为社会利益设计社交媒体内容推荐算法

IF 4.1 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Jana Lasser, Nikolaus Poechhacker
{"title":"为社会利益设计社交媒体内容推荐算法","authors":"Jana Lasser, Nikolaus Poechhacker","doi":"10.1111/nyas.15359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the face of mounting evidence for a relationship between social media platforms and detrimental societal outcomes such as polarization, the erosion of trust in institutions, and the spread of misinformation, this perspective argues for the design of alternative content recommendation algorithms that serve the societal good and a lively democratic discourse. We propose to approach the design of content recommendation algorithms through the lens of fostering a healthy civic discourse, which serves to identify dimensions of relevance to guide the development of content recommendation algorithms. This approach lends alternative content recommendation algorithms legitimacy by being rooted in the EU's novel Digital Services Act and by aligning content recommendation with democratic values. We explore the trade‐off between interventions in content recommendation and freedom of expression and propose a research agenda that uses approaches from multistakeholder metric construction and scenario‐based risk assessment to find situation‐dependent just balances between individual rights and societal outcomes.","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing social media content recommendation algorithms for societal good\",\"authors\":\"Jana Lasser, Nikolaus Poechhacker\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nyas.15359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the face of mounting evidence for a relationship between social media platforms and detrimental societal outcomes such as polarization, the erosion of trust in institutions, and the spread of misinformation, this perspective argues for the design of alternative content recommendation algorithms that serve the societal good and a lively democratic discourse. We propose to approach the design of content recommendation algorithms through the lens of fostering a healthy civic discourse, which serves to identify dimensions of relevance to guide the development of content recommendation algorithms. This approach lends alternative content recommendation algorithms legitimacy by being rooted in the EU's novel Digital Services Act and by aligning content recommendation with democratic values. We explore the trade‐off between interventions in content recommendation and freedom of expression and propose a research agenda that uses approaches from multistakeholder metric construction and scenario‐based risk assessment to find situation‐dependent just balances between individual rights and societal outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15359\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15359","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

面对越来越多的证据表明社交媒体平台与有害的社会结果(如两极分化、对机构的信任受到侵蚀以及错误信息的传播)之间存在关系,这一观点主张设计替代内容推荐算法,以服务于社会利益和活跃的民主话语。我们建议通过培养健康的公民话语来处理内容推荐算法的设计,这有助于确定相关性的维度,以指导内容推荐算法的发展。这种方法根植于欧盟新颖的《数字服务法案》(Digital Services Act),并将内容推荐与民主价值观结合起来,从而为其他内容推荐算法提供了合法性。我们探讨了内容推荐和言论自由干预之间的权衡,并提出了一个研究议程,该议程使用多利益相关者度量构建和基于场景的风险评估方法,以找到个人权利和社会结果之间依赖于情境的公正平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing social media content recommendation algorithms for societal good
In the face of mounting evidence for a relationship between social media platforms and detrimental societal outcomes such as polarization, the erosion of trust in institutions, and the spread of misinformation, this perspective argues for the design of alternative content recommendation algorithms that serve the societal good and a lively democratic discourse. We propose to approach the design of content recommendation algorithms through the lens of fostering a healthy civic discourse, which serves to identify dimensions of relevance to guide the development of content recommendation algorithms. This approach lends alternative content recommendation algorithms legitimacy by being rooted in the EU's novel Digital Services Act and by aligning content recommendation with democratic values. We explore the trade‐off between interventions in content recommendation and freedom of expression and propose a research agenda that uses approaches from multistakeholder metric construction and scenario‐based risk assessment to find situation‐dependent just balances between individual rights and societal outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
1.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信