基于遥感数据的辐射传输模型(RTM)在陆地生物群系生物物理生化特性检索中的应用综述

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Bongokuhle S’phesihle Sibiya , John Odindi , Onisimo Mutanga , Moses Azong Cho , Cecilia Masemola
{"title":"基于遥感数据的辐射传输模型(RTM)在陆地生物群系生物物理生化特性检索中的应用综述","authors":"Bongokuhle S’phesihle Sibiya ,&nbsp;John Odindi ,&nbsp;Onisimo Mutanga ,&nbsp;Moses Azong Cho ,&nbsp;Cecilia Masemola","doi":"10.1016/j.asr.2025.02.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the past few decades, there has been significant recognition of the value of Radiative Transfer Models (RTMs) for ecological remote sensing applications. This has led to various studies aimed at utilizing RTM techniques to quantify and map a range of biophysical and biochemical properties at different scales. Most literature reviews have predominantly focused on 1D models, such as PROSAIL, overlooking the more robust 3D models. This paper provides a detailed systematic review on the progress, gaps, and opportunities associated with both 1D and 3D RTM models in the context of remote sensing of terrestrial biomes. The review reveals a skewed distribution of research efforts between the Global North and South, with a significant concentration of studies conducted in the United States, China, and Germany, while fewer investigations have been conducted in Africa. Furthermore, most studies have primarily utilized MODIS and Landsat sensors, focusing on plant attributes such as Leaf Area Index (LAI) and chlorophyll content. These studies have been predominantly conducted in grassland and forest landscapes. Overall, the findings indicate that PROSPECT and PROSAIL have been the most popular models over the past two decades. In the realm of 3D models, the Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer (DART) and Forest Light Interaction Model (FLIGHT) models have been the most popular. These models have been primarily utilized through the look-up table (LUT) method, followed by the hybrid approach combining machine learning and RTMs. Understanding both 1D and 3D models offers an opportunity to assess the current state of research and identify future opportunities in the application of radiative transfer modeling for ecological remote sensing. By addressing the existing gaps and leveraging advancements in modeling techniques, researchers can enhance the accuracy and applicability of remote sensing on various ecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50850,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Space Research","volume":"75 10","pages":"Pages 7424-7444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The utility of radiative transfer models (RTM) on remotely sensed data in retrieving biophysical and biochemical properties of terrestrial biomes: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Bongokuhle S’phesihle Sibiya ,&nbsp;John Odindi ,&nbsp;Onisimo Mutanga ,&nbsp;Moses Azong Cho ,&nbsp;Cecilia Masemola\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asr.2025.02.052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Over the past few decades, there has been significant recognition of the value of Radiative Transfer Models (RTMs) for ecological remote sensing applications. This has led to various studies aimed at utilizing RTM techniques to quantify and map a range of biophysical and biochemical properties at different scales. Most literature reviews have predominantly focused on 1D models, such as PROSAIL, overlooking the more robust 3D models. This paper provides a detailed systematic review on the progress, gaps, and opportunities associated with both 1D and 3D RTM models in the context of remote sensing of terrestrial biomes. The review reveals a skewed distribution of research efforts between the Global North and South, with a significant concentration of studies conducted in the United States, China, and Germany, while fewer investigations have been conducted in Africa. Furthermore, most studies have primarily utilized MODIS and Landsat sensors, focusing on plant attributes such as Leaf Area Index (LAI) and chlorophyll content. These studies have been predominantly conducted in grassland and forest landscapes. Overall, the findings indicate that PROSPECT and PROSAIL have been the most popular models over the past two decades. In the realm of 3D models, the Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer (DART) and Forest Light Interaction Model (FLIGHT) models have been the most popular. These models have been primarily utilized through the look-up table (LUT) method, followed by the hybrid approach combining machine learning and RTMs. Understanding both 1D and 3D models offers an opportunity to assess the current state of research and identify future opportunities in the application of radiative transfer modeling for ecological remote sensing. By addressing the existing gaps and leveraging advancements in modeling techniques, researchers can enhance the accuracy and applicability of remote sensing on various ecosystems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Space Research\",\"volume\":\"75 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 7424-7444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Space Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117725001875\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Space Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117725001875","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几十年里,辐射传输模型(RTMs)在生态遥感应用中的价值得到了广泛的认识。这导致了各种旨在利用RTM技术在不同尺度上量化和绘制一系列生物物理和生化特性的研究。大多数文献综述主要集中在一维模型上,如PROSAIL,而忽略了更强大的3D模型。本文对陆地生物群落遥感背景下1D和3D RTM模型的进展、差距和机遇进行了详细的系统综述。该综述揭示了全球北方和南方之间的研究工作分布不均,主要集中在美国、中国和德国进行的研究,而在非洲进行的调查较少。此外,大多数研究主要利用MODIS和Landsat传感器,关注叶面积指数(Leaf Area Index, LAI)和叶绿素含量等植物属性。这些研究主要是在草原和森林景观中进行的。总的来说,研究结果表明,PROSPECT和PROSAIL是过去二十年中最受欢迎的模型。在三维模型领域,离散各向异性辐射传输(DART)模型和森林光相互作用模型(FLIGHT)模型是目前最流行的模型。这些模型主要通过查找表(LUT)方法来利用,其次是机器学习和rtm相结合的混合方法。了解1D和3D模型为评估研究现状和确定生态遥感辐射传输模型应用的未来机会提供了机会。通过解决现有的差距和利用先进的建模技术,研究人员可以提高遥感在各种生态系统上的准确性和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The utility of radiative transfer models (RTM) on remotely sensed data in retrieving biophysical and biochemical properties of terrestrial biomes: A systematic review
Over the past few decades, there has been significant recognition of the value of Radiative Transfer Models (RTMs) for ecological remote sensing applications. This has led to various studies aimed at utilizing RTM techniques to quantify and map a range of biophysical and biochemical properties at different scales. Most literature reviews have predominantly focused on 1D models, such as PROSAIL, overlooking the more robust 3D models. This paper provides a detailed systematic review on the progress, gaps, and opportunities associated with both 1D and 3D RTM models in the context of remote sensing of terrestrial biomes. The review reveals a skewed distribution of research efforts between the Global North and South, with a significant concentration of studies conducted in the United States, China, and Germany, while fewer investigations have been conducted in Africa. Furthermore, most studies have primarily utilized MODIS and Landsat sensors, focusing on plant attributes such as Leaf Area Index (LAI) and chlorophyll content. These studies have been predominantly conducted in grassland and forest landscapes. Overall, the findings indicate that PROSPECT and PROSAIL have been the most popular models over the past two decades. In the realm of 3D models, the Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer (DART) and Forest Light Interaction Model (FLIGHT) models have been the most popular. These models have been primarily utilized through the look-up table (LUT) method, followed by the hybrid approach combining machine learning and RTMs. Understanding both 1D and 3D models offers an opportunity to assess the current state of research and identify future opportunities in the application of radiative transfer modeling for ecological remote sensing. By addressing the existing gaps and leveraging advancements in modeling techniques, researchers can enhance the accuracy and applicability of remote sensing on various ecosystems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Space Research
Advances in Space Research 地学天文-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
800
审稿时长
5.8 months
期刊介绍: The COSPAR publication Advances in Space Research (ASR) is an open journal covering all areas of space research including: space studies of the Earth''s surface, meteorology, climate, the Earth-Moon system, planets and small bodies of the solar system, upper atmospheres, ionospheres and magnetospheres of the Earth and planets including reference atmospheres, space plasmas in the solar system, astrophysics from space, materials sciences in space, fundamental physics in space, space debris, space weather, Earth observations of space phenomena, etc. NB: Please note that manuscripts related to life sciences as related to space are no more accepted for submission to Advances in Space Research. Such manuscripts should now be submitted to the new COSPAR Journal Life Sciences in Space Research (LSSR). All submissions are reviewed by two scientists in the field. COSPAR is an interdisciplinary scientific organization concerned with the progress of space research on an international scale. Operating under the rules of ICSU, COSPAR ignores political considerations and considers all questions solely from the scientific viewpoint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信