Yi-Chen Weng, Henry Nameirakpam, Edvin K. W. Andersson, Elin Cartwright, M. Venkata Kamalakar, Maria Hahlin, Andreas Lindblad
{"title":"固体聚合物电解质PTMC:LiBOB和PCL:LiBOB非弹性平均自由程的测定","authors":"Yi-Chen Weng, Henry Nameirakpam, Edvin K. W. Andersson, Elin Cartwright, M. Venkata Kamalakar, Maria Hahlin, Andreas Lindblad","doi":"10.1063/5.0254600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) has been widely applied in the field of battery studies. However, the lack of knowledge regarding the inelastic mean free path (IMFP) for studied systems limits the interpretation of spectroscopic results. In this work, the IMFP of poly(trimethylene carbonate) (PTMC), poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), and the solid polymer electrolytes consisting of lithium bis(oxalate)borate (LiBOB) together with PTMC or PCL has been determined using PES at a photoelectron kinetic energy of 8.7 keV. Additionally, the surface roughness of these films was investigated by atomic force microscopy and correlated with calculated IMFP values. Our studies reveal that the IMFP of solid polymer electrolytes is higher than that of pure polymers. The presented IMFPs provide references for future spectroscopic studies involving these materials.","PeriodicalId":8094,"journal":{"name":"Applied Physics Letters","volume":"135 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of inelastic mean free path for solid polymer electrolytes: PTMC:LiBOB and PCL:LiBOB\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Chen Weng, Henry Nameirakpam, Edvin K. W. Andersson, Elin Cartwright, M. Venkata Kamalakar, Maria Hahlin, Andreas Lindblad\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/5.0254600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) has been widely applied in the field of battery studies. However, the lack of knowledge regarding the inelastic mean free path (IMFP) for studied systems limits the interpretation of spectroscopic results. In this work, the IMFP of poly(trimethylene carbonate) (PTMC), poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), and the solid polymer electrolytes consisting of lithium bis(oxalate)borate (LiBOB) together with PTMC or PCL has been determined using PES at a photoelectron kinetic energy of 8.7 keV. Additionally, the surface roughness of these films was investigated by atomic force microscopy and correlated with calculated IMFP values. Our studies reveal that the IMFP of solid polymer electrolytes is higher than that of pure polymers. The presented IMFPs provide references for future spectroscopic studies involving these materials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Physics Letters\",\"volume\":\"135 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Physics Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0254600\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Physics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0254600","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determination of inelastic mean free path for solid polymer electrolytes: PTMC:LiBOB and PCL:LiBOB
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) has been widely applied in the field of battery studies. However, the lack of knowledge regarding the inelastic mean free path (IMFP) for studied systems limits the interpretation of spectroscopic results. In this work, the IMFP of poly(trimethylene carbonate) (PTMC), poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), and the solid polymer electrolytes consisting of lithium bis(oxalate)borate (LiBOB) together with PTMC or PCL has been determined using PES at a photoelectron kinetic energy of 8.7 keV. Additionally, the surface roughness of these films was investigated by atomic force microscopy and correlated with calculated IMFP values. Our studies reveal that the IMFP of solid polymer electrolytes is higher than that of pure polymers. The presented IMFPs provide references for future spectroscopic studies involving these materials.
期刊介绍:
Applied Physics Letters (APL) features concise, up-to-date reports on significant new findings in applied physics. Emphasizing rapid dissemination of key data and new physical insights, APL offers prompt publication of new experimental and theoretical papers reporting applications of physics phenomena to all branches of science, engineering, and modern technology.
In addition to regular articles, the journal also publishes invited Fast Track, Perspectives, and in-depth Editorials which report on cutting-edge areas in applied physics.
APL Perspectives are forward-looking invited letters which highlight recent developments or discoveries. Emphasis is placed on very recent developments, potentially disruptive technologies, open questions and possible solutions. They also include a mini-roadmap detailing where the community should direct efforts in order for the phenomena to be viable for application and the challenges associated with meeting that performance threshold. Perspectives are characterized by personal viewpoints and opinions of recognized experts in the field.
Fast Track articles are invited original research articles that report results that are particularly novel and important or provide a significant advancement in an emerging field. Because of the urgency and scientific importance of the work, the peer review process is accelerated. If, during the review process, it becomes apparent that the paper does not meet the Fast Track criterion, it is returned to a normal track.