澳大利亚维多利亚州结直肠癌患者急诊表现的地理和社会经济差异

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-04 DOI:10.1002/cam4.70909
Bedasa Taye Merga, Nikki McCaffrey, Suzanne Robinson, Craig Sinclair, Justin M. Yeung, Anita Lal
{"title":"澳大利亚维多利亚州结直肠癌患者急诊表现的地理和社会经济差异","authors":"Bedasa Taye Merga,&nbsp;Nikki McCaffrey,&nbsp;Suzanne Robinson,&nbsp;Craig Sinclair,&nbsp;Justin M. Yeung,&nbsp;Anita Lal","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Disparities in cancer care access and utilisation influence the stage of diagnosis and pathways of care. Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients presenting as emergencies often have advanced disease and poorer outcomes. This study aimed to assess geographic and socioeconomic disparities in emergency presentations (EPs) of CRC patients in Victoria, Australia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Linked datasets from a Victorian population-based cancer registry and emergency and hospital admissions were analysed for CRC patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2022. Concentration indices (CIs) assessed the distribution of EPs by socioeconomic position and remoteness. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with EPs, with results presented as adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. In all analyses, statistical significance was determined using a <i>p</i>-value threshold &lt; 0.05.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 24,236 CRC patients had emergency department (ED) visits for any reason. Twenty-one per cent (5086) of them reported CRC-related symptoms. Among these, 33.8% (1721) presented within 6 months before diagnosis. The concentration indices indicated that EPs were disproportionately higher among the most disadvantaged quintiles (CI = −0.060, <i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001) and regional and remote areas (CI = −0.065, <i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression showed higher odds of EPs among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups (Q1: AOR = 1.25; Q2: AOR = 1.31) compared to the least disadvantaged (Q5). Similarly, patients in regional and remote areas had higher odds of EP than those in major cities (inner regional: AOR = 1.26; outer regional/remote: AOR = 1.52). Advanced-stage diagnoses compared to early stages (stage 4: AOR = 1.67), whereas older age groups had lower odds compared to 45–49 age groups (65–69 years: AOR = 0.67, &gt; = 75 years, AOR = 0.60 to 0.70).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Enhancing access to primary care and strengthening cancer screening programs, particularly in socioeconomically disadvantaged and regional, and remote communities, could reduce disparities, promote earlier diagnosis, and improve outcomes. Prioritising targeted interventions in these populations is essential to addressing these inequities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70909","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geographic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Emergency Presentations Among Colorectal Cancer Patients in Victoria, Australia\",\"authors\":\"Bedasa Taye Merga,&nbsp;Nikki McCaffrey,&nbsp;Suzanne Robinson,&nbsp;Craig Sinclair,&nbsp;Justin M. Yeung,&nbsp;Anita Lal\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cam4.70909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Disparities in cancer care access and utilisation influence the stage of diagnosis and pathways of care. Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients presenting as emergencies often have advanced disease and poorer outcomes. This study aimed to assess geographic and socioeconomic disparities in emergency presentations (EPs) of CRC patients in Victoria, Australia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Linked datasets from a Victorian population-based cancer registry and emergency and hospital admissions were analysed for CRC patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2022. Concentration indices (CIs) assessed the distribution of EPs by socioeconomic position and remoteness. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with EPs, with results presented as adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. In all analyses, statistical significance was determined using a <i>p</i>-value threshold &lt; 0.05.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 24,236 CRC patients had emergency department (ED) visits for any reason. Twenty-one per cent (5086) of them reported CRC-related symptoms. Among these, 33.8% (1721) presented within 6 months before diagnosis. The concentration indices indicated that EPs were disproportionately higher among the most disadvantaged quintiles (CI = −0.060, <i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001) and regional and remote areas (CI = −0.065, <i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression showed higher odds of EPs among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups (Q1: AOR = 1.25; Q2: AOR = 1.31) compared to the least disadvantaged (Q5). Similarly, patients in regional and remote areas had higher odds of EP than those in major cities (inner regional: AOR = 1.26; outer regional/remote: AOR = 1.52). Advanced-stage diagnoses compared to early stages (stage 4: AOR = 1.67), whereas older age groups had lower odds compared to 45–49 age groups (65–69 years: AOR = 0.67, &gt; = 75 years, AOR = 0.60 to 0.70).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Enhancing access to primary care and strengthening cancer screening programs, particularly in socioeconomically disadvantaged and regional, and remote communities, could reduce disparities, promote earlier diagnosis, and improve outcomes. Prioritising targeted interventions in these populations is essential to addressing these inequities.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70909\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70909\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70909","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:癌症治疗获取和利用的差异影响诊断阶段和治疗途径。作为急症出现的结直肠癌(CRC)患者往往有晚期疾病和较差的预后。本研究旨在评估澳大利亚维多利亚州CRC患者急诊表现(EPs)的地理和社会经济差异。方法对2009年至2022年间诊断为结直肠癌的维多利亚州人群癌症登记处、急诊和住院患者的相关数据集进行分析。浓度指数(CIs)通过社会经济地位和偏远程度来评估EPs的分布。多变量逻辑回归确定了与EPs相关的因素,结果显示为调整后的优势比和95%置信区间。在所有分析中,使用p值阈值<; 0.05来确定统计显著性。结果共有24236例结直肠癌患者因各种原因急诊就诊。其中21%(5086人)报告了crc相关症状。其中33.8%(1721例)在诊断前6个月内出现。浓度指数表明,最弱势的五分之一(CI = - 0.060, p值<; 0.001)和区域和偏远地区(CI = - 0.065, p值<; 0.001)的EPs不成比例地高。多变量logistic回归显示,社会经济弱势群体发生EPs的几率较高(Q1: AOR = 1.25;Q2: AOR = 1.31)与最弱势群体(Q5)相比。同样,地区和偏远地区的患者发生EP的几率高于大城市(区域内:AOR = 1.26;外区域/偏远:AOR = 1.52)。晚期诊断与早期诊断相比(4期:AOR = 1.67),而老年组与45-49岁年龄组相比(65-69岁:AOR = 0.67, > = 75岁,AOR = 0.60至0.70)。结论:加强初级保健的可及性和加强癌症筛查项目,特别是在社会经济条件较差的地区和偏远社区,可以缩小差距,促进早期诊断,改善结果。在这些人群中优先采取有针对性的干预措施,对于解决这些不平等现象至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Geographic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Emergency Presentations Among Colorectal Cancer Patients in Victoria, Australia

Geographic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Emergency Presentations Among Colorectal Cancer Patients in Victoria, Australia

Background

Disparities in cancer care access and utilisation influence the stage of diagnosis and pathways of care. Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients presenting as emergencies often have advanced disease and poorer outcomes. This study aimed to assess geographic and socioeconomic disparities in emergency presentations (EPs) of CRC patients in Victoria, Australia.

Methods

Linked datasets from a Victorian population-based cancer registry and emergency and hospital admissions were analysed for CRC patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2022. Concentration indices (CIs) assessed the distribution of EPs by socioeconomic position and remoteness. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with EPs, with results presented as adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. In all analyses, statistical significance was determined using a p-value threshold < 0.05.

Results

A total of 24,236 CRC patients had emergency department (ED) visits for any reason. Twenty-one per cent (5086) of them reported CRC-related symptoms. Among these, 33.8% (1721) presented within 6 months before diagnosis. The concentration indices indicated that EPs were disproportionately higher among the most disadvantaged quintiles (CI = −0.060, p-value < 0.001) and regional and remote areas (CI = −0.065, p-value < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression showed higher odds of EPs among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups (Q1: AOR = 1.25; Q2: AOR = 1.31) compared to the least disadvantaged (Q5). Similarly, patients in regional and remote areas had higher odds of EP than those in major cities (inner regional: AOR = 1.26; outer regional/remote: AOR = 1.52). Advanced-stage diagnoses compared to early stages (stage 4: AOR = 1.67), whereas older age groups had lower odds compared to 45–49 age groups (65–69 years: AOR = 0.67, > = 75 years, AOR = 0.60 to 0.70).

Conclusions

Enhancing access to primary care and strengthening cancer screening programs, particularly in socioeconomically disadvantaged and regional, and remote communities, could reduce disparities, promote earlier diagnosis, and improve outcomes. Prioritising targeted interventions in these populations is essential to addressing these inequities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信