{"title":"在侧卫任务的大部分兼容块中,主动控制对中心区域的异常加工没有影响","authors":"Kota Suzuki","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2025.112580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Behind the proportion compatibility effects in the flanker task, processing in the central area was hypothesized to be enhanced by proactive control in the mostly incompatible (MI) blocks compared with the mostly compatible (MC) blocks. This study aimed to examine this hypothesis and focused on deviant processing in the central area. A total of 45 adults performed the flanker task, which included central-deviant stimuli. Proportion deviance was manipulated by rare (15 %) and equiprobable (50 %) conditions in the MC and MI blocks. The color of the central and surrounding arrows was different and the same between the central-deviant and typical stimuli, respectively. Thus, deviant processing in the central area was evaluated based on a comparison of event-related potentials for the central-deviant stimuli between the rare and equiprobable conditions. The N1 difference and visual mismatch negativity for the central-deviant stimuli did not significantly differ between the MI and MC blocks. These results suggested that proactive control in the MI blocks had no effects on deviant processing in the central area, which contradicted the hypothesis. In addition, N1 for both the central-deviant and typical stimuli was significantly reduced in the MI blocks compared with the MC blocks, suggesting that the total amount of processing was reduced in the MI blocks compared with the MC blocks. These findings suggest that proactive control in the MI blocks functions to inhibit processing in the surrounding area; however, it does not enhance processing in the central area.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54945,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 112580"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No effects of proactive control on deviant processing in the central area in mostly compatible blocks of the flanker task\",\"authors\":\"Kota Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2025.112580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Behind the proportion compatibility effects in the flanker task, processing in the central area was hypothesized to be enhanced by proactive control in the mostly incompatible (MI) blocks compared with the mostly compatible (MC) blocks. This study aimed to examine this hypothesis and focused on deviant processing in the central area. A total of 45 adults performed the flanker task, which included central-deviant stimuli. Proportion deviance was manipulated by rare (15 %) and equiprobable (50 %) conditions in the MC and MI blocks. The color of the central and surrounding arrows was different and the same between the central-deviant and typical stimuli, respectively. Thus, deviant processing in the central area was evaluated based on a comparison of event-related potentials for the central-deviant stimuli between the rare and equiprobable conditions. The N1 difference and visual mismatch negativity for the central-deviant stimuli did not significantly differ between the MI and MC blocks. These results suggested that proactive control in the MI blocks had no effects on deviant processing in the central area, which contradicted the hypothesis. In addition, N1 for both the central-deviant and typical stimuli was significantly reduced in the MI blocks compared with the MC blocks, suggesting that the total amount of processing was reduced in the MI blocks compared with the MC blocks. These findings suggest that proactive control in the MI blocks functions to inhibit processing in the surrounding area; however, it does not enhance processing in the central area.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Psychophysiology\",\"volume\":\"212 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112580\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Psychophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876025000765\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876025000765","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
No effects of proactive control on deviant processing in the central area in mostly compatible blocks of the flanker task
Behind the proportion compatibility effects in the flanker task, processing in the central area was hypothesized to be enhanced by proactive control in the mostly incompatible (MI) blocks compared with the mostly compatible (MC) blocks. This study aimed to examine this hypothesis and focused on deviant processing in the central area. A total of 45 adults performed the flanker task, which included central-deviant stimuli. Proportion deviance was manipulated by rare (15 %) and equiprobable (50 %) conditions in the MC and MI blocks. The color of the central and surrounding arrows was different and the same between the central-deviant and typical stimuli, respectively. Thus, deviant processing in the central area was evaluated based on a comparison of event-related potentials for the central-deviant stimuli between the rare and equiprobable conditions. The N1 difference and visual mismatch negativity for the central-deviant stimuli did not significantly differ between the MI and MC blocks. These results suggested that proactive control in the MI blocks had no effects on deviant processing in the central area, which contradicted the hypothesis. In addition, N1 for both the central-deviant and typical stimuli was significantly reduced in the MI blocks compared with the MC blocks, suggesting that the total amount of processing was reduced in the MI blocks compared with the MC blocks. These findings suggest that proactive control in the MI blocks functions to inhibit processing in the surrounding area; however, it does not enhance processing in the central area.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Psychophysiology is the official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, and provides a respected forum for the publication of high quality original contributions on all aspects of psychophysiology. The journal is interdisciplinary and aims to integrate the neurosciences and behavioral sciences. Empirical, theoretical, and review articles are encouraged in the following areas:
• Cerebral psychophysiology: including functional brain mapping and neuroimaging with Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Electroencephalographic studies.
• Autonomic functions: including bilateral electrodermal activity, pupillometry and blood volume changes.
• Cardiovascular Psychophysiology:including studies of blood pressure, cardiac functioning and respiration.
• Somatic psychophysiology: including muscle activity, eye movements and eye blinks.