考虑洪水及其潜在驱动因素共现性的洪水再发期修正

IF 3.5 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Kanneganti Bhargav Kumar, Rajarshi Das Bhowmik, Pradeep P. Mujumdar
{"title":"考虑洪水及其潜在驱动因素共现性的洪水再发期修正","authors":"Kanneganti Bhargav Kumar,&nbsp;Rajarshi Das Bhowmik,&nbsp;Pradeep P. Mujumdar","doi":"10.1002/joc.8783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The return period of floods can be influenced by the extreme values of their potential drivers, which may vary among catchments. Understanding the risk and the associated changes in return periods due to these extreme values of drivers is therefore of interest in flood hydrology. In this study, floods are considered as compound events resulting from a combination of non-independent factors. The return periods of these events are estimated using joint distribution functions, accounting for the dependence of flood peaks and their potential drivers in two distinct catchments: (i) an inland catchment-Warunji Catchment, Krishna basin, India, and (ii) a coastal catchment-Usk catchment, United Kingdom (UK). The annual maximum (AM) rainfall, soil moisture and storm surge are considered as potential drivers of floods and their variations in time of occurrence are calculated to understand co-occurrence patterns. The pairwise co-occurrence frequency and dependence are estimated, and joint distribution is calculated with the survival copula distribution function. The results indicate that AM values of the variables tend to co-occur within a short time window, signifying that the flood risk changes with the extreme values of drivers. The maximum values of the AM series of drivers are observed in the same year as the largest flood in the series. The joint return periods of flood events show significant variations from their univariate estimates in both catchments, which have different flood-generating mechanisms. This work re-emphasises the findings in recent literature that the traditional univariate risk assessment methods based only on flood peak information may substantially underestimate/overestimate the risk of floods by neglecting the effects of their potential drivers and that a multivariate viewpoint is imperative for assessing the risk of floods.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13779,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Climatology","volume":"45 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revising Flood Return Periods by Accounting for the Co-Occurrence Between Floods and Their Potential Drivers\",\"authors\":\"Kanneganti Bhargav Kumar,&nbsp;Rajarshi Das Bhowmik,&nbsp;Pradeep P. Mujumdar\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joc.8783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The return period of floods can be influenced by the extreme values of their potential drivers, which may vary among catchments. Understanding the risk and the associated changes in return periods due to these extreme values of drivers is therefore of interest in flood hydrology. In this study, floods are considered as compound events resulting from a combination of non-independent factors. The return periods of these events are estimated using joint distribution functions, accounting for the dependence of flood peaks and their potential drivers in two distinct catchments: (i) an inland catchment-Warunji Catchment, Krishna basin, India, and (ii) a coastal catchment-Usk catchment, United Kingdom (UK). The annual maximum (AM) rainfall, soil moisture and storm surge are considered as potential drivers of floods and their variations in time of occurrence are calculated to understand co-occurrence patterns. The pairwise co-occurrence frequency and dependence are estimated, and joint distribution is calculated with the survival copula distribution function. The results indicate that AM values of the variables tend to co-occur within a short time window, signifying that the flood risk changes with the extreme values of drivers. The maximum values of the AM series of drivers are observed in the same year as the largest flood in the series. The joint return periods of flood events show significant variations from their univariate estimates in both catchments, which have different flood-generating mechanisms. This work re-emphasises the findings in recent literature that the traditional univariate risk assessment methods based only on flood peak information may substantially underestimate/overestimate the risk of floods by neglecting the effects of their potential drivers and that a multivariate viewpoint is imperative for assessing the risk of floods.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Climatology\",\"volume\":\"45 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Climatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.8783\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.8783","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

洪水的重现期可能受到其潜在驱动因素的极值的影响,这些极值可能因集水区而异。因此,了解由于这些驱动因素的极端值而导致的风险和相关的回归期变化是洪水水文学的兴趣所在。在本研究中,洪水被认为是由非独立因素组合而成的复合事件。使用联合分布函数估计这些事件的重现期,考虑到两个不同流域的洪峰及其潜在驱动因素的依赖性:(i)内陆流域-印度克里希纳盆地的warunji流域,以及(ii)沿海流域-英国的usk流域。年最大降雨量、土壤湿度和风暴潮被认为是洪水的潜在驱动因素,并计算了它们在发生时间上的变化,以了解共现模式。估计了两两共现频率和相关性,利用生存联结分布函数计算了联合分布。结果表明,各变量的AM值在较短的时间窗内趋于同时出现,表明洪水风险随驱动因素的极值而变化。AM系列驱动因子的最大值出现在该系列中最大洪水发生的同一年。洪水事件的联合重现期在两个集水区的单变量估计中表现出显著差异,这两个集水区具有不同的洪水发生机制。这项工作再次强调了最近文献中的发现,即传统的单变量风险评估方法仅基于洪峰信息,可能会大大低估/高估洪水的风险,而忽略了其潜在驱动因素的影响,并且多变量观点对于评估洪水风险至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revising Flood Return Periods by Accounting for the Co-Occurrence Between Floods and Their Potential Drivers

The return period of floods can be influenced by the extreme values of their potential drivers, which may vary among catchments. Understanding the risk and the associated changes in return periods due to these extreme values of drivers is therefore of interest in flood hydrology. In this study, floods are considered as compound events resulting from a combination of non-independent factors. The return periods of these events are estimated using joint distribution functions, accounting for the dependence of flood peaks and their potential drivers in two distinct catchments: (i) an inland catchment-Warunji Catchment, Krishna basin, India, and (ii) a coastal catchment-Usk catchment, United Kingdom (UK). The annual maximum (AM) rainfall, soil moisture and storm surge are considered as potential drivers of floods and their variations in time of occurrence are calculated to understand co-occurrence patterns. The pairwise co-occurrence frequency and dependence are estimated, and joint distribution is calculated with the survival copula distribution function. The results indicate that AM values of the variables tend to co-occur within a short time window, signifying that the flood risk changes with the extreme values of drivers. The maximum values of the AM series of drivers are observed in the same year as the largest flood in the series. The joint return periods of flood events show significant variations from their univariate estimates in both catchments, which have different flood-generating mechanisms. This work re-emphasises the findings in recent literature that the traditional univariate risk assessment methods based only on flood peak information may substantially underestimate/overestimate the risk of floods by neglecting the effects of their potential drivers and that a multivariate viewpoint is imperative for assessing the risk of floods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Climatology
International Journal of Climatology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
417
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Climatology aims to span the well established but rapidly growing field of climatology, through the publication of research papers, short communications, major reviews of progress and reviews of new books and reports in the area of climate science. The Journal’s main role is to stimulate and report research in climatology, from the expansive fields of the atmospheric, biophysical, engineering and social sciences. Coverage includes: Climate system science; Local to global scale climate observations and modelling; Seasonal to interannual climate prediction; Climatic variability and climate change; Synoptic, dynamic and urban climatology, hydroclimatology, human bioclimatology, ecoclimatology, dendroclimatology, palaeoclimatology, marine climatology and atmosphere-ocean interactions; Application of climatological knowledge to environmental assessment and management and economic production; Climate and society interactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信