both scales in a large, multicenter, multicultural, randomized control clinical trial in patients with schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms. The current study employs independent ratings, in which raters are blinded from the study protocol and administer both scales via videoconference. The BNSS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93). The results of discriminant and concurrent validity analyses supported the construct validity of the assessment. The exploratory factor analysis of the PANSS identified five distinct factors. Overall, BNSS and PANSS demonstrate good psychometric properties that are comparable to previous findings that were derived from traditional psychometric studies, typically conducted at a single site and utilizing face-to-face ratings. Our findings suggest that negative symptoms of schizophrenia can validly be measured using the BNSS and PANSS via remote methods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schizophrenia Research\",\"volume\":\"281 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 108-114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schizophrenia Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092099642500163X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092099642500163X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的心理测量验证研究表明,简短阴性症状量表(BNSS)和阳性阴性症状量表(PANSS)在精神分裂症患者中具有令人满意的心理测量特性。本研究的目的是通过在以阴性症状为主的精神分裂症患者中进行一项大型、多中心、多文化、随机对照临床试验,评估两种量表的心理测量特性,从而扩大这一文献。目前的研究采用独立评分,其中评分者对研究协议不知情,并通过视频会议管理两种量表。BNSS具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.93)。判别效度分析和并行效度分析的结果支持评估的构念效度。PANSS的探索性因素分析确定了五个不同的因素。总的来说,BNSS和PANSS显示出良好的心理测量特性,与传统的心理测量研究结果相媲美,传统的心理测量研究通常在一个地点进行,利用面对面的评分。我们的研究结果表明,使用BNSS和PANSS可以通过远程方法有效地测量精神分裂症的阴性症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing negative symptoms of schizophrenia in the context of remote independent ratings: a psychometric evaluation of BNSS and PANSS
Previous traditional psychometric validation studies have demonstrated that the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) have satisfactory psychometric properties in patients with schizophrenia. The objective of the current study is to expand this literature by evaluating the psychometric properties of both scales in a large, multicenter, multicultural, randomized control clinical trial in patients with schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms. The current study employs independent ratings, in which raters are blinded from the study protocol and administer both scales via videoconference. The BNSS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93). The results of discriminant and concurrent validity analyses supported the construct validity of the assessment. The exploratory factor analysis of the PANSS identified five distinct factors. Overall, BNSS and PANSS demonstrate good psychometric properties that are comparable to previous findings that were derived from traditional psychometric studies, typically conducted at a single site and utilizing face-to-face ratings. Our findings suggest that negative symptoms of schizophrenia can validly be measured using the BNSS and PANSS via remote methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Schizophrenia Research
Schizophrenia Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
8.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
10.2 weeks
期刊介绍: As official journal of the Schizophrenia International Research Society (SIRS) Schizophrenia Research is THE journal of choice for international researchers and clinicians to share their work with the global schizophrenia research community. More than 6000 institutes have online or print (or both) access to this journal - the largest specialist journal in the field, with the largest readership! Schizophrenia Research''s time to first decision is as fast as 6 weeks and its publishing speed is as fast as 4 weeks until online publication (corrected proof/Article in Press) after acceptance and 14 weeks from acceptance until publication in a printed issue. The journal publishes novel papers that really contribute to understanding the biology and treatment of schizophrenic disorders; Schizophrenia Research brings together biological, clinical and psychological research in order to stimulate the synthesis of findings from all disciplines involved in improving patient outcomes in schizophrenia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信