Cas9和Cas12a内切酶在与RNA互补的区域切割含有核苷酸错配的DNA底物的关键热力学特征

IF 2.5 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Svetlana V. Baranova , Polina V. Zhdanova , Pavel E. Pestryakov , Alexander A. Chernonosov , Vladimir V. Koval
{"title":"Cas9和Cas12a内切酶在与RNA互补的区域切割含有核苷酸错配的DNA底物的关键热力学特征","authors":"Svetlana V. Baranova ,&nbsp;Polina V. Zhdanova ,&nbsp;Pavel E. Pestryakov ,&nbsp;Alexander A. Chernonosov ,&nbsp;Vladimir V. Koval","doi":"10.1016/j.bbrc.2025.151892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>CRISPR-Cas9 and CRISPR-Cas12a are endonuclease systems widely used for genome editing, but their mechanisms of DNA cleavage, particularly in the presence of nucleotide mismatches, remain incompletely understood. This study deals with thermodynamic parameters governing the cleavage of DNA substrates—containing a mismatch in the region complementary to RNA—by Cas9 and Cas12a. Using a series of 55 bp DNA substrates with various mismatches, we investigated the cleavage efficiency, reaction kinetics, and thermodynamic stability of the Cas12a–crRNA complex and compared it with Cas9–sgRNA on the same substrates. Cas12a manifested strict specificity, with a mismatch leading to a significant reduction in cleavage efficiency or to nonspecific <em>trans</em>-cleavage, whereas Cas9 showed higher tolerance to each mismatch, especially in internal and distal regions. Thermodynamic calculations indicated that Cas12a–crRNA complexes are generally stabler with fully complementary DNA but are more destabilized by a mismatch than Cas9–sgRNA complexes are. Molecular dynamics simulations revealed that a mismatch causes greater structural destabilization in Cas12a than in Cas9, correlating with reduced cleavage efficiency. These findings highlight distinct mechanisms of mismatch recognition by Cas9 and Cas12a, provide insights into their enzymatic behavior, and inform the design of more precise genome-editing tools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8779,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical and biophysical research communications","volume":"768 ","pages":"Article 151892"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key thermodynamic characteristics of Cas9 and Cas12a endonucleases’ cleavage of a DNA substrate containing a nucleotide mismatch in the region complementary to RNA\",\"authors\":\"Svetlana V. Baranova ,&nbsp;Polina V. Zhdanova ,&nbsp;Pavel E. Pestryakov ,&nbsp;Alexander A. Chernonosov ,&nbsp;Vladimir V. Koval\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bbrc.2025.151892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>CRISPR-Cas9 and CRISPR-Cas12a are endonuclease systems widely used for genome editing, but their mechanisms of DNA cleavage, particularly in the presence of nucleotide mismatches, remain incompletely understood. This study deals with thermodynamic parameters governing the cleavage of DNA substrates—containing a mismatch in the region complementary to RNA—by Cas9 and Cas12a. Using a series of 55 bp DNA substrates with various mismatches, we investigated the cleavage efficiency, reaction kinetics, and thermodynamic stability of the Cas12a–crRNA complex and compared it with Cas9–sgRNA on the same substrates. Cas12a manifested strict specificity, with a mismatch leading to a significant reduction in cleavage efficiency or to nonspecific <em>trans</em>-cleavage, whereas Cas9 showed higher tolerance to each mismatch, especially in internal and distal regions. Thermodynamic calculations indicated that Cas12a–crRNA complexes are generally stabler with fully complementary DNA but are more destabilized by a mismatch than Cas9–sgRNA complexes are. Molecular dynamics simulations revealed that a mismatch causes greater structural destabilization in Cas12a than in Cas9, correlating with reduced cleavage efficiency. These findings highlight distinct mechanisms of mismatch recognition by Cas9 and Cas12a, provide insights into their enzymatic behavior, and inform the design of more precise genome-editing tools.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biochemical and biophysical research communications\",\"volume\":\"768 \",\"pages\":\"Article 151892\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biochemical and biophysical research communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X25006060\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical and biophysical research communications","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X25006060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

CRISPR-Cas9和CRISPR-Cas12a是广泛用于基因组编辑的内切酶系统,但它们的DNA切割机制,特别是在核苷酸错配的情况下,仍然不完全清楚。本研究涉及控制Cas9和Cas12a切割DNA底物的热力学参数-包含与rna互补区域的不匹配-。利用一系列不同错配的55 bp DNA底物,研究了Cas12a-crRNA复合物的裂解效率、反应动力学和热力学稳定性,并将其与Cas9-sgRNA在相同底物上进行了比较。Cas12a表现出严格的特异性,错配会导致切割效率显著降低或非特异性反切,而Cas9对每次错配都表现出更高的耐受性,尤其是在内部和远端区域。热力学计算表明,与Cas9-sgRNA复合物相比,Cas12a-crRNA复合物在DNA完全互补时通常更稳定,但在错配时更不稳定。分子动力学模拟显示,与Cas9相比,错配导致Cas12a更大的结构不稳定,这与切割效率降低有关。这些发现突出了Cas9和Cas12a错配识别的不同机制,为它们的酶促行为提供了见解,并为更精确的基因组编辑工具的设计提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Key thermodynamic characteristics of Cas9 and Cas12a endonucleases’ cleavage of a DNA substrate containing a nucleotide mismatch in the region complementary to RNA
CRISPR-Cas9 and CRISPR-Cas12a are endonuclease systems widely used for genome editing, but their mechanisms of DNA cleavage, particularly in the presence of nucleotide mismatches, remain incompletely understood. This study deals with thermodynamic parameters governing the cleavage of DNA substrates—containing a mismatch in the region complementary to RNA—by Cas9 and Cas12a. Using a series of 55 bp DNA substrates with various mismatches, we investigated the cleavage efficiency, reaction kinetics, and thermodynamic stability of the Cas12a–crRNA complex and compared it with Cas9–sgRNA on the same substrates. Cas12a manifested strict specificity, with a mismatch leading to a significant reduction in cleavage efficiency or to nonspecific trans-cleavage, whereas Cas9 showed higher tolerance to each mismatch, especially in internal and distal regions. Thermodynamic calculations indicated that Cas12a–crRNA complexes are generally stabler with fully complementary DNA but are more destabilized by a mismatch than Cas9–sgRNA complexes are. Molecular dynamics simulations revealed that a mismatch causes greater structural destabilization in Cas12a than in Cas9, correlating with reduced cleavage efficiency. These findings highlight distinct mechanisms of mismatch recognition by Cas9 and Cas12a, provide insights into their enzymatic behavior, and inform the design of more precise genome-editing tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biochemical and biophysical research communications
Biochemical and biophysical research communications 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1400
审稿时长
14 days
期刊介绍: Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications is the premier international journal devoted to the very rapid dissemination of timely and significant experimental results in diverse fields of biological research. The development of the "Breakthroughs and Views" section brings the minireview format to the journal, and issues often contain collections of special interest manuscripts. BBRC is published weekly (52 issues/year).Research Areas now include: Biochemistry; biophysics; cell biology; developmental biology; immunology ; molecular biology; neurobiology; plant biology and proteomics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信