沿着趋同-发散连续体:任务结构在PISA创造性思维评估中的作用

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Selcuk Acar, Yuyang Shen
{"title":"沿着趋同-发散连续体:任务结构在PISA创造性思维评估中的作用","authors":"Selcuk Acar,&nbsp;Yuyang Shen","doi":"10.1002/jocb.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Creativity tests, like creativity itself, vary widely in their structure and use. These differences include instructions, test duration, environments, prompt and response modalities, and the structure of test items. A key factor is task structure, referring to the specificity of the number of responses requested for a given prompt. Classic creativity assessments often use divergent thinking tasks, which allow for multiple responses. In contrast, other measures, such as insight tasks or the Remote Associates Test, require a single correct answer. This distinction suggests that a creativity test's correlates could depend on its placement along the convergent–divergent continuum. The PISA Creative Thinking assessment leans toward the divergent end, as none of its items require a single correct answer. However, it differs from traditional divergent thinking tests by not explicitly instructing participants to generate as many responses as possible. Instead, PISA items allow varying numbers of responses—some requiring one, others two or three. This variation reflects different levels of divergence, with one-response items being more convergent than three-response items. We argue that this difference in task structure should be considered when examining the relationship between PISA creativity scores and factors like academic achievement and socioeconomic status.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":39915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creative Behavior","volume":"59 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Along the Convergent–Divergent Continuum: The Role of Task Structure in the PISA Creative Thinking Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Selcuk Acar,&nbsp;Yuyang Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jocb.70029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Creativity tests, like creativity itself, vary widely in their structure and use. These differences include instructions, test duration, environments, prompt and response modalities, and the structure of test items. A key factor is task structure, referring to the specificity of the number of responses requested for a given prompt. Classic creativity assessments often use divergent thinking tasks, which allow for multiple responses. In contrast, other measures, such as insight tasks or the Remote Associates Test, require a single correct answer. This distinction suggests that a creativity test's correlates could depend on its placement along the convergent–divergent continuum. The PISA Creative Thinking assessment leans toward the divergent end, as none of its items require a single correct answer. However, it differs from traditional divergent thinking tests by not explicitly instructing participants to generate as many responses as possible. Instead, PISA items allow varying numbers of responses—some requiring one, others two or three. This variation reflects different levels of divergence, with one-response items being more convergent than three-response items. We argue that this difference in task structure should be considered when examining the relationship between PISA creativity scores and factors like academic achievement and socioeconomic status.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Creative Behavior\",\"volume\":\"59 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Creative Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocb.70029\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creative Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocb.70029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创造力测试,就像创造力本身一样,在结构和用途上有很大的不同。这些差异包括说明、测试时间、环境、提示和反应方式以及测试项目的结构。一个关键因素是任务结构,它指的是给定提示请求的响应数量的特殊性。经典的创造力评估通常使用发散思维任务,允许多种反应。相比之下,其他测试,如洞察力任务或远程联想测试,需要一个正确答案。这一区别表明,创造力测试的相关因素可能取决于它在趋同-发散连续体上的位置。PISA创造性思维评估倾向于发散性的一端,因为它的所有项目都不需要一个正确答案。然而,它与传统的发散性思维测试的不同之处在于,它没有明确指示参与者产生尽可能多的答案。相反,PISA项目允许不同数量的回答——有些需要一个,有些需要两个或三个。这种差异反映了不同程度的差异,单反应项目比三反应项目更具收敛性。我们认为,在检查PISA创造力得分与学业成就和社会经济地位等因素之间的关系时,应该考虑到这种任务结构的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Along the Convergent–Divergent Continuum: The Role of Task Structure in the PISA Creative Thinking Assessment

Creativity tests, like creativity itself, vary widely in their structure and use. These differences include instructions, test duration, environments, prompt and response modalities, and the structure of test items. A key factor is task structure, referring to the specificity of the number of responses requested for a given prompt. Classic creativity assessments often use divergent thinking tasks, which allow for multiple responses. In contrast, other measures, such as insight tasks or the Remote Associates Test, require a single correct answer. This distinction suggests that a creativity test's correlates could depend on its placement along the convergent–divergent continuum. The PISA Creative Thinking assessment leans toward the divergent end, as none of its items require a single correct answer. However, it differs from traditional divergent thinking tests by not explicitly instructing participants to generate as many responses as possible. Instead, PISA items allow varying numbers of responses—some requiring one, others two or three. This variation reflects different levels of divergence, with one-response items being more convergent than three-response items. We argue that this difference in task structure should be considered when examining the relationship between PISA creativity scores and factors like academic achievement and socioeconomic status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Creative Behavior
Journal of Creative Behavior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Creative Behavior is our quarterly academic journal citing the most current research in creative thinking. For nearly four decades JCB has been the benchmark scientific periodical in the field. It provides up to date cutting-edge ideas about creativity in education, psychology, business, arts and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信