通往可持续能源未来的道路:德克萨斯州四个城市的比较案例研究

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Ju-Ying Yang
{"title":"通往可持续能源未来的道路:德克萨斯州四个城市的比较案例研究","authors":"Ju-Ying Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy transitions do not follow a single pathway as commonly assumed. This paper incorporates path dependence and policy learning literature to unpack different energy transition pathways. This paper examines why municipalities transition to renewable energy differently and identifies contributing factors. Through a comparative case study of four Texas municipalities—Georgetown, Denton, Austin, and Houston—two distinct pathways emerge. The first, <em>a Single Pathway with Feedback Loop</em>, shows that while municipalities can transition smoothly through critical junctures or shocks, they often struggle to maintain their commitments due to poor contract risk management. The second, a <em>Double Pathway with Policy Learning and Infrastructural Lock-in</em>, involves municipalities learning from others’ experiences to avoid mistakes, yet they may still face challenges due to reliance on existing fossil fuel infrastructure. This paper presents an updated theoretical energy transitions framework, highlighting the varied themes of these pathways. The conclusion draws attention to the practical implications for municipalities, particularly in terms of policy learning from past failures and avoiding carbon lock-in during energy transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 114663"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pathways to a sustainable energy future: A comparative case study of four Texas municipalities\",\"authors\":\"Ju-Ying Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Energy transitions do not follow a single pathway as commonly assumed. This paper incorporates path dependence and policy learning literature to unpack different energy transition pathways. This paper examines why municipalities transition to renewable energy differently and identifies contributing factors. Through a comparative case study of four Texas municipalities—Georgetown, Denton, Austin, and Houston—two distinct pathways emerge. The first, <em>a Single Pathway with Feedback Loop</em>, shows that while municipalities can transition smoothly through critical junctures or shocks, they often struggle to maintain their commitments due to poor contract risk management. The second, a <em>Double Pathway with Policy Learning and Infrastructural Lock-in</em>, involves municipalities learning from others’ experiences to avoid mistakes, yet they may still face challenges due to reliance on existing fossil fuel infrastructure. This paper presents an updated theoretical energy transitions framework, highlighting the varied themes of these pathways. The conclusion draws attention to the practical implications for municipalities, particularly in terms of policy learning from past failures and avoiding carbon lock-in during energy transitions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"204 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114663\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525001703\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525001703","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能量转换并不像通常认为的那样遵循单一途径。本文结合路径依赖和政策学习的相关文献,对不同的能源转换路径进行分析。本文探讨了为什么城市以不同的方式过渡到可再生能源,并确定了促成因素。通过对德克萨斯州四个城市——乔治城、丹顿、奥斯汀和休斯顿——的比较案例研究,我们发现了两条截然不同的路径。第一个是带有反馈回路的单一路径,它表明,尽管市政当局可以在关键时刻或冲击中顺利过渡,但由于合同风险管理不善,它们往往难以履行承诺。第二种是“政策学习和基础设施锁定的双重路径”,要求市政当局学习其他国家的经验以避免错误,但由于依赖现有的化石燃料基础设施,它们仍可能面临挑战。本文提出了一个更新的理论能量转换框架,突出了这些途径的不同主题。该结论提请注意对市政当局的实际影响,特别是在从过去的失败中学习政策和避免能源转型期间的碳锁定方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pathways to a sustainable energy future: A comparative case study of four Texas municipalities
Energy transitions do not follow a single pathway as commonly assumed. This paper incorporates path dependence and policy learning literature to unpack different energy transition pathways. This paper examines why municipalities transition to renewable energy differently and identifies contributing factors. Through a comparative case study of four Texas municipalities—Georgetown, Denton, Austin, and Houston—two distinct pathways emerge. The first, a Single Pathway with Feedback Loop, shows that while municipalities can transition smoothly through critical junctures or shocks, they often struggle to maintain their commitments due to poor contract risk management. The second, a Double Pathway with Policy Learning and Infrastructural Lock-in, involves municipalities learning from others’ experiences to avoid mistakes, yet they may still face challenges due to reliance on existing fossil fuel infrastructure. This paper presents an updated theoretical energy transitions framework, highlighting the varied themes of these pathways. The conclusion draws attention to the practical implications for municipalities, particularly in terms of policy learning from past failures and avoiding carbon lock-in during energy transitions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信