实验室大鼠空间导航认知表现的一致性及其与活动和大胆度的联系

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Veronika Rudolfová , Eliška Antošová , Tomáš Petrásek , Karel Valeš , Eva Landová , Daniel Frynta , Tereza Nekovářová
{"title":"实验室大鼠空间导航认知表现的一致性及其与活动和大胆度的联系","authors":"Veronika Rudolfová ,&nbsp;Eliška Antošová ,&nbsp;Tomáš Petrásek ,&nbsp;Karel Valeš ,&nbsp;Eva Landová ,&nbsp;Daniel Frynta ,&nbsp;Tereza Nekovářová","doi":"10.1016/j.beproc.2025.105205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Even though cognitive testing in animals is widespread, many issues remain open – for example the influence of behavioural parameters on cognitive performance, stability of cognitive performance upon repeated testing, or comparability of cognitive variables across different tasks (i.e. cross-contextual consistency). In this study we tested thirty six male Long Evans laboratory rats and assessed their cognitive performance in two standard tasks of spatial navigation – Active allothetic place avoidance and Morris water maze test. Using multivariate analyses, we detected different aspects of cognition within these complex tasks (the ability to learn fast, cognitive flexibility, general ability to solve a task successfully). We found that consistency of cognitive performance in these two tasks (estimates of cognitive repeatability) differed substantially, reflecting differences in the experimental procedures. Moreover, we inspected cognitive performance of the animals in more detail by creating a correlation matrix of factors derived from these procedures. Nevertheless, we found no correlation and therefore no indication of a general cognitive ability in spatial navigation using these two tasks. In addition, we found no link between personality and cognition when correlating cognitive performance of the animals with parameters from personality tests, which were derived from a previous study conducted on the same animals. These findings highlight a task-dependent nature of cognitive performance in these two tasks of spatial navigation and suggest that general cognitive ability in spatial navigation may not be reliably inferred from these two tasks, while also indicating no evident link between cognition and personality in this context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8746,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Processes","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 105205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consistency of cognitive performance in spatial navigation and its link to activity and boldness in laboratory rats\",\"authors\":\"Veronika Rudolfová ,&nbsp;Eliška Antošová ,&nbsp;Tomáš Petrásek ,&nbsp;Karel Valeš ,&nbsp;Eva Landová ,&nbsp;Daniel Frynta ,&nbsp;Tereza Nekovářová\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.beproc.2025.105205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Even though cognitive testing in animals is widespread, many issues remain open – for example the influence of behavioural parameters on cognitive performance, stability of cognitive performance upon repeated testing, or comparability of cognitive variables across different tasks (i.e. cross-contextual consistency). In this study we tested thirty six male Long Evans laboratory rats and assessed their cognitive performance in two standard tasks of spatial navigation – Active allothetic place avoidance and Morris water maze test. Using multivariate analyses, we detected different aspects of cognition within these complex tasks (the ability to learn fast, cognitive flexibility, general ability to solve a task successfully). We found that consistency of cognitive performance in these two tasks (estimates of cognitive repeatability) differed substantially, reflecting differences in the experimental procedures. Moreover, we inspected cognitive performance of the animals in more detail by creating a correlation matrix of factors derived from these procedures. Nevertheless, we found no correlation and therefore no indication of a general cognitive ability in spatial navigation using these two tasks. In addition, we found no link between personality and cognition when correlating cognitive performance of the animals with parameters from personality tests, which were derived from a previous study conducted on the same animals. These findings highlight a task-dependent nature of cognitive performance in these two tasks of spatial navigation and suggest that general cognitive ability in spatial navigation may not be reliably inferred from these two tasks, while also indicating no evident link between cognition and personality in this context.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural Processes\",\"volume\":\"228 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635725000671\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Processes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635725000671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在动物身上进行认知测试已经很普遍,但仍有许多问题有待解决,例如行为参数对认知表现的影响,重复测试后认知表现的稳定性,或不同任务中认知变量的可比性(即跨上下文一致性)。在本研究中,我们测试了36只雄性朗埃文斯实验室大鼠,并评估了它们在两个标准的空间导航任务中的认知表现——主动异体位置回避和莫里斯水迷宫测试。通过多变量分析,我们发现了这些复杂任务中认知的不同方面(快速学习的能力、认知灵活性、成功解决任务的一般能力)。我们发现,在这两个任务中的认知表现的一致性(认知可重复性的估计)有很大的不同,反映了实验程序的差异。此外,我们通过创建源自这些程序的因素的相关矩阵,更详细地检查了动物的认知表现。然而,我们没有发现相关性,因此没有迹象表明使用这两个任务的空间导航的一般认知能力。此外,当将动物的认知表现与性格测试的参数相关联时,我们发现性格和认知之间没有联系,这些参数来自先前对同一动物进行的研究。这些发现强调了这两项空间导航任务的认知表现的任务依赖性质,并表明空间导航的一般认知能力可能无法从这两项任务中可靠地推断出来,同时也表明在这一背景下,认知和人格之间没有明显的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consistency of cognitive performance in spatial navigation and its link to activity and boldness in laboratory rats
Even though cognitive testing in animals is widespread, many issues remain open – for example the influence of behavioural parameters on cognitive performance, stability of cognitive performance upon repeated testing, or comparability of cognitive variables across different tasks (i.e. cross-contextual consistency). In this study we tested thirty six male Long Evans laboratory rats and assessed their cognitive performance in two standard tasks of spatial navigation – Active allothetic place avoidance and Morris water maze test. Using multivariate analyses, we detected different aspects of cognition within these complex tasks (the ability to learn fast, cognitive flexibility, general ability to solve a task successfully). We found that consistency of cognitive performance in these two tasks (estimates of cognitive repeatability) differed substantially, reflecting differences in the experimental procedures. Moreover, we inspected cognitive performance of the animals in more detail by creating a correlation matrix of factors derived from these procedures. Nevertheless, we found no correlation and therefore no indication of a general cognitive ability in spatial navigation using these two tasks. In addition, we found no link between personality and cognition when correlating cognitive performance of the animals with parameters from personality tests, which were derived from a previous study conducted on the same animals. These findings highlight a task-dependent nature of cognitive performance in these two tasks of spatial navigation and suggest that general cognitive ability in spatial navigation may not be reliably inferred from these two tasks, while also indicating no evident link between cognition and personality in this context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Processes
Behavioural Processes 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Processes is dedicated to the publication of high-quality original research on animal behaviour from any theoretical perspective. It welcomes contributions that consider animal behaviour from behavioural analytic, cognitive, ethological, ecological and evolutionary points of view. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, and papers that integrate theory and methodology across disciplines are particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信