一项多中心,随机,对照,临床试验评估冻干保留羊膜治疗静脉性腿部溃疡

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yadwinder Dhillon, Lena Levine, Gregory Tovmassian, Alexander Reyzelman, Francisco Perez-Clavijo, Francis Wodie, Shawn Cazzell, Allan Grossman, Lesly Robinson, Felix Sigal, Robert S Kirsner, Mher Vartivarian, Molly Saunders, Jaideep Banerjee
{"title":"一项多中心,随机,对照,临床试验评估冻干保留羊膜治疗静脉性腿部溃疡","authors":"Yadwinder Dhillon,&nbsp;Lena Levine,&nbsp;Gregory Tovmassian,&nbsp;Alexander Reyzelman,&nbsp;Francisco Perez-Clavijo,&nbsp;Francis Wodie,&nbsp;Shawn Cazzell,&nbsp;Allan Grossman,&nbsp;Lesly Robinson,&nbsp;Felix Sigal,&nbsp;Robert S Kirsner,&nbsp;Mher Vartivarian,&nbsp;Molly Saunders,&nbsp;Jaideep Banerjee","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Standard of Care (SoC) with multilayer compression therapy along with proper wound management, may not be sufficient to close all venous ulcers and needs advanced therapies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial, 351 patients were screened, 200 were eligible and enrolled and were randomized 1:1 to LPM (lyopreserved cellular placental membrane) plus SoC or SoC alone for up to 12 weeks. Patients were enrolled between June 2018 and November 2020 at 30 sites across the United States. Outcome measures included complete closure of the index ulcer (primary), reduction in wound size, rate of closure, quality of life, and adverse events.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>ITT analysis revealed that wounds treated with weekly applications of LPM as an adjunct to standard of care, reduced in size significantly more than SoC alone, at the end of 4, 8, and 12 graft applications, indicating a faster progression to closure. There was a statistically 1.72 higher relative risk or 72% higher probability of wound closure with LPM compared to the SoC group during the study period for wounds with an initial size of 3–25 cm<sup>2</sup>. Use of LPM as an adjunct was able to close statistically larger-sized wounds on average. There was also a statistically significant fivefold improvement in quality of life (overall physical symptoms and daily life) over baseline, in the LPM treated patients as compared to the control group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>LPM and standard of care, significantly closed more venous leg ulcers and faster than standard of care alone and improved the quality of life for patients, suggesting that the use of aseptically processed LPM is a safe and effective treatment option in the healing of chronic venous leg ulcers.</p>\n \n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03629236, Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of GrafixPL for the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers. (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03629236).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70819","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating a Lyopreserved Amniotic Membrane in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers\",\"authors\":\"Yadwinder Dhillon,&nbsp;Lena Levine,&nbsp;Gregory Tovmassian,&nbsp;Alexander Reyzelman,&nbsp;Francisco Perez-Clavijo,&nbsp;Francis Wodie,&nbsp;Shawn Cazzell,&nbsp;Allan Grossman,&nbsp;Lesly Robinson,&nbsp;Felix Sigal,&nbsp;Robert S Kirsner,&nbsp;Mher Vartivarian,&nbsp;Molly Saunders,&nbsp;Jaideep Banerjee\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hsr2.70819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Standard of Care (SoC) with multilayer compression therapy along with proper wound management, may not be sufficient to close all venous ulcers and needs advanced therapies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial, 351 patients were screened, 200 were eligible and enrolled and were randomized 1:1 to LPM (lyopreserved cellular placental membrane) plus SoC or SoC alone for up to 12 weeks. Patients were enrolled between June 2018 and November 2020 at 30 sites across the United States. Outcome measures included complete closure of the index ulcer (primary), reduction in wound size, rate of closure, quality of life, and adverse events.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>ITT analysis revealed that wounds treated with weekly applications of LPM as an adjunct to standard of care, reduced in size significantly more than SoC alone, at the end of 4, 8, and 12 graft applications, indicating a faster progression to closure. There was a statistically 1.72 higher relative risk or 72% higher probability of wound closure with LPM compared to the SoC group during the study period for wounds with an initial size of 3–25 cm<sup>2</sup>. Use of LPM as an adjunct was able to close statistically larger-sized wounds on average. There was also a statistically significant fivefold improvement in quality of life (overall physical symptoms and daily life) over baseline, in the LPM treated patients as compared to the control group.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>LPM and standard of care, significantly closed more venous leg ulcers and faster than standard of care alone and improved the quality of life for patients, suggesting that the use of aseptically processed LPM is a safe and effective treatment option in the healing of chronic venous leg ulcers.</p>\\n \\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03629236, Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of GrafixPL for the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers. (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03629236).</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"volume\":\"8 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70819\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70819\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:标准护理(SoC)采用多层压迫治疗和适当的伤口管理,可能不足以关闭所有静脉溃疡,需要先进的治疗方法。方法在这项多中心、前瞻性、随机、对照、开放标签的试验中,筛选了351例患者,其中200例符合条件并入组,按1:1的比例随机分为LPM (lyopreserved cellular placental membrane)加SoC或单独SoC两组,为期12周。患者于2018年6月至2020年11月在美国30个地点登记。结果测量包括指数溃疡(原发性)完全闭合,伤口大小减小,闭合率,生活质量和不良事件。结果ITT分析显示,每周应用LPM作为标准护理的辅助,在4、8和12次移植物应用结束时,伤口的尺寸明显比单独使用SoC更小,表明愈合进展更快。在研究期间,初始伤口大小为3-25 cm2的LPM组伤口闭合的相对风险比SoC组高1.72或72%。使用LPM作为辅助手段能够平均关闭统计上较大的伤口。与对照组相比,LPM治疗患者的生活质量(总体身体症状和日常生活)也有统计学上显著的五倍改善。结论LPM联合标准护理比单独标准护理更能有效地关闭静脉性腿部溃疡,改善患者的生活质量,提示使用无菌处理的LPM治疗慢性静脉性腿部溃疡是一种安全有效的治疗选择。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03629236,研究评估GrafixPL治疗静脉性腿部溃疡的安全性和有效性。(https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03629236)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating a Lyopreserved Amniotic Membrane in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers

A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating a Lyopreserved Amniotic Membrane in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers

Background

Standard of Care (SoC) with multilayer compression therapy along with proper wound management, may not be sufficient to close all venous ulcers and needs advanced therapies.

Methods

In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial, 351 patients were screened, 200 were eligible and enrolled and were randomized 1:1 to LPM (lyopreserved cellular placental membrane) plus SoC or SoC alone for up to 12 weeks. Patients were enrolled between June 2018 and November 2020 at 30 sites across the United States. Outcome measures included complete closure of the index ulcer (primary), reduction in wound size, rate of closure, quality of life, and adverse events.

Results

ITT analysis revealed that wounds treated with weekly applications of LPM as an adjunct to standard of care, reduced in size significantly more than SoC alone, at the end of 4, 8, and 12 graft applications, indicating a faster progression to closure. There was a statistically 1.72 higher relative risk or 72% higher probability of wound closure with LPM compared to the SoC group during the study period for wounds with an initial size of 3–25 cm2. Use of LPM as an adjunct was able to close statistically larger-sized wounds on average. There was also a statistically significant fivefold improvement in quality of life (overall physical symptoms and daily life) over baseline, in the LPM treated patients as compared to the control group.

Conclusion

LPM and standard of care, significantly closed more venous leg ulcers and faster than standard of care alone and improved the quality of life for patients, suggesting that the use of aseptically processed LPM is a safe and effective treatment option in the healing of chronic venous leg ulcers.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03629236, Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of GrafixPL for the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers. (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03629236).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信