Kazunori Tatsumi, Alexandra Parfitt, Lisa Weissfeld, Mark Opler
{"title":"在远程独立评分的背景下评估精神分裂症的阴性症状:对BNSS和PANSS的心理测量学评估","authors":"Kazunori Tatsumi, Alexandra Parfitt, Lisa Weissfeld, Mark Opler","doi":"10.1016/j.schres.2025.04.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous traditional psychometric validation studies have demonstrated that the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) have satisfactory psychometric properties in patients with schizophrenia. The objective of the current study is to expand this literature by evaluating the psychometric properties of both scales in a large, multicenter, multicultural, randomized control clinical trial in patients with schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms. The current study employs independent ratings, in which raters are blinded from the study protocol and administer both scales via videoconference. The BNSS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93). The results of discriminant and concurrent validity analyses supported the construct validity of the assessment. The exploratory factor analysis of the PANSS identified five distinct factors. Overall, BNSS and PANSS demonstrate good psychometric properties that are comparable to previous findings that were derived from traditional psychometric studies, typically conducted at a single site and utilizing face-to-face ratings. Our findings suggest that negative symptoms of schizophrenia can validly be measured using the BNSS and PANSS via remote methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21417,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research","volume":"281 ","pages":"Pages 108-114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing negative symptoms of schizophrenia in the context of remote independent ratings: a psychometric evaluation of BNSS and PANSS\",\"authors\":\"Kazunori Tatsumi, Alexandra Parfitt, Lisa Weissfeld, Mark Opler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.schres.2025.04.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Previous traditional psychometric validation studies have demonstrated that the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) have satisfactory psychometric properties in patients with schizophrenia. The objective of the current study is to expand this literature by evaluating the psychometric properties of both scales in a large, multicenter, multicultural, randomized control clinical trial in patients with schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms. The current study employs independent ratings, in which raters are blinded from the study protocol and administer both scales via videoconference. The BNSS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93). The results of discriminant and concurrent validity analyses supported the construct validity of the assessment. The exploratory factor analysis of the PANSS identified five distinct factors. Overall, BNSS and PANSS demonstrate good psychometric properties that are comparable to previous findings that were derived from traditional psychometric studies, typically conducted at a single site and utilizing face-to-face ratings. Our findings suggest that negative symptoms of schizophrenia can validly be measured using the BNSS and PANSS via remote methods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schizophrenia Research\",\"volume\":\"281 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 108-114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schizophrenia Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092099642500163X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092099642500163X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing negative symptoms of schizophrenia in the context of remote independent ratings: a psychometric evaluation of BNSS and PANSS
Previous traditional psychometric validation studies have demonstrated that the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) have satisfactory psychometric properties in patients with schizophrenia. The objective of the current study is to expand this literature by evaluating the psychometric properties of both scales in a large, multicenter, multicultural, randomized control clinical trial in patients with schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms. The current study employs independent ratings, in which raters are blinded from the study protocol and administer both scales via videoconference. The BNSS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93). The results of discriminant and concurrent validity analyses supported the construct validity of the assessment. The exploratory factor analysis of the PANSS identified five distinct factors. Overall, BNSS and PANSS demonstrate good psychometric properties that are comparable to previous findings that were derived from traditional psychometric studies, typically conducted at a single site and utilizing face-to-face ratings. Our findings suggest that negative symptoms of schizophrenia can validly be measured using the BNSS and PANSS via remote methods.
期刊介绍:
As official journal of the Schizophrenia International Research Society (SIRS) Schizophrenia Research is THE journal of choice for international researchers and clinicians to share their work with the global schizophrenia research community. More than 6000 institutes have online or print (or both) access to this journal - the largest specialist journal in the field, with the largest readership!
Schizophrenia Research''s time to first decision is as fast as 6 weeks and its publishing speed is as fast as 4 weeks until online publication (corrected proof/Article in Press) after acceptance and 14 weeks from acceptance until publication in a printed issue.
The journal publishes novel papers that really contribute to understanding the biology and treatment of schizophrenic disorders; Schizophrenia Research brings together biological, clinical and psychological research in order to stimulate the synthesis of findings from all disciplines involved in improving patient outcomes in schizophrenia.