{"title":"为什么多元化代表的进展如此缓慢?对比管理实践的普遍性与实现多样化代表性的有效性","authors":"Traci Sitzmann , Shoshana Schwartz","doi":"10.1016/j.bushor.2024.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While numerous management practices have been implemented in organizations in recent decades to create equitable and high-performing workforces, there has been little to no progress toward diversifying managerial representation during this timeframe. Our review contrasts the effectiveness of management practices for increasing diverse representation in management with how often these practices are utilized in organizations, centrally implicating ineffective management practices for the slow pace of change in diversifying managerial ranks. Specifically, we unveil that organizations predominantly implement ineffective and counterproductive practices that undermine managerial diversity while infrequently implementing practices that increase managerial diversity. For example, paid diversity roles, formal mentoring programs, and DEI-focused recruitment are among the most effective practices but are not consistently implemented in organizations. In contrast, diversity and harassment training and grievance procedures are frequently utilized in organizations but are negatively related to diverse representation. We also provide examples of organizations implementing multiple effective practices and making meaningful progress toward diversifying their workforces.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48347,"journal":{"name":"Business Horizons","volume":"68 3","pages":"Pages 263-276"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why is progress toward diverse representation so slow? Contrasting management practice prevalence versus effectiveness for achieving diverse representation\",\"authors\":\"Traci Sitzmann , Shoshana Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bushor.2024.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While numerous management practices have been implemented in organizations in recent decades to create equitable and high-performing workforces, there has been little to no progress toward diversifying managerial representation during this timeframe. Our review contrasts the effectiveness of management practices for increasing diverse representation in management with how often these practices are utilized in organizations, centrally implicating ineffective management practices for the slow pace of change in diversifying managerial ranks. Specifically, we unveil that organizations predominantly implement ineffective and counterproductive practices that undermine managerial diversity while infrequently implementing practices that increase managerial diversity. For example, paid diversity roles, formal mentoring programs, and DEI-focused recruitment are among the most effective practices but are not consistently implemented in organizations. In contrast, diversity and harassment training and grievance procedures are frequently utilized in organizations but are negatively related to diverse representation. We also provide examples of organizations implementing multiple effective practices and making meaningful progress toward diversifying their workforces.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Horizons\",\"volume\":\"68 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 263-276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Horizons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681324001782\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681324001782","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Why is progress toward diverse representation so slow? Contrasting management practice prevalence versus effectiveness for achieving diverse representation
While numerous management practices have been implemented in organizations in recent decades to create equitable and high-performing workforces, there has been little to no progress toward diversifying managerial representation during this timeframe. Our review contrasts the effectiveness of management practices for increasing diverse representation in management with how often these practices are utilized in organizations, centrally implicating ineffective management practices for the slow pace of change in diversifying managerial ranks. Specifically, we unveil that organizations predominantly implement ineffective and counterproductive practices that undermine managerial diversity while infrequently implementing practices that increase managerial diversity. For example, paid diversity roles, formal mentoring programs, and DEI-focused recruitment are among the most effective practices but are not consistently implemented in organizations. In contrast, diversity and harassment training and grievance procedures are frequently utilized in organizations but are negatively related to diverse representation. We also provide examples of organizations implementing multiple effective practices and making meaningful progress toward diversifying their workforces.
期刊介绍:
Business Horizons, the bimonthly journal of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University, is dedicated to publishing original articles that appeal to both business academics and practitioners. Our editorial focus is on covering a diverse array of topics within the broader field of business, with a particular emphasis on identifying critical business issues and proposing practical solutions. Our goal is to inspire readers to approach business practices from new and innovative perspectives. Business Horizons occupies a distinctive position among business publications by offering articles that strike a balance between academic rigor and practical relevance. As such, our articles are grounded in scholarly research yet presented in a clear and accessible format, making them relevant to a broad audience within the business community.