Sara J. Singer , Jeffrey Pfeffer , Margaret C. Nikolov
{"title":"缺乏问责制:雇主未能衡量和管理员工健康福利管理的证据","authors":"Sara J. Singer , Jeffrey Pfeffer , Margaret C. Nikolov","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Because employers provide health benefits to >50 % of the working age U.S. population, benefits managers at companies who purchase and potentially oversee design and delivery of health benefits have an important role in affecting healthcare delivery. We sought to assess how companies measure and manage health benefits, because these dimensions of accountability affect the performance of the health ecosystem. We randomly sampled companies and obtained data from >200 people knowledgeable about health benefits administration in their organizations. Our novel survey comprehensively inquired about what data concerning health benefits operations companies collected and who, if anyone, was responsible for aspects of employee benefits experience and outcomes. We found a surprisingly small amount of accountability for employer-provided health benefits. For instance, 39 % of companies <em>never</em> requested any feedback from their employees about their health benefits, just 6 % assessed the time employees spent getting questions about their health benefits answered, and <5 % of companies measured how often employees postponed filling a prescription or seeing a doctor because of cost. Moreover, there was a widespread absence of accountability for the performance of health plans. On average, 64 % of 15 health benefits performance dimensions were managed by <em>no one,</em> and more than half of respondents reported that no one in their organizations was held accountable for either the physical (64 %) or emotional (59 %) wellbeing of the workforce. Companies mostly provide minimal oversight of the health plans they provide to their employees. This lack of accountability is inconsistent with employers’ responsibilities to effectively manage the benefits they provide and almost certainly contributes to the well-documented problems of employee dissatisfaction with third party health benefits administrators and the frustration and wasted time spent accessing care and reimbursement that occasionally results in care delayed or denied, with consequences for both behavioral and physical health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"377 ","pages":"Article 118131"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An absence of accountability: Evidence of employers’ failure to measure and manage employee health benefits administration\",\"authors\":\"Sara J. Singer , Jeffrey Pfeffer , Margaret C. Nikolov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Because employers provide health benefits to >50 % of the working age U.S. population, benefits managers at companies who purchase and potentially oversee design and delivery of health benefits have an important role in affecting healthcare delivery. We sought to assess how companies measure and manage health benefits, because these dimensions of accountability affect the performance of the health ecosystem. We randomly sampled companies and obtained data from >200 people knowledgeable about health benefits administration in their organizations. Our novel survey comprehensively inquired about what data concerning health benefits operations companies collected and who, if anyone, was responsible for aspects of employee benefits experience and outcomes. We found a surprisingly small amount of accountability for employer-provided health benefits. For instance, 39 % of companies <em>never</em> requested any feedback from their employees about their health benefits, just 6 % assessed the time employees spent getting questions about their health benefits answered, and <5 % of companies measured how often employees postponed filling a prescription or seeing a doctor because of cost. Moreover, there was a widespread absence of accountability for the performance of health plans. On average, 64 % of 15 health benefits performance dimensions were managed by <em>no one,</em> and more than half of respondents reported that no one in their organizations was held accountable for either the physical (64 %) or emotional (59 %) wellbeing of the workforce. Companies mostly provide minimal oversight of the health plans they provide to their employees. This lack of accountability is inconsistent with employers’ responsibilities to effectively manage the benefits they provide and almost certainly contributes to the well-documented problems of employee dissatisfaction with third party health benefits administrators and the frustration and wasted time spent accessing care and reimbursement that occasionally results in care delayed or denied, with consequences for both behavioral and physical health.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"377 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004617\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004617","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
An absence of accountability: Evidence of employers’ failure to measure and manage employee health benefits administration
Because employers provide health benefits to >50 % of the working age U.S. population, benefits managers at companies who purchase and potentially oversee design and delivery of health benefits have an important role in affecting healthcare delivery. We sought to assess how companies measure and manage health benefits, because these dimensions of accountability affect the performance of the health ecosystem. We randomly sampled companies and obtained data from >200 people knowledgeable about health benefits administration in their organizations. Our novel survey comprehensively inquired about what data concerning health benefits operations companies collected and who, if anyone, was responsible for aspects of employee benefits experience and outcomes. We found a surprisingly small amount of accountability for employer-provided health benefits. For instance, 39 % of companies never requested any feedback from their employees about their health benefits, just 6 % assessed the time employees spent getting questions about their health benefits answered, and <5 % of companies measured how often employees postponed filling a prescription or seeing a doctor because of cost. Moreover, there was a widespread absence of accountability for the performance of health plans. On average, 64 % of 15 health benefits performance dimensions were managed by no one, and more than half of respondents reported that no one in their organizations was held accountable for either the physical (64 %) or emotional (59 %) wellbeing of the workforce. Companies mostly provide minimal oversight of the health plans they provide to their employees. This lack of accountability is inconsistent with employers’ responsibilities to effectively manage the benefits they provide and almost certainly contributes to the well-documented problems of employee dissatisfaction with third party health benefits administrators and the frustration and wasted time spent accessing care and reimbursement that occasionally results in care delayed or denied, with consequences for both behavioral and physical health.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.