Wassim Hassan, Jabra Mustafa, Ahmad Hassan, Lauren Yaeger, Ibrahim S Al-Busaidi
{"title":"低温常压血浆治疗糖尿病足溃疡:系统综述","authors":"Wassim Hassan, Jabra Mustafa, Ahmad Hassan, Lauren Yaeger, Ibrahim S Al-Busaidi","doi":"10.1111/iwj.70517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAPP) is an innovative energy-based therapy which has gained momentum in recent years for its wide array of therapeutic applications. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CAPPs in treating diabetic foot ulcers. We conducted systematic literature searches on Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Clinicaltrials.gov using PRISMA guidelines. We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies conducted on patients with diabetic foot ulcers in which CAPP therapy was compared with a control treatment. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Four RCTs from two countries analysing a total of 153 patients were included in the review. Three studies reported a significant reduction in ulcer area in the CAPP group, one study reported a significant decrease in inflammatory markers, and mixed results were reported regarding the reduction of bacterial load. All studies reported no adverse side effects or concerns with the safety profile of CAPP. Current evidence supports CAPP's potential as safe and effective adjunctive therapy that may accelerate wound healing, reduce wound size, promote tissue regeneration and lower infection risks. However, the limited number and size of trials, variability in treatment protocols and short follow-up periods highlight the preliminary nature of these findings. Further large-scale, well-designed studies with standardised protocols and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm CAPP's efficacy and safety, as well as to determine its cost-effectiveness in diverse healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14451,"journal":{"name":"International Wound Journal","volume":"22 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iwj.70517","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Wassim Hassan, Jabra Mustafa, Ahmad Hassan, Lauren Yaeger, Ibrahim S Al-Busaidi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/iwj.70517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAPP) is an innovative energy-based therapy which has gained momentum in recent years for its wide array of therapeutic applications. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CAPPs in treating diabetic foot ulcers. We conducted systematic literature searches on Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Clinicaltrials.gov using PRISMA guidelines. We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies conducted on patients with diabetic foot ulcers in which CAPP therapy was compared with a control treatment. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Four RCTs from two countries analysing a total of 153 patients were included in the review. Three studies reported a significant reduction in ulcer area in the CAPP group, one study reported a significant decrease in inflammatory markers, and mixed results were reported regarding the reduction of bacterial load. All studies reported no adverse side effects or concerns with the safety profile of CAPP. Current evidence supports CAPP's potential as safe and effective adjunctive therapy that may accelerate wound healing, reduce wound size, promote tissue regeneration and lower infection risks. However, the limited number and size of trials, variability in treatment protocols and short follow-up periods highlight the preliminary nature of these findings. Further large-scale, well-designed studies with standardised protocols and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm CAPP's efficacy and safety, as well as to determine its cost-effectiveness in diverse healthcare settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Wound Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iwj.70517\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Wound Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.70517\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.70517","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
冷大气压等离子体(CAPP)是一种基于能量的创新疗法,近年来因其广泛的治疗应用而获得了发展势头。本系统综述旨在评价CAPPs治疗糖尿病足溃疡的有效性和安全性。我们使用PRISMA指南在Embase、Ovid Medline、Scopus、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Cochrane Database of systematic Reviews和Clinicaltrials.gov上进行了系统的文献检索。我们检索了对糖尿病足溃疡患者进行的随机对照试验(RCTs)和观察性研究,其中CAPP治疗与对照治疗进行了比较。使用Cochrane协作工具评估偏倚风险。本综述纳入了来自两个国家的4项随机对照试验,共分析了153例患者。三项研究报告了CAPP组溃疡面积的显著减少,一项研究报告了炎症标志物的显著减少,关于细菌负荷的减少报告了不同的结果。所有的研究报告没有不良副作用或对CAPP安全性的担忧。目前的证据支持CAPP作为安全有效的辅助治疗的潜力,可以加速伤口愈合,缩小伤口大小,促进组织再生和降低感染风险。然而,有限的试验数量和规模、治疗方案的可变性和较短的随访期突出了这些发现的初步性质。需要进一步的大规模、精心设计的标准化方案和长期随访研究来确认CAPP的有效性和安全性,并确定其在不同医疗保健环境中的成本效益。
Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review
Cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAPP) is an innovative energy-based therapy which has gained momentum in recent years for its wide array of therapeutic applications. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CAPPs in treating diabetic foot ulcers. We conducted systematic literature searches on Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Clinicaltrials.gov using PRISMA guidelines. We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies conducted on patients with diabetic foot ulcers in which CAPP therapy was compared with a control treatment. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Four RCTs from two countries analysing a total of 153 patients were included in the review. Three studies reported a significant reduction in ulcer area in the CAPP group, one study reported a significant decrease in inflammatory markers, and mixed results were reported regarding the reduction of bacterial load. All studies reported no adverse side effects or concerns with the safety profile of CAPP. Current evidence supports CAPP's potential as safe and effective adjunctive therapy that may accelerate wound healing, reduce wound size, promote tissue regeneration and lower infection risks. However, the limited number and size of trials, variability in treatment protocols and short follow-up periods highlight the preliminary nature of these findings. Further large-scale, well-designed studies with standardised protocols and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm CAPP's efficacy and safety, as well as to determine its cost-effectiveness in diverse healthcare settings.
期刊介绍:
The Editors welcome papers on all aspects of prevention and treatment of wounds and associated conditions in the fields of surgery, dermatology, oncology, nursing, radiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and podiatry. The Journal accepts papers in the following categories:
- Research papers
- Review articles
- Clinical studies
- Letters
- News and Views: international perspectives, education initiatives, guidelines and different activities of groups and societies.
Calendar of events
The Editors are supported by a board of international experts and a panel of reviewers across a range of disciplines and specialties which ensures only the most current and relevant research is published.