比较过程挖掘识别脓毒症轨迹中的关键活动

IF 2.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Mohsen Mohammadi
{"title":"比较过程挖掘识别脓毒症轨迹中的关键活动","authors":"Mohsen Mohammadi","doi":"10.1049/htl2.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sepsis, a life-threatening condition with high mortality and readmission rates, demands precise and timely management to improve patient outcomes. Despite advancements, identifying the critical activities within sepsis treatment pathways remains a challenge, limiting the effectiveness of interventions. This study addresses this issue by utilising comparative process mining techniques to analyse sepsis trajectories, focusing on key performance metrics—sojourn time, arrival rate and finish rate—across distinct patient clusters. The analysis is based on real-life event logs from a hospital's sepsis cases, using K-means clustering to segment patients by age, severity and key clinical indicators. The study reveals critical activities such as ‘Return ER’, ‘Admission IC’, and ‘Release C’, which consistently exhibit high sojourn times and influence patient outcomes significantly. These activities emerge as bottlenecks in the patient care process, particularly in cases of severe sepsis, where delays can lead to increased complications and mortality. By identifying these critical points, the study provides actionable insights for healthcare providers to optimize resource allocation, reduce delays and enhance the overall efficiency of sepsis management. The findings underscore the importance of targeted interventions in these key areas, offering a path toward improved clinical outcomes and reduced sepsis-related mortality and readmission rates. This research contributes to the growing field of process mining in healthcare, highlighting its potential to transform complex clinical pathways into more efficient and effective treatment processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":37474,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Technology Letters","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/htl2.70010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Process Mining for Identifying the Critical Activities in Sepsis Trajectories\",\"authors\":\"Mohsen Mohammadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/htl2.70010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Sepsis, a life-threatening condition with high mortality and readmission rates, demands precise and timely management to improve patient outcomes. Despite advancements, identifying the critical activities within sepsis treatment pathways remains a challenge, limiting the effectiveness of interventions. This study addresses this issue by utilising comparative process mining techniques to analyse sepsis trajectories, focusing on key performance metrics—sojourn time, arrival rate and finish rate—across distinct patient clusters. The analysis is based on real-life event logs from a hospital's sepsis cases, using K-means clustering to segment patients by age, severity and key clinical indicators. The study reveals critical activities such as ‘Return ER’, ‘Admission IC’, and ‘Release C’, which consistently exhibit high sojourn times and influence patient outcomes significantly. These activities emerge as bottlenecks in the patient care process, particularly in cases of severe sepsis, where delays can lead to increased complications and mortality. By identifying these critical points, the study provides actionable insights for healthcare providers to optimize resource allocation, reduce delays and enhance the overall efficiency of sepsis management. The findings underscore the importance of targeted interventions in these key areas, offering a path toward improved clinical outcomes and reduced sepsis-related mortality and readmission rates. This research contributes to the growing field of process mining in healthcare, highlighting its potential to transform complex clinical pathways into more efficient and effective treatment processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Technology Letters\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/htl2.70010\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Technology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/htl2.70010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Technology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/htl2.70010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脓毒症是一种具有高死亡率和再入院率的危及生命的疾病,需要精确和及时的管理来改善患者的预后。尽管取得了进展,但确定脓毒症治疗途径中的关键活动仍然是一个挑战,限制了干预措施的有效性。本研究通过利用比较过程挖掘技术来分析脓毒症的发展轨迹,重点关注不同患者群的关键绩效指标——逗留时间、到达率和完成率,从而解决了这个问题。该分析基于医院脓毒症病例的真实事件日志,使用K-means聚类方法根据年龄、严重程度和关键临床指标对患者进行分类。该研究揭示了诸如“返回ER”、“入院IC”和“释放C”等关键活动,这些活动始终表现出较高的逗留时间,并显著影响患者的预后。这些活动成为患者护理过程中的瓶颈,特别是在严重败血症的情况下,延误可能导致并发症和死亡率增加。通过确定这些关键点,该研究为医疗保健提供者提供了可操作的见解,以优化资源分配,减少延误并提高败血症管理的整体效率。研究结果强调了在这些关键领域进行针对性干预的重要性,为改善临床结果和降低败血症相关死亡率和再入院率提供了一条途径。这项研究促进了医疗保健过程挖掘领域的发展,突出了其将复杂的临床途径转化为更高效和有效的治疗过程的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative Process Mining for Identifying the Critical Activities in Sepsis Trajectories

Comparative Process Mining for Identifying the Critical Activities in Sepsis Trajectories

Sepsis, a life-threatening condition with high mortality and readmission rates, demands precise and timely management to improve patient outcomes. Despite advancements, identifying the critical activities within sepsis treatment pathways remains a challenge, limiting the effectiveness of interventions. This study addresses this issue by utilising comparative process mining techniques to analyse sepsis trajectories, focusing on key performance metrics—sojourn time, arrival rate and finish rate—across distinct patient clusters. The analysis is based on real-life event logs from a hospital's sepsis cases, using K-means clustering to segment patients by age, severity and key clinical indicators. The study reveals critical activities such as ‘Return ER’, ‘Admission IC’, and ‘Release C’, which consistently exhibit high sojourn times and influence patient outcomes significantly. These activities emerge as bottlenecks in the patient care process, particularly in cases of severe sepsis, where delays can lead to increased complications and mortality. By identifying these critical points, the study provides actionable insights for healthcare providers to optimize resource allocation, reduce delays and enhance the overall efficiency of sepsis management. The findings underscore the importance of targeted interventions in these key areas, offering a path toward improved clinical outcomes and reduced sepsis-related mortality and readmission rates. This research contributes to the growing field of process mining in healthcare, highlighting its potential to transform complex clinical pathways into more efficient and effective treatment processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Technology Letters
Healthcare Technology Letters Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
12
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Healthcare Technology Letters aims to bring together an audience of biomedical and electrical engineers, physical and computer scientists, and mathematicians to enable the exchange of the latest ideas and advances through rapid online publication of original healthcare technology research. Major themes of the journal include (but are not limited to): Major technological/methodological areas: Biomedical signal processing Biomedical imaging and image processing Bioinstrumentation (sensors, wearable technologies, etc) Biomedical informatics Major application areas: Cardiovascular and respiratory systems engineering Neural engineering, neuromuscular systems Rehabilitation engineering Bio-robotics, surgical planning and biomechanics Therapeutic and diagnostic systems, devices and technologies Clinical engineering Healthcare information systems, telemedicine, mHealth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信