核石墨的非弹性和断裂行为

IF 7.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
K. Irman , E.A. Flores-Johnson , J.J. Kruzic , W.E. Windes , T.J. Marrow , O. Muránsky
{"title":"核石墨的非弹性和断裂行为","authors":"K. Irman ,&nbsp;E.A. Flores-Johnson ,&nbsp;J.J. Kruzic ,&nbsp;W.E. Windes ,&nbsp;T.J. Marrow ,&nbsp;O. Muránsky","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding nuclear graphite's inelastic and fracture behaviour is essential for current and future reactor technologies using graphite-based engineering components. This study compares the behaviour of three nuclear graphite grades, fine-grained IG-110, coarse-grained NBG-18 and medium-grained PCEA, subjected to the uniaxial compression (UC) and the splitting tensile (ST) tests. It was found that the IG-110 graphite has a more favourable combination of ultimate strength and ductility when compared to the NBG-18 and PCEA grades containing large pores acting as strain concentrators. The formation of shear cracks was the primary failure mode under compression, while the formation of a main tension crack in the middle of the specimen was the primary failure mode during the ST test. The inelastic and fracture response was modelled using finite element simulations employing the concrete damaged plasticity (CDP) material model with the dilation angle parameter value selected by two different optimisation processes; a decoupled optimisation was run on the UC and ST models separately, and a coupled optimisation was performed on the UC and ST models running simultaneously. The best predictions were obtained when the value from the coupled optimisation was used. The results showed that the CDP model accurately describes the inelastic behaviour and peak force of all graphite grades and could also capture the failure modes observed experimentally in both UC and ST tests. In particular, the numerical model could capture the crack initiation and propagation path observed in the ST test reasonably well for the IG-110 and PCEA graphite grades.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mechanical Sciences","volume":"296 ","pages":"Article 110339"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inelastic and fracture behaviour of nuclear graphite\",\"authors\":\"K. Irman ,&nbsp;E.A. Flores-Johnson ,&nbsp;J.J. Kruzic ,&nbsp;W.E. Windes ,&nbsp;T.J. Marrow ,&nbsp;O. Muránsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Understanding nuclear graphite's inelastic and fracture behaviour is essential for current and future reactor technologies using graphite-based engineering components. This study compares the behaviour of three nuclear graphite grades, fine-grained IG-110, coarse-grained NBG-18 and medium-grained PCEA, subjected to the uniaxial compression (UC) and the splitting tensile (ST) tests. It was found that the IG-110 graphite has a more favourable combination of ultimate strength and ductility when compared to the NBG-18 and PCEA grades containing large pores acting as strain concentrators. The formation of shear cracks was the primary failure mode under compression, while the formation of a main tension crack in the middle of the specimen was the primary failure mode during the ST test. The inelastic and fracture response was modelled using finite element simulations employing the concrete damaged plasticity (CDP) material model with the dilation angle parameter value selected by two different optimisation processes; a decoupled optimisation was run on the UC and ST models separately, and a coupled optimisation was performed on the UC and ST models running simultaneously. The best predictions were obtained when the value from the coupled optimisation was used. The results showed that the CDP model accurately describes the inelastic behaviour and peak force of all graphite grades and could also capture the failure modes observed experimentally in both UC and ST tests. In particular, the numerical model could capture the crack initiation and propagation path observed in the ST test reasonably well for the IG-110 and PCEA graphite grades.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mechanical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"296 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mechanical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020740325004254\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mechanical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020740325004254","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解核石墨的非弹性和断裂行为对于当前和未来使用石墨基工程部件的反应堆技术至关重要。本研究比较了细晶IG-110、粗晶NBG-18和中晶PCEA三种核石墨等级在单轴压缩(UC)和劈裂拉伸(ST)试验下的性能。结果表明,与含有大孔隙作为应变集中剂的NBG-18和PCEA相比,IG-110石墨具有更好的极限强度和延展性。在压缩作用下,剪切裂纹的形成是主要破坏模式,而在ST试验中,试样中部形成主拉伸裂纹是主要破坏模式。采用混凝土损伤塑性(CDP)材料模型,采用两种不同优化过程选择的膨胀角参数值,对混凝土的非弹性和断裂响应进行有限元模拟;分别对UC和ST模型进行解耦优化,同时对UC和ST模型进行耦合优化。当使用耦合优化的值时,得到了最好的预测结果。结果表明,CDP模型准确地描述了所有石墨等级的非弹性行为和峰值力,并且可以捕获在UC和ST试验中观察到的实验破坏模式。特别是对于IG-110和PCEA石墨等级,该数值模型能够较好地捕捉到ST试验中观察到的裂纹萌生和扩展路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Inelastic and fracture behaviour of nuclear graphite

Inelastic and fracture behaviour of nuclear graphite
Understanding nuclear graphite's inelastic and fracture behaviour is essential for current and future reactor technologies using graphite-based engineering components. This study compares the behaviour of three nuclear graphite grades, fine-grained IG-110, coarse-grained NBG-18 and medium-grained PCEA, subjected to the uniaxial compression (UC) and the splitting tensile (ST) tests. It was found that the IG-110 graphite has a more favourable combination of ultimate strength and ductility when compared to the NBG-18 and PCEA grades containing large pores acting as strain concentrators. The formation of shear cracks was the primary failure mode under compression, while the formation of a main tension crack in the middle of the specimen was the primary failure mode during the ST test. The inelastic and fracture response was modelled using finite element simulations employing the concrete damaged plasticity (CDP) material model with the dilation angle parameter value selected by two different optimisation processes; a decoupled optimisation was run on the UC and ST models separately, and a coupled optimisation was performed on the UC and ST models running simultaneously. The best predictions were obtained when the value from the coupled optimisation was used. The results showed that the CDP model accurately describes the inelastic behaviour and peak force of all graphite grades and could also capture the failure modes observed experimentally in both UC and ST tests. In particular, the numerical model could capture the crack initiation and propagation path observed in the ST test reasonably well for the IG-110 and PCEA graphite grades.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
17.80%
发文量
769
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mechanical Sciences (IJMS) serves as a global platform for the publication and dissemination of original research that contributes to a deeper scientific understanding of the fundamental disciplines within mechanical, civil, and material engineering. The primary focus of IJMS is to showcase innovative and ground-breaking work that utilizes analytical and computational modeling techniques, such as Finite Element Method (FEM), Boundary Element Method (BEM), and mesh-free methods, among others. These modeling methods are applied to diverse fields including rigid-body mechanics (e.g., dynamics, vibration, stability), structural mechanics, metal forming, advanced materials (e.g., metals, composites, cellular, smart) behavior and applications, impact mechanics, strain localization, and other nonlinear effects (e.g., large deflections, plasticity, fracture). Additionally, IJMS covers the realms of fluid mechanics (both external and internal flows), tribology, thermodynamics, and materials processing. These subjects collectively form the core of the journal's content. In summary, IJMS provides a prestigious platform for researchers to present their original contributions, shedding light on analytical and computational modeling methods in various areas of mechanical engineering, as well as exploring the behavior and application of advanced materials, fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, and materials processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信