{"title":"反过来的社会意义:基于说话人身份的英语角色名词使用期望","authors":"Benjamin Weissman","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Insights from pragmatics and sociolinguistics have informed theories of social meaning, inferences about a speaker's identity that a hearer draws based on utterance properties such as lexical choices. One example is the use of a gender-neutral role noun (<em>salesperson</em>) rather than a gender-marked form (<em>saleswoman/salesman</em>); choosing this form can serve as an index of a speaker's progressiveness (Papineau et al., 2022). This study investigates social meaning in reverse, exploring to what extent hearers expect speakers to use these role noun forms based on their beliefs about the speaker's beliefs. In two experiments, participants meet fictitious characters, introduced as having either a conservative or progressive ideology. Experiment 1 finds that participants predict gender-neutral forms at a significantly higher rate for progressive speakers than for conservative speakers, taken as evidence that a hearer's beliefs about a speaker motivate expectations related to markers of social meaning. Experiment 2 finds no significant reading time effects regarding the form of the noun and the ideology of the speaker, suggesting the pattern from Experiment 1 does not manifest in real-time language processing. Experiment 2 does find a significant hearer-speaker ideological alignment effect whereby participants who were ideologically aligned with the character read significantly faster than those who were not.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"242 ","pages":"Pages 141-155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social meaning in reverse: Expectations of English role noun use based on speaker identity\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Weissman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.04.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Insights from pragmatics and sociolinguistics have informed theories of social meaning, inferences about a speaker's identity that a hearer draws based on utterance properties such as lexical choices. One example is the use of a gender-neutral role noun (<em>salesperson</em>) rather than a gender-marked form (<em>saleswoman/salesman</em>); choosing this form can serve as an index of a speaker's progressiveness (Papineau et al., 2022). This study investigates social meaning in reverse, exploring to what extent hearers expect speakers to use these role noun forms based on their beliefs about the speaker's beliefs. In two experiments, participants meet fictitious characters, introduced as having either a conservative or progressive ideology. Experiment 1 finds that participants predict gender-neutral forms at a significantly higher rate for progressive speakers than for conservative speakers, taken as evidence that a hearer's beliefs about a speaker motivate expectations related to markers of social meaning. Experiment 2 finds no significant reading time effects regarding the form of the noun and the ideology of the speaker, suggesting the pattern from Experiment 1 does not manifest in real-time language processing. Experiment 2 does find a significant hearer-speaker ideological alignment effect whereby participants who were ideologically aligned with the character read significantly faster than those who were not.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pragmatics\",\"volume\":\"242 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 141-155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000918\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000918","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
来自语用学和社会语言学的见解为社会意义理论提供了信息,即听者根据话语特性(如词汇选择)对说话人身份的推断。一个例子是使用性别中立的角色名词(售货员),而不是带有性别标记的形式(女售货员/推销员);选择这种形式可以作为说话人进步性的指标(Papineau et al., 2022)。本研究反过来考察社会意义,探索听者基于对说话者信念的信念,期望说话者在多大程度上使用这些角色名词形式。在两个实验中,参与者遇到了虚构的人物,他们被介绍为具有保守或进步的意识形态。实验1发现,参与者对进步派说话者中性形式的预测率明显高于保守派说话者,这表明听者对说话者的信念激发了与社会意义标记相关的期望。实验2发现,名词的形式和说话人的意识形态对阅读时间没有显著影响,说明实验1的模式在实时语言加工中没有表现出来。实验2确实发现了一个显著的听者-说者意识形态一致性效应,即思想上与角色一致的参与者的阅读速度明显快于非思想上一致的参与者。
Social meaning in reverse: Expectations of English role noun use based on speaker identity
Insights from pragmatics and sociolinguistics have informed theories of social meaning, inferences about a speaker's identity that a hearer draws based on utterance properties such as lexical choices. One example is the use of a gender-neutral role noun (salesperson) rather than a gender-marked form (saleswoman/salesman); choosing this form can serve as an index of a speaker's progressiveness (Papineau et al., 2022). This study investigates social meaning in reverse, exploring to what extent hearers expect speakers to use these role noun forms based on their beliefs about the speaker's beliefs. In two experiments, participants meet fictitious characters, introduced as having either a conservative or progressive ideology. Experiment 1 finds that participants predict gender-neutral forms at a significantly higher rate for progressive speakers than for conservative speakers, taken as evidence that a hearer's beliefs about a speaker motivate expectations related to markers of social meaning. Experiment 2 finds no significant reading time effects regarding the form of the noun and the ideology of the speaker, suggesting the pattern from Experiment 1 does not manifest in real-time language processing. Experiment 2 does find a significant hearer-speaker ideological alignment effect whereby participants who were ideologically aligned with the character read significantly faster than those who were not.
期刊介绍:
Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.